Identifying product attributes and consumer attitudes that impact willingness-to-pay for a nutraceutical-rich juice product

Lawless, Lydia J.R. and Drichoutis, Andreas and Nayga, Rodolfo and Threlfall, Renee T. and Meullenet, Jean-François (2012): Identifying product attributes and consumer attitudes that impact willingness-to-pay for a nutraceutical-rich juice product.

Abstract

A non-hypothetical Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) auction-like mechanism was utilized to determine consumer characteristics, attitudinal factors, and product sensory attributes that affect willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a nutraceutical-rich juice blend (75%Concord+12%Pomegranate+13%Black Cherry). Participants (n=228) were recruited for a BDM mechanism that included four treatment groups: Info (received a potential health statement), Taste (evaluated the sensory attributes of the juice blend), InfoTaste (evaluated the sensory attributes of the juice blend and received the potential health statement), and Control (neither tasted nor received the potential health statement about the juice blend). As part of the post-auction questionnaire, participants completed incentivized risk and time preference survey tasks. The participants’ average WTP for the nutraceutical-rich juice blend was $3.45/bottle. Average overall liking for all participants for the nutraceutical-rich juice was 7.42 (on a 9-point scale), which indicated general consumer acceptance. The time preference coefficient (-8.87) indicated that higher time discount rates (lower future orientation) were associated with lower WTP within the Info group. Risk preference did not affect WTP. WTP increased by $0.25 for every unit increase in sweetness toward just-about-right (JAR) on the 5-point scale, $0.20 per every unit decrease in black cherry flavor toward JAR, and $0.29 per every unit decrease in bitterness toward JAR. Non-hypothetical WTP mechanisms offer realistic valuations and alternative insights about consumers and products.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: experimental auction; risk aversion; time preference; just about right; willingness to pay; optimization
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General

References

ANDERSEN, S., HARRISON, G.W., LAU, M.I. and RUTSTROM, E.E. 2008. Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76, 583-618.

BECKER G.M., DEGROOT M.H., MARSCHAK J. 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav Sci 9 (3): 226–32.

BERNARD, J.C. and BERNARD, D.J. 2009. What Is It About Organic Milk? An Experimental Analysis. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 91, 826-836, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01258.x.

BOND, C.A., CULLEN, K.G. and LARSON, D.M. 2009. Joint estimation of discount rates and willingness to pay for public goods. Ecol. Econ. 68, 2751-2759, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.006.

CHENG, V.J., BEKHIT, A.E.A., SEDCOLE, R. and HAMID, N. 2010. The Impact of Grape Skin Bioactive Functionality Information on the Acceptability of Tea Infusions Made from Wine By-Products. J. Food Sci. 75, S167-S172, DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01576.x.

COLLER, M. and WILLIAMS, M.B. 1999. Eliciting Individual Discount Rates. Experimental Economics 2, 107-127, DOI: http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=102888.

DESMET, P.M.A. and SCHIFFERSTEIN, H.N.J. 2008. Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite 50, 290-301, DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.08.003.

DI MONACO, R., OLLILA, S. AND TUORILA, H. 2005. Effect of price on pleasantness ratings and use intentions for a chocolate bar in the presence and absence of a health claim. Journal of Sensory Studies 20: 1-16.

DOOLEY, L., THRELFALL, R.T. and MEULLENET, J.F. 2012. Optimization of blended wine quality through maximization of consumer liking. Food Quality and Preference 24, 40-47.

FREDERICK, S., LOEWENSTEIN, G. and O'DONOGHUE, T. 2002. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40, 351-401.

GADIOLI1, I.L., OLIVEIRA PINELI, L.L., DA SILVA QUINTILIANO RODRIGUES, J., CAMPOS, A.B. 2013. Evaluation of packing attributes of orange juice on consumers’ intention to purchase by conjoint analysis and consumer attitudes expectation. J. Sens. Stud. 28: 57–65, DOI: 10.1111/joss.12023.

ISADORA QUEIROZ GEROLIM and MARILEUSA D. CHIARELLO3 GOLDBERG, I., ROOSEN, J. and NAYGA, R.M., JR. 2009. Parental Response to Health Risk Information: Experimental Results on Willingness-To-Pay for Safer Infant Milk Formula. Health Econ. 18, 503-518, DOI: 10.1002/hec.1381.

HARRISON, G.W., LAU, M.I. and WILLIAMS, M.B. 2002. Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, pp. 1606-1617.

HARRISON, G.W., and RUTSTRÖM, E. E. 2008. Chapter 81 Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results 1, 752-767.

HOLT, C.A. and LAURY, S.K. 2002. Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 1644-1655.

JAEGER, S.R., LUSK, J.L., HOUSE, L.O., VALLI, C., MOORE, M., MORROW, B. and TRAILL, W.B. 2004. The use of non-hypothetical experimental markets for measuring the acceptance of genetically modified foods. Food Quality and Preference 15, 701-714, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.002.

JOHANNESSON, M. and JOHANSSON, P. 1997. Quality of life and the WTP for an increased life expectancy at an advanced age RID E-9680-2011. J. Public Econ. 65, 219-228, DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00014-5.

JOHANNESSON, M. and JOHANSSON, P. 1996. To be, or not to be, that is the question: An empirical study of the WTP for an increased life expectancy at an advanced age RID E-9680-2011. J. Risk Uncertainty 13, 163-174, DOI: 10.1007/BF00057866.

KING, S.C. and MEISELMAN, H.L. 2010. Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food. Qual. Prefer. 21, 168-177, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.005.

KUKOWSKI, A., MADDOCK, R., WULF, D., FAUSTI, S. and TAYLOR, G. 2005. Evaluating consumer acceptability and willingness to pay for various beef chuck muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 83, 2605-2610.

LANGE, C., MARTIN, C., CHABANET, C., COMBRIS, P. and ISSANCHOU, S. 2002. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: comparison with hedonic scores. Food. Qual. Prefer. 13, 597-608, DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00059-9.

Lawless, L.J.R., Threlfall, R.T., Meullenet, J.-F., Howard, L.R. (2013). Applying a mixture design for consumer optimization of black cherry, Concord grape, and pomegranate juice blends. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28, 102-112.

Lawless, L.J.R, Threlfall, R.T., Meullenet, J.-F. (2013). Using a choice design to screen nutraceutical-rich juices. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28, 113-124.

Lawless, L.J.R., Nayga Jr., R.M., Akaichi F., Meullenet J.-F., Threlfall, R.T., & Howard L.R. (2012a). Willingness-to-pay for a nutraceutical-rich juice blend. Journal of Sensory Studies 27, 375-383.

Lawless, L.J.R, Threlfall RT, Howard LR, Meullenet, J-F. (2012b). Sensory, compositional, and color properties of nutraceutical-rich juice blends. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63(4), 529-537.

LUND, C.M., JAEGER, S.R., AMOS, R.L., BROOKFIELD, P. and HARKER, F.R. 2006. Tradeoffs between emotional and sensory perceptions of freshness influence the price consumers will pay for apples: Results from an experimental market. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 41, 172-180, DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.03.011.

LUSK, J. and SHOGREN, J.F. 2008. Experimental auctions: methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge University Press.

MARKOSYAN, A., MCCLUSKEY, J.J. and WAHL, T.I. 2009. Consumer Response to Information about a Functional Food Product: Apples Enriched with Antioxidants. Can. J. Agric. Econ. -Rev. Can. Agroecon. 57, 325-341.

MAYNARD, L.J. and FRANKLIN, S.T. 2003. Functional foods as a value-added strategy: The commercial potential of "cancer-fighting" dairy products. Review of Agricultural Economics 25, 316-331.

NAYGA, R.M., JR. 2008. Nutrition, obesity and health: policies and economic research challenges. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 35, 281-302, DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbn013.

ONWEZEN, M.C. and BARTELS, J. 2011. Which perceived characteristics make product innovations appealing to the consumer? A study on the acceptance of fruit innovations using cross-cultural consumer segmentation. Appetite 57, 50-58, DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.03.011.

SEERAM, N.P., AVIRAM, M., ZHANG, Y., HENNING, S.M., FENG, L., DREHER, M. and HEBER, D. 2008. Comparison of antioxidant potency of commonly consumed Polyphenol-Rich beverages in the united states. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 1415-1422, DOI: 10.1021/jf073035s.

SHOGREN, J.F. 2006. Valuation in the lab. Environ. Resour. Econ. 34, 163-172, DOI: 10.1007/s10640-005-3785-8.

STEFANI, G., ROMANO, D. and CAVICCHI, A. 2006. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?. Food. Qual. Prefer. 17, 53-62, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.010.

SUNSTEIN, C.R. 2004. Lives, life-years, and willingness to pay. Columbia Law Rev. 104, 205-252.

UMBERGER, W. and FEUZ, D. 2004. The usefulness of experimental auctions in determining consumers' willingness-to-pay for quality-differentiated products. Rev. Agric. Econ. 26, 170-185, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00169.x.

XIONG, R. and MEULLENET, J. 2006. A PLS dummy variable approach to assess the impact of jar attributes on liking. Food. Qual. Prefer. 17, 188-198, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.006.

XUE, H., MAINVILLE, D., YOU, W. and NAYGA, R.M., JR. 2010. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for grass-fed beef: Empirical evidence from in-store experiments. Food. Qual. Prefer. 21, 857-866, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.004.