Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox

Cassi, Lorenzo and Plunket, Anne (2013): Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox.

Abstract

This paper investigates how network relations, proximity and their interplay affect collaboration and their inventive performance. Using patent citations as a proxy for patent quality, we investigate how the network and proximity characteristics of co-inventors enable them to access different sources of knowledge, in different geographical and organizational contexts, and finally affect the quality of inventive collaboration. Our findings enable to address the proximity paradox, which states that proximity facilitates collaboration and knowledge sharing, but it does not necessarily increase innovative performance, too much proximity may even harm innovation (Boschma and Frenken, 2009; Broekel and Boschma, 2011).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social networks, geographical proximity, technological proximity, co-patenting, network formation.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L65 - Chemicals ; Rubber ; Drugs ; Biotechnology; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

References

Agrawal, A. & Kapur, D. & McHale, J., (2008), How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data, Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 258-269.

Albert, M.B., D. Avery, F. Narin, P. McAllister. (1991). Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents. Research Policy. 20(3) 251- 259.

Autant-Bernard C., Billand P., Frachisse D. and Massard N. (2007), Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies, Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), pages 495-519

Bathelt H., Malmberg A. and Maskell P. (2004), Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation Progress in Human Geography, 28: 31-56

Baum J.A.C, McEvily B., and Rowley T.J. (2012), Better with Age? Tie Longevity and the Performance Implications of Bridging and Closure, Organization Science, 23:529-546

Boschma, R. A. (2005): Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

Boschma, R.A. and Frenken, K. (2009): The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks. A Proximity Perspective. In: Boschma, R.A., Martin, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, chapter 5.

Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2009), Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows, Journal of Economic Geography 9(4), 439-468.

Broekel, T. and Boschma, R. (2011), Knowledge Networks in the Dutch Aviation Industry - The Proximity Paradox, Journal of Economic Geography, (forthcoming)

Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press

Carayol N. and Cassi L. (2009), Who’s Who in Patents. A Bayesian approach, Université paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, hal-00631750, HAL.

Cassi L. and Plunket A. (2012), Research collaboration in co-inventor networks: combining closure, bridging and proximities, Regional Studies, under review

Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (2005), Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, N. Y

Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.

Coleman, J. S. (1988), Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, The American Journal of Sociology 94, S95--S120.

Fafchamps, M., Goyal, S. and van der Leij, M. J. (2010), Matching and Network Effects, Journal of the European Economic Association 8(1), 203—231

Fleming, L., Mingo S. and Chen D. (2007), Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly 52(3): 443-475.

Fornahl, D., Broekel, T. & Boschma, R. (2011), What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location, Papers in Regional Science, 395-418.

Gambardella, A., Harhoff, D., Verspagen, B. (2008). The Value of European Patents, European Management Review, 5(2), 69-84

Gargiulo, M. and Benassi, M. (2000), Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital, Organizational Science 11(2), 183-196.

Gilsing V., Nooteboom B., Vanhaverbeke W., Duysters G. and A. van den Oord, (2008), Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density, Research Policy, 37(10), 1717-1731

Jaffe, A. B. (1989), Real Effects of Academic Research, The American Economic Review 79(5), 957-970. King, G., Zeng, L., 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis 9, 137–163

Harhoff, D., Scherer, F.M., Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights - Evidence from Germany. Research Policy 32: 1343-1363.

Laurens, P., Zitt, M. and Bassecoulard, E. (2010), Delineation of the genomics field by hybrid citation-lexical methods: interaction with experts and validation process, Scientometrics 82(3), 647-662.

Maggioni, M. A. Nosvelli, M. and Uberti, T.E. (2007), Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis, Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 471-493

Martinez, C. (2010), “Insight into Different Types of Patent Families”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2010/02, OECD Publishing

Mowery D.C., Oxley J.E. and Silverman B.S. (1998), Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm, Research Policy, 27 (5) 507-523

Moody, J. (2000), SPAN: SAS Programs for Analyzing Networks. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Nooteboom B., Van Haverbeke W., Duysters G., Gilsing V. van den Oord A (2007), Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity, Research Policy, 36 (7),

Obstfeld D. (2005), Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100-130

OECD (2009), OECD Patent Statistics Manual, http://www.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/display.asp?sf1=identifiers&st1=9789264056442

Ponds, R., Van Oort, F. and Frenken, K. (2007), The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration, Papers in Regional Science 86(3), 423-443.

Reagans R. and McEvily B . (2003) Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267

Rowley T., Behrens D. and Krackhardt D. (2000) Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369–386

Singh, J. (2005), Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns, Management Science 51(5), 756-770

Sorenson O., Rivkin J.W. and Fleming L. (2006), Complexity, networks and knowledge flows, Research Policy, 35, 994-1017

Ter Wal A. (2011), The Dynamics of the Inventor Network in German Biotechnology: Geographical proximity and Triadic Closure, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 11.02

Tomz, M., 1999. Relogit (Stata ado file). Available at http://www.stanford.edu/~tomz/software/software.shtml

Torre, A. and Rallet, A. (2005), Proximity and localization, Regional Studies 39(1), 47-59.

Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21(1): 172-187

Trajtenberg, M., R. Henderson and A. Jaffe (1997), “University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 5 (1), pp. 19-50.

Wittington K.B., Owen-Smith J. and Powell W.W. (2009), Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive industries, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54:90-122