Developing a Territorial Approach for the CAP

Mantino, Francesco (2011): Developing a Territorial Approach for the CAP. Published in: (May 2011)

Abstract

In the context of the recent debate on the objectives, measures and funding of a post-2013 CAP, there is growing consensus that one of the rationales of a future policy will be to support the provision of public goods. As a contribution to this debate, the paper draws on several case study examples to illustrate where the territorial approach has been effective in supporting both the provision of environmental public goods and the generation of direct and second order social and economic effects. These include opportunities for rural tourism,recreation and the development of local markets, which over time, have generated further opportunities for public and private investments. In one example in which these positive linkages are very much in evidence, the territorial approach has been operationalised through the Italian LAG Delta 2000, and reinforced through subsequently securing a range of additional financial resources (regional incentives, ESF within EQUAL, cooperation programmes, EU youth programme and Cultura 2000).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Common Agricultural Policy, Public goods, regional policy, territorial cohesion
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy

References

Arkleton Insitute for Rural Development Research (2004): The territorial Impact of CAP and Rural Development Policy, ESPON Project 2.1.3.

Barca Fabrizio, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Huber, Commissioner for Regional Policy, April, Bruxelles.

Berriet-Solliec M., Déprés C., Vollet D. (2003): La multifunctionalitè de l’agriculture entre efficacité et équité. Le cas des Contracts Territoriaux d’Exploitation en Auvergne, Economie Rural, n. special multifunctionalité.

Berriet-Solliec M., Déprés C., Trouvé A. (2005): La territorialisation de la politique agricole en France. Vers un renuovellement de l’intervention publique en agriculture ?, CESAR Working Paper, n.6

Buller H. (2000): Re-Creating Rural Territories: LEADER in France, in Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40. No.2, April, pp. 190-199.

Bureau J.C., Mahé L.P. (2008) : CAP Reform beyond 2013 : An idea for a longer view, Notre Europe, Studies & Research, n.64

CNASEA (2003) : L’application du règlement de development rural en Europe, Les chaiers du CNASEA, Paris.

CNASEA-INEA (2007) : Quelles orientation pour le development rural, étude realisée par CRITICA, Bruxelles, October.

Commission of the European Communities (2008) : Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength, COM (2008) 616 final, Bruxelles.

Commission of the European Communities (2008) : Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, COM (2008) 616 final, Bruxelles.

Di Iacovo F., O’Connor D. (ed.) (2009): Supporting policies for Social Farming in Europe. Progressing Multifunctionality in Responsive Rural Areas, ARSIA (Agenzia Regionale per lo Sviluppo e l’Innovazione nel settore Agricolo-Forstale, Firenze.

Dwyer J. et al (2008): Review of Rural Development Instruments (DG Agri project 2006-G4-10), Final Report.

ECOTUR (2009): 6° Rapporto sul Turismo Natura, Edagricole-Il sole 24 ore, Bologna.

ECOTEC (2002): Thematic evaluation of the Territorial Employment Pacts, Final Report to the Directorate General regional Policy.

European Rural Network (2009): Targeting territorial specificities and needs in Rural Development Programmes, Thematic Working Group 1, Draft Step 1 Report, Bruxelles.

IEEP, 2008 : Case study : Agri-environment measures in the « Départements » of the Basse-Normandie Region, France.

IEEP-CCRU (2008) : The Environmental Contribution of Leader+ in the UK, Final Report, April, Land Use Policy Group, UK.

IRPET (2009a), Economia Grossetana nel 2008, Firenze, Ottobre.

IRPET (2009b), Le politiche regionali per lo sviluppo e l’agriturismo in Toscana, Studi per il Consiglio, n.3.

IRPET (2009c): Incidenza del turismo sull’economia regionale: stima del contributo effettivo ed esercizio di valutazione del potenziale, a cura di Stefano Rosignoli, Firenze

Land Use Policy Group (2009): Securing our Common Future through Environmentally Sustainable Land management, The LUPG Vision for the Future of the CAP post 2013.

Jouen M. (2007): European Rural Development Policy in questions. Introductive Paper to the Task Force 10, Notre Europe, September.

Jouen M. (2009): The keys to a European strategy for rural development, Notre Europe, June.

Knickel K., Peter S. (2005) : Amenity-led development of rural areas : The « Active Regions » pilot programme in Germany, in B. Haverkort, C. Reijntjes (eds.) Moving world views: Reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development. Compas series on Worldviews and Sciences, nr.4, Leusden (NL): Compas.

Leader Observatory (2008), A selection of the Leader+ Best Practices, Bruxelles.

Léger F., Vollet D., Urbano G. (2004) : Le CTE : un bilan en demi-teintes révélateur des tension de l’agriculture française ?, Les Cahiers de la multifunctionalité, n.7

Magnatti P., Ramella F., Trigilia C., Viesti G. (2005): Patti territoriali. Lezioni per lo sviluppo, Il Mulino, Bologna.

Mantino F. (2006): Integrated Rural Development Programmes and Projects: An Assessment of the Italian case, proceedings of the FAO Workshop on Innovative Experiences for rural development in the Latin America and Caribbean region, Rome, October.

Mantino F. (2009): Typologies of Governance Models, working package 3 – Rural Development policy delivery and governance, RuDI project, VII Research Programming Framework.

Mantino F., Bolli M., Fagiani P., Tarangioli S. (2009): Report on Policy Delivery Systems and their relations with types of governance models, working package 3 – Rural Development policy delivery and governance, RuDI project, VII Research Programming Framework.

Mantino F. (2010): New markets and Policies for Rural Areas in Europe, paper presented to the Conference on “Processi e politiche per lo Sviluppo Rurale in Brasile, Cina e nell’Unione Europea, Rome, 2-4 February,

Polman N., van der Schans J.W., Poppe K.J. and van der Ploeg J.D.. (2010) : Nested Markets and Common Pool Resources , paper presented to the Conference on “Processi e politiche per lo Sviluppo Rurale in Brasile, Cina e nell’Unione Europea, Rome, 2-4 February,

OECD (2006): The New Rural Paradigm. Policies and Governance, OECD Publications, Paris

ÖIR (2004): Methods for and Success of Mainstreaming Leader Innovations and Approach into rural Development Programs, Final Report.

Peter S., Knickel K. (2006): Empowerment of regional partnerships: The example of the Regional Action pilot programme in Germany, disp, 166, vol. 42 (3).

Shucksmith M. (2000): “Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in the UK”, in Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40. No.2, April, pp. 208-218.

Urbano G., Vollet D. (2005): L’évaluation du contract territorial d’exploitation (CTE), Notes et etudes économiques, n.22.

Trouvé A., Berriet-Solliec M., Déprés C. (2006): Charting and theorising the territorialisation of agricultural policy, Journal of Rural Studies, 23.

Trouvé A., Berriet-Solliec M. (2009): Analyse critique des territories de project. L’example des politiques de development rural, XLVIeme colloque de l’ASRDLF.