The Impact of Immigrant Concentration in Schools on Grade Retention in Spain: a Difference-in-Differences Approach

Pedraja Chaparro, Francisco and Santín González, Daniel and Simancas Rodríguez, Rosa (2013): The Impact of Immigrant Concentration in Schools on Grade Retention in Spain: a Difference-in-Differences Approach.

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, Spain has played host to a sizeable flow of immigrants who have been absorbed into the compulsory stage of the education system. In this paper, our aim is to assess the impact of that exogenous increase in the number of immigrant students from 2003 to 2009 on grade retention using Spanish data from PISA 2003 and 2009. For this purpose, we use the difference-in-differences method (DiD), capable of detecting whether the immigrant concentration has had a significant effect on student performance. Within this framework, the control group will be the schools without sampled immigrants from 2003 to 2009 and the treatment group will be schools with immigrant students that experienced a significant increase of immigrants throughout this period. As the percentage of immigrants is different across schools, the DiD methodology is adapted to deal with a dose treatment. What we are looking for then is not simply the average effect of there being or not being foreign students at the school, but the effect of their concentration. In this way, the effect of immigrants joining schools can be isolated and estimated through a DiD dose estimator controlling by other educational variables that also influence school performance. Our results evidenced that their arrival does not on average decrease school promotion rates with respect to 2003 and is even beneficial to native students. Although the concentration of immigrant students at the same school does have a negative impact on immigrant students generating more grade retention, native students are unaffected until concentrations of immigrant students are higher.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: difference in differences, immigration, education, PISA
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education

References

Abadie, A. (2005): “Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences estimators”. Review of Economic studies, 72 (1), 1-19.

Abadie, A., and Dermisi, S. (2008): “Is terrorism eroding agglomeration economies in Central Business Districts? Lessons from the office real estate market in downtown Chicago”. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 451-463.

Ammermuller, A. (2007): “Poor Background or Low Returns? Why Immigrant Students in Germany perform so Poorly in the Programme for International Student Assessment”. Education Economics, 15, 215-230.

Benito, A. (2007): “La LOE ante el fracaso, la repetición y el abandono escolar”. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 43 (7).

Brunello, G., and Rocco, L. (2013): “The effect of immigration on the school performance of natives: cross country evidence using PISA test scores”. Economic of Education Review, 32, 234-246.

Calero, J., Choi, A., and Waisgrais, S. (2009): “Determinantes del rendimiento educativo del alumnado de origen nacional e inmigrante”. Cuadernos Económicos del ICE, 78, 281-311.

Calero, J., and Waisgrais, S. (2009): “Rendimientos educativos de los alumnos inmigrantes: identificación de la incidencia de la condición de inmigrante y de los peer-effects”. XVI Meeting of Public Economic, Granada.

Cebrián, J. A., Bodega, M. I., Martín-Lou, M. A., and Guajardo, F. (2010): “La crisis económica internacional y sus repercusiones en España y en su población inmigrante”. Estudios Geográficos, 71(268), 67-101.

Chaudhury, N., and Parajuli, D. (2010): “Conditional cash transfers and female schooling: the impact of the female school stipend programme on public school enrolments in Punjab, Pakistan”. Applied Economics, 42(28), 3565-3583.

Dynarski, S. (2002): “The Behavioral and Distributional Implications of Aid for College”. The American Economic Review, 92 (2), 279-285.

Driesen, J. M. W. Geert (2000): “Ethnicity, Forms of Capital and Educational Achievement”. International Review of Education, 47(6), 513-538.

Eissa, N., and Liebmand, J. B. (1996): “Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 605–637.

Entorf, H., and Minoiu, N. (2005): “What a Difference Immigration Policy Makes: A Comparison of PISA Scores in Europe and Traditional Countries of Immigration”. German Economic Review, 6(3), 355-376.

Frick, J. R., and Wagner, G. (2001): “Economic and Social Perspectives of Immigrant Children in Germany”, IZA Discussion Paper, n. 301, IZA, Bonn.

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P., Treiman, J., and De Leeuw, J. (1992): “A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status”. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1-56.

Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., and Vermeersch, C.M.J. (2011): Impact evaluation in practice. World Bank. Washington, D.C.

Jimerson, S. R., Anderson, G. E., and Whipple, A. D. (2002): “Winning the battle and losing the war: Examining the relation between grade retention and dropping out of high school”. Psychology in the Schools, 39(4), 441-457.

Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., and Samad, H. A. (2010): Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. World Bank. Washington, D.C.

Meyer, B. D. (1995): “Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics”. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics, 13 (2), 151-161.

OECD (1999): Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2004): Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2005): PISA 2003 Data Analysis Manual. SPSS users. Paris: OECD

OECD (2009): PISA Data analysis manual. SPSS SECOND EDITION. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2010): PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2011): How are school systems adapting to increasing numbers of immigrant students?. PISA IN FOCUS. Paris: OECD.

Puente, S., and Sánchez, P. (2010): “Evolución reciente de la población en España y proyecciones a corte y largo plazo”. Boletín Económico, Banco de España, 2, 45-54.

Ravallion, M. (2008): “Evaluating Anti-poverty Programs”. In Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 4, ed. T. Paul Schultz and John Strauss, 3787–846. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Roderick, M. (1994): “Grade retention and school dropout: Investigating the association”. American Educational Research Journal, 31 (4), 729-759.

Rutkowski, L., González, E., Joncas, M., and Von Davier, M. (2010): “International Large-Scale Assessment Data: Issues in Secondary Analysis and Reporting”. Educational Researcher, 39 (2), 142-151.

Salinas, J., and Santín, D. (2012): “Selección escolar y efectos de la inmigración sobre los resultados académicos españoles en PISA 2006”. Revista de Educación, 358, 382-405.

Schlotter, M., Schwerdt, G., and Woessmann, L. (2011): “Econometric methods for causal evaluation of education policies and practices: a non-technical guide”. Education Economics, 19(2), 109-137.

Schnepf, V. S. (2008): “Inequality of Learning amongst Immigrant Children in Industrialized Countries”. IZA Discussion Paper 3337.

Turner, R. (2006): “El Programa Internacional para la Evaluación de los Alumnos (PISA). Una perspectiva general”. Revista de Educación, Madrid, nº extra., 45-74.

Zinovyeva, N., Felgueroso, F., and Vázquez, P. (2009): “Inmigración y resultados educativos en España”, Efectos económicos de la inmigración en España. Jornadas sobre inmigración, I Informe FEDEA, Madrid, Marcial Pons, pp. 139-178.