Management of Offshore R&D in China : Cross Country Differences in Motivation and Performance

Motohashi, Kazuyuki (2012): Management of Offshore R&D in China : Cross Country Differences in Motivation and Performance. Published in: Institutions and Economies , Vol. 4, No. 2 (July 2012): pp. 101-120.

Abstract

In this paper, multinationals’ motivations for R&D in China are compared across firms’ home countries. It is found that five types of companies (Europe, Japan, the other Asia, US and Taiwan, Hong Kong or Macau owned) can be grouped into two. Europe, Japan and the other Asia for production/market driven R&D, but the degree of market orientation is stronger for European firms, followed by Japanese and the other Asia. Another group is US and THKM firms for technology/costdriven R&D. It should be noted that THKM firms are inclined toward production oriented R&D as well. We have also investigated the relationship between types of R&D activities and firms’ performances. In general, US firms are more profitable than Japanese ones, but this difference in profitability disappears once it is controlled for R&D type variables. In terms of an association of R&D type variables with profitability, heterogeneous results are obtained by host countries. The degree of linkage with universities and PRIs is significant for US firms, while the degree of R&D linkage with home country is important for European firms. It is also found that firm age is strongly correlated with profitability, while whether a firm is a joint venture with a local company or a wholly owned subsidiary does not make any difference.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: China; multinational corporation; offshore R&D; profitability
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes

References

Belderbos, R. (2001) “Overseas Innovations by Japanese Firms: An Analysis of Patent and Subsidiary Data”, Research Policy, 30(2): 313–32.

Cantwell, J. and Mudambi, R. (2005) “MNE Competence-creating Subsidiary Mandates”, Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109-1128.

Chen, S-H. (2004) “Taiwanese IT Firms’ Offshore R&D in China and the Connection with the Global Innovation Network”, Research Policy, 33(2): 337-349.

Chen, Y-C. (2007) “The Upgrading of Multinational Regional Innovation Networks in China”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 13(3): 373-403.

Chen, X. and Reger, G. (2006) “The Role of Technology in the Investment of German Firms in China”, Technovation, 26(3): 407-415.

Florida, R. (1997) “The Globalization of R&D: Results of a Survey of Foreign Affiliated R&D Laboratories in the USA”, Research Policy, 26(1): 85-103.

Gammeltoft, P. (2006) “Internationalization of R&D: Trends, Drivers and Managerial Challenges”, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 2(1-2): 177-199.

Ghemawat, P. (2007) Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in A World Where Differences Still Matter, Harvard Business School Press.

Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C. (1990) “The Multinational Enterprise as an Interorganizational Network”, Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603-625.

Iwasa, T. and Odagiri, H. (2004) “Overseas R&D, Knowledge Sourcing and Patenting: An Empirical Study of Japanese R&D Investment in the US”, Research Policy, 33(5): 807–28.

Jefferson, G.H., Hu, A.G.Z., Guan. X. and Yu, X. (2003) “Ownership, Performance, and Innovation in China’s Large and Medium-size Industrial Enterprise Sector”, China Economic Review, 14(1): 89-113.

Kuemmerle, W. (1999) “Foreign Direct Investment in Industrial Research in the Pharmaceutical and Electronics Industries: Results from a Survey of Multinational Firms”, Research Policy, 28(2): 179-193.

Motohashi, K. (2010) “R&D Activities of Manufacturing Multinationals in China: Structure, Motivations and Regional Differences”, China and World Economy, 18(6): 56-72.

Motohashi, K. and Xiao, Y. (2007) “China’s Innovation System Reform and Growing Industry and Science Linkages”, Research Policy, 36(8): 1251-1260.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002) Frascati Manual (6th ed.), Paris: OECD.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2005) UNCTAD Survey on the Internationalization of R&D: Current Patterns and Prospects on the Internationalization of R&D, Geneva: UNCTAD.

von Zedtwitz, M. and Gassmann, O. (2002) “Market versus Technology Drive in R&D Internationalization: Four Different Patterns of Managing Research and Development”, Research Policy, 31(4): 569-588.

Walsh, K. (2003) Foreign High-tech R&D in China: Risks, Rewards and Implications for US-China Relations, Washington DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center.

Wu, J. and Callahan, J. (2005) “Motive, Form and Function of International R&D Alliances: Evidence from the Chinese IT Industry”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16(2): 173-191.

Xue, L. and Wang, S. (2001) “Globalization of R&D by Multinational Corporations in China: An Empirical Analysis”, Paper presented at the Sino-US Conference on Technological Innovation, Beijing, April 24-26.