Arslan, Mesut Murat (2006): Optimal Monetary Policy in the Sticky Information Model of Price Adjustment: Inflation Targeting or Price-Level Targeting?
Download (302kB) | Preview
I investigate optimal monetary policy in the sticky information model of price adjustment within a New Keynesian macroeconomic framework. The model is solved for optimal policy, and welfare implications of three alternative monetary policy regimes: unconstrained policy, price-level targeting and inflation targeting, are compared when there is a shock to the economy. The results for a cost-push shock illustrate that optimal policy depends on the degree of price stickiness and the persistence of the shock. Inflation targeting is the optimal policy if prices are flexible enough or the shock is persistent enough. However, for a demand shock, inflation targeting emerges as the best policy for all values of the price stickiness and the shock's persistence. When the volatility of nominal interest rate is taken into consideration, the results indicate that inflation targeting is the best policy, in the sense that it results in smaller welfare loss and volatility of nominal interest rate, if prices are sticky enough and the persistence of the shock is large enough. However, price-level targeting might be preferable to inflation targeting if prices are more flexible and the relative weight for the volatility of nominal interest rate is large.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Middle East Technical University|
|Original Title:||Optimal Monetary Policy in the Sticky Information Model of Price Adjustment: Inflation Targeting or Price-Level Targeting?|
|Keywords:||Optimal policy; Sticky information; Inflation targeting; Price-level targeting|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General
|Depositing User:||M.Murat Arslan|
|Date Deposited:||11. Oct 2007|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 21:26|
 Arslan, M.M., 2005. Monetary Policy in a New Keynesian Framework with Stikcy Information Model of Price Adjustment. Mimeo, University of Houston.
 Ball, L., Mankiw, N.G., Reis, R., 2005. Monetary Policy for Inattentive Economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 52 (4), 703-725.
 Bernanke, B.S., Mihov, I., 1998. Measuring Monetary Policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3), 869-902.
 Blanchard, O.J., Kiyotaki, N., 1987. Monopolistic Competition and the Efects of Aggregate Demand. American Economic Review 77 (4), 647-666.
 Calvo, G., 1983. Staggered Prices in a Utility Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12 (3), 383-398.
 Chari, V.V., Kehoe, P.J., McGrattan, E.R., 2000. Stikcy Price Models of the Business Cycle: Can the Contract Multiplier Solve the Persistence Problem? Econometrica 68, 1151-1179.
 Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M., 1999. The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (4), 1661-1707.
 Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M., 2001. Optimal Monetary Policy in Open versus Closed Economies: An Integrated Approach. American Economic Review 91 (2), 253-257.
 Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M., 2002. A Simple Framework for International Monetary Policy Analysis. NBER Working Paper, 8870.
 Dixit, A.K., Stiglitz, J.E., 1977. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review 67 (3), 297-308.
 Gali, J., Monacelli, T., 2002. Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Mimeo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
 Mankiw, N.G., Reis, R., 2002. Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4), 1295-1328.
 McCallum, B.T., Nelson, E., 1999. An Optimizing IS-LM Specification for Monetary Policy and Business Cycle Analysis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 31, 296-316.
 Rotemberg, J., Woodford, M., 1997. An Optimization Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12, 297-346.
 Rotemberg, J., Woodford, M., 1999. Interest Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price Model. NBER Working Paper, 6618.
 Rudebusch, G.D., Svensson, L.E., 1999. Eurosytem Monetary: Lessons from U.S. Data. NBER Working Paper, 7179.
 Svensson, L.E., 1997. Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets. European Economic Review 41, 1111-1146.
 Svensson, L.E., 2002. Inflation Targeting: Should It Be Modeled as an Instrument Rule or a Targeting Rule? NBER Working Paper, 8925.
 Svensson, L.E., 2003. What is Wrong with Taylor Rules? Using Judgment in Monetary Policy through Targeting Rules. Journal of Economic Literature 41 (2), 426-478.
 Svensson, L.E., Woodford, M., 2003. Implementing Optimal Policy through Inflation Forecast Targeting. In: B. S. Bernanke and M. Woodford (Ed.), Inflation Targeting. University of Chicago, Chicago.
 Woodford, M., 1999. Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia. NBER Working Paper, 7261.
 Woodford, M., 2001. Inflation Stabilization and Welfare. NBER Working Paper, 8071.
 Woodford, M., 2003. Interest and Prices. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.