Expectations-Based Reference-Dependent Life-Cycle Consumption

Pagel, Michaela (2013): Expectations-Based Reference-Dependent Life-Cycle Consumption.

Abstract

I incorporate expectations-based reference-dependent preferences into a dynamic stochastic model to explain three major life-cycle consumption facts; the intuitions behind these three implications constitute novel connections between recent advances in behavioral economics and prominent ideas in the macro consumption literature. First, expectations-based loss aversion rationalizes excess smoothness and sensitivity in consumption, the puzzling empirical observation of lagged consumption responses to income shocks. Intuitively, in the event of an adverse shock, the agent delays painful cuts in consumption to allow his reference point to decrease. Second, the preferences generate a hump-shaped consumption profile. Early in life, consumption is low due to a first-order precautionary-savings motive, but as uncertainty resolves, this motive is dominated by time-inconsistent overconsumption, forcing consumption to decline toward the end of life. Third, consumption drops at retirement. When uncertainty is absent, the agent does not overconsume because he dislikes the associated certain loss in future consumption. Additionally, I obtain several new predictions about consumption; compare the preferences with habit formation, hyperbolic discounting, and temptation disutility; and structurally estimate the preference parameters.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Expectations-based reference-dependent preferences, life-cycle consumption, excess smoothness, excess sensitivity
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving

References

Abeler, J., A. Falk, L. Goette, and D. Huffman (2012). Reference Points and Effort Provision. American Economic Review 3939.

Aguiar, M. and E. Hurst (2005). Consumption versus Expenditure. Journal of Political Economy 113(5), 919–948.

Angeletos, G. M., D. Laibson, A. Repetto, and S. Weinberg (2001). The Hyperbolic Consumption Model: Calibration, Simulation, and Empirical Evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(3), 47.

Attanasio, O. (1998). Cohort Analysis of Saving Behavior by U.S. Households. Journal of Human Resources 33(3), 575–609.

Attanasio, O. (1999). Consumption. Handbook of Macroeconomics, Edited by J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford 1, 741–812.

Attanasio, O. and G. Weber (2010). Consumption and Saving: Models of Intertemporal Allocation and Their Implications for Public Policy. Journal of Economic Literature 48, 693–751.

Banks, J., R. Blundell, and S. Tanner (1998). Is There a Retirement-Savings Puzzle? American Economic Review 88(4), 769–788.

Barberis, N., M. Huang, and T. Santos (2001). Prospect Theory and Asset Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1).

Barseghyan, L., F. Molinari, T. O. Donoghue, and J. Teitelbaum (2010). The Nature of Risk Preferences: Evidence from Insurance Data. Working Paper.

Battistin, E., A. Brugiavini, E. Rettore, and G. Weber (2009). The Retirement Consumption Puzzle: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach. American Economic Review 99(5), 2209–26.

Benartzi, B. and R. Thaler (1995). Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 73–92.

Bernheim, D., J. Skinner, and S. Weinberg (2001). What Accounts for the Variation in Retirement Wealth Among U.S. Households? American Economic Review 91(4), 832–857.

Bowman, D., D. Minehart, and M. Rabin (1999). Loss Aversion in a Consumption-Savings Model. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38, 155–178.

Brunnermeier, M. and S. Nagel (2008). Do Wealth Fluctuations Generate Time-Varying Risk Aversion? Micro-Evidence on Individuals’ Asset Allocation. American Economic Review 98(3), 713–736.

Bucciol, A. (2012). Measuring Self-Control Problems: A Structural Estimation. Journal of the European Economic Association.

Calvet, L., J. Campbell, and P. Sodini (2009). Fight or Flight? Portfolio Rebalancing by Individual Investors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2, 301–348.

Campbell, J. and A. Deaton (1989). Why is Consumption So Smooth? The Review of Economic Studies 56(3), 357–373.

Carroll, C. (2011). Theoretical Foundations of Buffer Stock Saving. Working Paper Johns Hopkins University.

Carroll, C. D. (1997). Buffer Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXII, 1–56.

Carroll, C. D. (2001). Theoretical Foundations of Buffer Stock Saving. Working Paper, Johns Hopkins University.

Chetty, R. and A. Szeidl (2007). Consumption Commitments and Risk Preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(2), 831–877.

Chetty, R. and A. Szeidl (2010). Consumption Commitments: A Foundation for Reference-Dependent Preferences and Habit Formation. Working Paper.

Crawford, V. P. and J. Meng (2009). New York City Cabdrivers’ Labor Supply Revisited: Reference-Dependence Preferences with Rational-Expectations Targets for Hours and Income. University of California at San Diego Department of Economics Working Paper.

Deaton, A. (1985). Panel Data from Time Series of Cross-Sections. Journal of Econometrics 30, 109–126.

Deaton, A. (1986). Life-Cycle Models of Consumption: Is the Evidence consistent with the Theory? NBER Working Paper 1910.

Deaton, A. (1991). Saving and Liquidity Constraints. Econometrica 59, 1221–1248.

DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 315–372.

Disney, R. (1996). Can we Afford to Grow Old? Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Eisenhuth, R. (2012). Reference Dependent Mechanism Design. Job Market Paper.

Ericson, K. M. M. and A. Fuster (2010). Expectations as Endowments: Evidence on Reference-Dependent Preferences from Exchange and Valuation Experiments. mimeo.

Fernandez-Villaverde, J. and D. Krueger (2007). Consumption over the Life Cycle: Facts from Consumer Expenditure Survey Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89(3), 552–565.

Flavin, M. (1985). Excess Sensitivity of Consumption to Current Income: Liquidity Constraints or Myopia? The Canadian Journal of Economics 18(1), 117–136.

Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O’Donoghue (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 40(2), 351–401.

Fuhrer, J. C. (2000). Habit Formation in Consumption and Its Implications for Monetary-Policy Models. American Economic Review 90(3), 367–390.

Gill, D. and V. Prowse (2012). A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition. American Economic Review 102(1), 469–503.

Gollier, C. (2001). The Economics of Risk and Time. MIT Press.

Gourinchas, P.-O. and J. A. Parker (2002). Consumption over the Life Cycle. Econometrica LXX, 47–89.

Gul, F. and W. Pesendorfer (2004). Self-Control and the Theory of Consumption. Econometrica 72(4), 119–158.

Harris, C. and D. Laibson (2002). Hyperbolic Discounting and Consumption. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications 1, 258–298.

Heidhues, P. and B. Koszegi (2008). Competition and Price Variation when Consumers are Loss Averse. American Economic Review 98(4), 1245–1268.

Heidhues, P. and B. Koszegi (2010). Regular Prices and Sales. ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-10-008.

Herweg, F. and K. Mierendorff (2012). Uncertain Demand, Consumer Loss Aversion, and Flat-Rate Tariffs. Journal of the European Economic Association.

Herweg, F., D. Müller, and P. Weinschenk (2010). Binary Payment Schemes: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion. American Economic Review 100(5), 2451–2477.

Jappelli, T. and L. Pistaferri (2010). The Consumption Response to Income Changes. The Annual Review of Economics 2, 479–506.

Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98(6), 1325–1348.

Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 263–291.

Karle, H., G. Kirchsteiger, and M. Peitz (2011). The Impact of Contextual Reference Dependence on Purchase Decisions: An Experimental Study. mimeo.

Koszegi, B. and M. Rabin (2006). A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(4), 1133–1166.

Koszegi, B. and M. Rabin (2007). Reference-Dependent Risk Attitiudes. American Economic Review 97(4), 1047–1073.

Koszegi, B. and M. Rabin (2009). Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans. American Economic Review 99(3), 909–936.

Laibson, D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2), 443–477.

Laibson, D., A. Repetto, and J. Tobacman (2012). Estimating Discount Functions with Consumption Choices over the Lifecycle. American Economic Review.

Lucas, R. E. J. (1978). Models of Business Cycles. Basil Blackwell.

Ludvigson, S. C. and A. Michaelides (2001). Does Buffer-Stock Saving Explain the Smoothness and Excess Sensitivity of Consumption? American Economic Review 91(3), 631–647.

Meng, J. (2010). The Disposition Effect and Expectations as Reference Point. mimeo.

Michaelides, A. (2002). Buffer Stock Saving and Habit Formation. LSE and CEPR Working Paper.

Odean, T. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize their Losses? Journal of Finance 53, 1775– 1798.

Pagel, M. (2012). Expectations-based Reference-Dependent Preferences and Asset Pricing. Unpublished paper.

Pope, D. G. and M. E. Schweitzer (2011). Is Tiger Woods Loss Averse? Persistent Bias in the Face of Experience, Competition, and High Stakes. American Economic Review 101, 129–157.

Rabin, M. (2001). Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem. Econometrica 68(5), 1281–1292.

Reis, R. (2006). Inattentive Consumers. Journal of Monetary Economics 53, 1761–1800.

Rosato, A. (2012). Selling Substitute Goods to Loss-Averse Consumers: Limited Availability, Bargains and Rip-offs. Job Market Paper.

Schwerdt, G. (2005). Why does Consumption fall at Retirement? Evidence from Germany. Economics Letters 89, 300–305.

Shea, J. (1995). Union Contracts and the Life-Cycle/Permanent-Income Hypothesis. The American Economic Review 85(1), 186–200.

Sprenger, C. (2010). An Endowment Effect for Risk: Experimental Tests of Stochastic Reference Points. Working Paper.

Sydnor, J. (2010). (Over)insuring Modest Risks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2, 177–199.

Verbeek, M. (2007). Pseudo Panels and Repeated Cross-Sections. The Econometrics of Panel Data: Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Theory and Practice.