On beta and sigma convergence of Czech regions

Mazurek, Jiří (2013): On beta and sigma convergence of Czech regions.

Abstract

The aim of the article is to examine beta and sigma convergence of fourteen Czech regions during 1995-2009. Using real GDP per capita panel data from the Czech Statistical Office it was found that Czech regions σ-diverged in the period and this divergence was accelerating in time regardless of whether the capital city Prague was included among regions or not. Also, statistically significant β-divergence was present during the same period. There are two main possible reasons for the divergence: inequalities in foreign and domestic investments as well as the accumulation of human and physical capital in the most attractive regions, while less competitive regions were left behind. Policy implications necessary to reverse the situation include government’s support of investments in poorer regions and also gaining more financial resources from European ESF and ERDF funds.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: β-convergence Czech Republic; Czech regions; divergence; GDP per capita; σ-convergence

References

Barro, R. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy (100), pp. 223-251.

Barro, R, Salla-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. McGraw-Hill.

Boldrin M., Canova F. (2001). Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy, 32, pp. 205-245.

Czech Statistical Office. (2011). http:/www.czso.cz/.

Evans, P., Karras, G. (1996a). Do Economies Converge? Evidence from a Panel of U.S. States. Review of Economics and Statistics (78), pp. 384-388.

Evans, P., Karras, G. (1996b). Convergence Revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics (37), pp. 249-265.

Evans, P. (1997). How Fast Do Economies Converge? Review of Economics and Statistics (36), pp. 219-225.

Portál inovace. (2011). http://www.portal-inovace.cz/cz/technologicky-profil-lk/zahranicni-obchod/zahranicni-investice/

Islam, N. (1995). Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics (110), pp. 1127-1170.

Marelli, E. (2007). Specialisation and Convergence of European Regions. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 4, n. 2, pp. 149-178.

Nevima, J., Melecký, L. (2011). The β-Convergence Analysis of the Visegrad Four NUTS 2 Regions. In Mathematical Models and Methods in Modern Science. Puerto De La Cruz, Tenerife, Spain: WSEAS Press, pp. 48-53.

Novotný, J. (2010). Regionální ekonomická konvergence, divergence a další aspekty distribuční dynamiky evropských regionů v období 1992-2006, Politická ekonomie 2, pp. 166-184

Ondoš, S. (2011). The Question of Regional Convergence in the Central European Economies. Region Direct – European Regional Science Association, pp. 1-18.

Quah, D.T. (1997). Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization and Convergence Clubs. Journal of Economic Growth (2), pp. 27-59.

Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence. European Economic Review (40), pp. 1325-1352.

Smrčková, G., Vlček, I., Cvengroš, F. Reálná konvergence – souvislosti a příčiny. Výzkumná studie Ministerstva Financí ČR, 3/2008.

Young, A. T., Higgins, M. J., Levy, D. (2004). Sigma-Convergence versus Beta-Convergence: Evidence from U.S. County-Level Data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40, n. 5, pp. 1083-1093.