You can't always get what you want - East and West Germans' attitudes and preferences regarding the welfare state

Pfarr, Christian and Schmid, Andreas and Ulrich, Volker (2013): You can't always get what you want - East and West Germans' attitudes and preferences regarding the welfare state.

Abstract

More than twenty years after the fall of the iron curtain, do citizens from former Communist countries still exhibit attitudes and preferences with regard to the welfare state and income redistribution that differ from those in the West? This paper seeks to answer this question for Germany after reunification using not only survey data on attitudes but also evidence on preferences from a discrete choice experiment, both based on a representative sample. In a first step, we revisit the empirical evidence, compare our results to those of Alesina and Fuchs-Schündeln (2007) and test whether convergence of attitudes has yet been achieved. In a second step, we apply an advanced method to investigate preferences for redistribution in terms of willingness to pay. This framework is more in line with standard public choice theory as individuals are forced to overcome trade-offs and are exposed to take their inherent budget constraint into account when voicing their opinion on redistribution. The results are quite mixed. While East Germans seem to desire a higher amount of redistribution than West Germans, they are not willing to contribute more through taxation. This finding has important implications for social policy in reunified Germany.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Income redistribution; preferences; willingness to pay
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P26 - Political Economy ; Property Rights

References

Alesina, A. and Angeletos, G.-M. (2005), Fairness and Redistribution, in: The American Economic Review 95 [4], pp. 960–980.

Alesina, A., Cozzi, G. and Mantovan, N. (2012), The Evolution of Ideology, Fairness and Redistribution, in: The Economic Journal 122 [565], pp. 1244–1261.

Alesina, A. and Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2007), Good Bye Lenin (or not?), The Effect of Communism on People's Preferences, in: American Economic Review 97 [4], pp. 1507–1528.

Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford Uni-versity Press, Oxford.

Alesina, A., Glaeser, E. and Sacerdote, B. (2001), Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?, in: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2001 [2], pp. 187–254.

Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2005), Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities, in: Journal of Public Economics 89 [5-6], pp. 897–931.

Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M. and Hanley, N. (2002), Economic valuation with stated preference techniques, A manual, Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bech, M., Kjær, T. and Lauridsen, J. (2011), Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment, in: Health Economics 20 [3], pp. 273–286.

Becker, K. (2006), Flexibilisierungsmöglichkeiten in der Krankenversicherung, Kovač, Hamburg.

Bekker-Grob, E. W. de, Ryan, M. and Gerard, K. (2012), Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature, in: Health Economics 21 [1], pp. 145–172.

Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2006), Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 [2], pp. 699–746.

Ben-Akiva, M. and Lermann, S. R. (1985), Discrete choice analysis, Theory and applications to travel demand, MIT Press, Cambridge.

BMAS - Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (2011), Sozialbudget 2010, Berlin.

Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A.-H. and Tabellini, G. (2001), Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens, in: Economic Policy 16 [32], pp. 7–50.

Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A.-H. and Tabellini, G. (2002), Pension Reforms and the Opinions of European Citi-zens, in: The American Economic Review 92 [2], pp. 396–401.

Boes, S. and Winkelmann, R. (2006), Ordered Response Models, in: Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 90, pp. 167–181.

Boxall, P. C. and Adamowicz, W. L. (2002), Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Mod-els: A Latent Class Approach, in: Environmental and Resource Economics 23 [4], pp. 421–446.

Broadbent, C. D. (2012), Hypothetical Bias, Consequentiality and Choice Experiments, in: Economics Bulletin 32 [3], pp. 2490–2499.

Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (2008), Microeconometrics, Methods and applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

Carson, R. T., Louviere, J. J., Anderson, D. A., Arabie, P., Bunch, D. S., Hensher, D. A., Johnson, R. M., Kuhfeld, W. F., Steinberg, D., Swait, J., Timmermans, H. and Wiley, J. B. (1994), Experimental Analaysis of Choice, in: Marketing Letters 5 [4], pp. 351–368.

Corneo, G. (2001), Inequality and the State: Comparing US and German Preferences, in: Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 63-64, pp. 283–296.

Corneo, G. (2004), Wieso Umverteilung? Einsichten aus ökonometrischen Umfrageanalysen, in: Brunner, J. K. und Genser, B. (Ed.), Finanzpolitik und Umverteilung, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Bd. N.F., 301, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 55–88.

Corneo, G. and Grüner, H. P. (2000), Social Limits to Redistribution, in: American Economic Review 90 [5], pp. 1491–1507.

Corneo, G. and Grüner, H. P. (2002), Individual preferences for political redistribution, in: Journal of Public Economics 83 [1], pp. 83–107.

Deutsche Rentenversicherung (2012), Aktuelle Daten 2012, Berlin.

Fong, C. (2006), Prospective Mobility, Fairness, and the Demand for Redistribution, Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

Gegax, D. and Stanley, L. R. (1997), Validating Conjoint and Hedonic Preference Measures: Evidence from Valuing Reductions in Risk, in: Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 36 [2], pp. 31–54.

Guillaud, E. (2012), Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries, in: Journal of Eco-nomic Inequality online first doi: 10.1007s10888-011-9205-0.

Hanemann, M. (1983), Marginal Welfare Measures for Discrete Choice Models, in: Economics Letters 13 [1], pp. 129–136.

Hole, A. R. (2007), A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures, in: Health Economics 16 [8], pp. 827–840.

Johnson, R. F. and Desvousges, W. H. (1997), Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34 [1], pp. 78–99.

Kanninen, B. J. (2002), Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments, in: Journal of Marketing Research 39 [2], pp. 214–227.

Kuhfeld, W. F. (2006), Construction of Efficient Designs for Discrete-Choice-Experiments, in: Grover, R. und Vriens, M. (Ed.), The handbook of marketing research, Uses, misuses, and future advances, Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, Calif., pp. 312–363.

Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D. and Garratt, M. (1994), Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications, in: Journal of Marketing Research XXXI, pp. 545–557.

Kuhn, A. (2013), Inequality Perceptions, Distributional Norms, and Redistributive Preferences in East and West Germany, in: German Economic Review online first doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2012.00577.x.

Lancaster, K. J. (1966), A New Approach to Consumer Theory, in: Journal of Political Economy 74 [2], pp. 132–157. Lancaster, K. J. (1971), Consumer demand, A new approach, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

Lancsar, E. and Louviere, J. (2006), Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?, in: Health Economics 15 [8], pp. 797–811.

Lancsar, E., Louviere, J. J. and Flynn, T. N. (2007), Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments, in: Social Science & Medicine 64 [8], pp. 1738–1753.

Long, J. S. (1997), Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, Calif.

Louviere, J. J. and Hensher, D. A. (1982), Design and Analysis of Simulated Choice or Allocation Experiments in Travel Choice Modelling, in: Transportation Research Record 890, pp. 11–17.

Louviere, J. J. and Street, D. J. (2000), Stated-Preference Methods, in: Hensher, D. A. und Button, K. (Ed.), Handbook of transport modelling, 1. Aufl., Pergamon, New York, pp. 131–143.

Louviere, J. J. and Woodworth, G. (1983), Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregated Data, in: Journal of Marketing Research 20 [4], pp. 350–367.

Luttmer, E. F. P. and Singhal, M. (2011), Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution, in: American Eco-nomic Journal: Economic Policy 3 [1], pp. 157–179.

Manski, C. F. (1977), The Structure of Random Utility Models, in: Theory and Decision 8, pp. 229–254.

McFadden, D. (1974), Conditional Logit Analysis of Quantitative Choice Behavior, in: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–142.

McFadden, D. (1981), Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, in: Manski, C. F. und McFadden, D. (Ed.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 198–272.

Mørkbak, M. R., Olsen, S. B., Denver, S. and Campbell, D. (2012), Will providing a real economic incentive make respondents behave differently? An empirical choice experiment investigation, Presentation at the 2nd Danish Choice Modelling Days, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.

Neustadt, I. (2011), Do Religious Beliefs Explain Preferences for Income Redistribution? Experimental Design, in: CESifo Economic Studies 57 [4], pp. 623–652.

Neustadt, I. and Zweifel, P. (2010a), Economic Well-Being, Social Mobility, and Preferences for Income Redis-tribution: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment, Working Paper, Nr. 0909, Universität Zürich, Zürich.

Neustadt, I. and Zweifel, P. (2010b), Is the Welfare State Sustainable?, Experimental Evidence on Citizens' Pref-erences for Redistribution, CESifo Working Paper Public Choice, Nr. 3148, Ifo, Munich.

Ockenfels, A. and Weimann, J. (1999), Types and Patterns: an experimental East-West-German comparison of cooperation and solidarity, in: Journal of Public Economics 71, pp. 275–287.

Olivera, J. (2012), Preferences for redistribution in Europe, Geary WP, Nr. 2012/25, University of Dublin, Dublin.

Pekelman, D. and Sen, S. K. (1979), Measurement and Estimation of Conjoint Utility Functions, in: The Journal of Consumer Research 5 [4], pp. 263–271.

Pfarr, C. (2012), Meltzer-Richard and social mobility hypothesis: revisiting the income-redistribution nexus using German choice data, Discussion Paper, Nr. 10-12, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth.

Pfarr, C. (2013), Einkommen, Mobilität und individuelle Präferenzen für Umverteilung, Ein Discrete-Choice-Experiment, Beiträge zur Finanzwissenschaft, Bd. 30, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.

Phillips, K. A., Maddala, T. and Johnson, R. F. (2002), Measuring Preferences for Health Care Interventions Using Conjoint Analysis: An Application to HIV Testign, in: Health Services Research 37 [6], pp. 1681–1705.

Rainer, H. and Siedler, T. (2008), Subjective Income and Employment Expectations and Preferences for Redis-tribution, in: Economic Letters 99 [3], pp. 449–453.

Statistisches Bundesamt (2011), Statistisches Jahrbuch 2011, Wiesbaden.

Statistisches Bundesamt (2012), Statistisches Jahrbuch 2012, Deutschland und Internationales, Wiesbaden.

Stichnoth, H. (2012), Does Immigration Weaken Natives' Support for the Welfare State? Evidence from Germany, in: Public Choice 151 [3-4], pp. 631–654.

Suhrcke, M. (2001), Preferences for Inequality: East vs. West, Innocenti Working Paper, Nr. 89, Florenz.

Telser, H. (2002), Nutzenmessung im Gesundheitswesen, Die Methode der Discrete-Choice-Experimente, Kovac, Hamburg.

Train, K. E. (2009), Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.

Vroomen, J. M. and Zweifel, P. (2011), Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German?, in: European Journal of Health Economics 12 [1], pp. 87–95.