Appraising the benefits of bottleneck removal in rail transport: a simplified CBA approach

Beria, Paolo and Grimaldi, Raffaele (2013): Appraising the benefits of bottleneck removal in rail transport: a simplified CBA approach.

Abstract

The removal of infrastructure bottlenecks is widely considered among the most profitable interventions, in socio-economic terms, and rail transport is not an exception. However, as outlined for example by RailPAG (2005), the measurement of the related benefits is difficult and no specific manuals indications seem to exist. From a general point of view, by removing a rail bottleneck we expect at least two kinds of benefits: direct benefits to transport users and external benefits to the rest of society (environmental externalities, accidents and congestion) due to the avoidance of possible shift to more impactful transport modes. The first effect is particularly hard to correctly evaluate, especially without a complete transport model, and thus CBAs currently performed might often result biased. The aim of this paper is to propose a simplified approach to estimate the effects of a capacity constraints for a simple rail network, and assess its removal through a CBA. In the first part, we briefly analyse the transport economics literature on the issue. In the following we introduce the proposed methodology, based on the use of a standard logit model, to measure the rail users’ generalised costs with and without the capacity constraint, and the consequent users and social surplus variation. The model is specified initially for a single link and then extended to a more complex network. Then, we outline the other elements to be included into a CBA in addition to surplus variation: rail service performance improvements, external costs associated to road shift and possible wider economic effects. We also discuss the effect of regulation in the distribution of calculated surplus variations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cost Benefit Analysis; bottleneck; rail; saturation; assessment; infrastructure
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R41 - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion ; Travel Time ; Safety and Accidents ; Transportation Noise; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning

References

Abelson, P. and P. Hensher. 2001. “Induced travel and user benefits: clarifying definitions and measurement for urban road infrastructure,” in Hensher D. and K. Button (eds.): Handbook of transport systems traffic control, Handbooks in Transport 3. Elsevier, Pergamon;

Cascetta, E. (2001). Transportation systems engineering: theory and methods, Vol. 49, Springer.

CE Delft (2008). Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector. Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT). Version, 1.

DfT (2013), Transport Analysis Guidance, Department for Transport, London (UK). Website: http://www.dft.gov.uk/webtag

EC-EIB (2005), RailPAG: Railway Project Appraisal Guidance, European Commission and European Investment Bank.

Eliasson, J., & Borjesson, M. (2012). On timetable assumptions in railway investment appraisal. In Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting(No. 12-2124).

Jorge, J., D., & de Rus, G. (2004), “Cost–benefit analysis of investments in airport infrastructure: a practical approach”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 311–326.

Kidokoro Y. (2004). Cost benefit analysis for transport networks. Theory and application. Journal of transport Economics and Policy, vol. 38, part 2, 275-307.

Nash, C., & Sansom, T. (1999). Calculating transport congestion and scarcity costs. Final Report of the Expert Advisers to the High Level Group on Infrastructure Charging. Commission of European Communities, Brussels.

Network Rail (2009), New Lines Program: Strategic Business Case, Planning and Regulation, Route Planning, London (UK).

Nilsson, J. E. (2012). Congestion and scarcity in scheduled transport modes. CTS Working paper No. 2012: 25. CTS-Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).

Hylén, B., Kauppila, J., & Chong, E. (2013), Road Haulage Charges and Taxes: Summary analysis and data tables 1998-2012, Discussion Paper 2013 – 08, OECD/ITF.SRA (2003), Sensitive Lorry Miles: Results of Analysis, Strategic Rail Authority, UK.

The World Bank (2005), Transport Note No. TRN-11: treatment of induced traffic, Notes on the Economic Evaluation of Transport Projects, Transport Notes, Transport Economics, Policy and Poverty Thematic Group, Washington, DC (USA).

Vickerman, R. (2007), Recent Evolution of Research into the Wider Economic Benefits of Transport Infastructure Investments, Discussion Paper No. 2007-9, ITF-OECD Joint Research Centre.