Private Industry and the Second Five-Year Plan:The Mundhra Episode as Exemplar of Capitalist Myopia

Tyabji, Nasir (2010): Private Industry and the Second Five-Year Plan:The Mundhra Episode as Exemplar of Capitalist Myopia. Published in: Economic and Political Weekly , Vol. 45, No. 32 : pp. 47-55.

Abstract

The resignation of T T Krishnamachari from the finance ministership in early 1958 was the culmination of three developments evolving concurrently. The first was the M C Chagla Commission of Enquiry Report, which ultimately led to Jawaharlal Nehru accepting Krishnamachari’s resignation. The second, the “Mundhra episode” was media managed with the encouragement of industrial interests who found that the controls established as part of the industrialisation drive accompanying the Second Five-Year Plan made serious and unacceptable inroads in private capitalist decision-making. The third development involved social engineering, a concerted effort to push the bearers of merchant and usurer capital towards industrial capitalist norms. This paper, based on contemporary records, argues that the more profound reasons for Krishnamachari’s fall was the “Rama Rau affair” of late 1956. It holds that the institutional subordination of the Reserve Bank of India was intended to mould monetary policy to the requirements of industrial development. It concludes that Krishnamachari tripped in attempting to coerce street-smart businessmen in control of industry to behave like true industrialists.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Mundhra Affair;Second Five Year Plan;T T Krishnamachari;Industrial Capital;Industrial Planning
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics; N - Economic History > N6 - Manufacturing and Construction > N65 - Asia including Middle East; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P26 - Political Economy ; Property Rights

References

Balachandran, G (1998): The Reserve Bank of India (Delhi: Oxford University Press).

Bettelheim, Charles (1971): India Independent (New York: Monthly Review Press).

Bhagwati, Jagdish N and Padma Desai (1970): India: Planning for Industrialisation (London: Oxford University Press).

Brimmer, Andrew (1955): “The Setting of Entrepreneurship in India”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 4.

Chakravarty, Sukhumoy (1989): Development Planning: The Indian Experience (Delhi: Oxford University Press).

Congress Party in Parliament (1967): Banking Institutions and Indian Economy: A Critical Review (Delhi: CPP).

Free Press Journal (1958): Mundhra Inquiry: The Full Story (Bombay, Free Press Journal).

India (1958): Report of the Life Insurance Corporation Inquiry [Chairperson Vivian Bose] (Delhi: Manager of Publications).

– (1963): Commission of Inquiry – Inquiry on the Administration of Dalmia – Jain Companies, 1956 – Report [Chairperson: S R Tendolkar, Vivian Bose] (Delhi: Manager of Publications).

Levkovsky, A I (1966): Capitalism in India: Basic Trends in its Development (Delhi: People’s Publishing House).

Shirokov, G K (1973): Industrialisation of India (Moscow: Progress Publishers).

Samant, D and M Mulky (1937): The Organisation and Finance of Industries in India (Calcutta: Longmans, Green and Co).

Tyabji, Nasir (2009): “Of Traders, Usurers and British Capital: Managing Agencies and the Dalmia Jain Case” in S R Hashim, K S Chalapati Rao, K V K Ranganathan and M R Murthy (ed.), Indian Industrial Development and Globalisation: Essays in Honour of Professor S K Goyal (New Delhi: Academic Foundation), pp 237-59.