Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment

Larcinese, Valentino; Rizzo, Leonzio and Testa, Cecilia (2007): Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment. Unpublished.

Abstract

We analyze the relationship between senate malapportionment and the allocation of the US federal budget to the states during the period 1978-2002. A substantial literature originating from the in‡uential paper by Atlas et al. (1995), using a within estimation methodology …nds that small and overrepresented states get signi…cantly larger shares of federal funds. Revisiting the econometric speci…cation used by the current empiri- cal research, we show that the number of senators percapita is inappropriate to capture malapportionement in regressions using broad federal programs, and that the results ob- tained with this indicator are extremely non-robust to reasonable speci…cation changes. In particular, senators percapita have a signi…cant impact on federal spending only in re- gressions containing state …xed e¤ects. Furthermore, the coefficients estimated using the within methodology are statistically di¤erent across states and, therefore, cannot be used to assess spending differentials between states. The magnitude and signi…cance of those coe¢ cients suggest a within state-speci…c inverse relationship between broad spending categories and population which is not systematically related to the size of the states and seems more compatible with incrementalist theories of budget allocation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: University of Ferrara
• Language: English
• Keywords: federal budget; malapportionment; small state advantage; overrepresentation
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H61 - Budget; Budget Systems; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H59 - Other; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H76 - State and Local Government: Infrastructures; Procurement; Public Safety; Penal Systems; Other Expenditure Categories; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs

References

Ansolabehere, S., J. Gerber, and J. Snyder (2002). Equal votes, equal money: court-ordered redistricting and public expenditure in american states. American Political Science Re- view 96, 767–-777. Ansolabehere, S., J. Snyder, and M. M. Ting (2003). Bargaining in bicameral legislatures: when and why does malapportionment matters? American Political Science Review 97. Atlas, C. M., T. W. Gilligan, R. J. Hendershott, and M. A. Zupan (1995). Slicing the federal government net pie: Who wins, who looses and why. American Economic Review 85, 624–-629. Bickers, K. and R. Stein (1991),). Federal Domestic Outlays, 1983-1990: A Data Book. Dahl, R. A. (2002). How Democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven: Yale Uni- versity Press. Hauk, W. R. and R. Wacziag (2007). Small states, big pork. Quarterly Journal of political Science 2, 95–-106. Hoover, G. A. and P. Pecorino (2005). The political determinants of federal expenditure at the state level. Public Choice 123, 95–-113. Knight, B. (2004). Legislative representation, bargaining power, and the distribution of federal funds: Evidence from the us senate. NBER working paper 10385. Knight, B. (2005). Estimating the value of proposal power. American Economic Review 95, 1639-–1652. Larcinese, V., L. Rizzo, and C. Testa (2006). Allocating the us federal budget to the states: the impact of the president. Journal of Politics 68, 447–-456. Lee, F. E. (1998). Representation and public policy: The consequences of senate apportion- ment for the geographic distribution of federal funds. Journal of Politics 60, 34-–62. Madison, J. (1788). The Federalist or the new Constitution. London: Everyman Edition. Wallis, J. (1998). The political economy of new deal spending revisited, again: With and without nevada. Explorations in Economic History 38, 305–-314. Wildavsky, A. (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little Brown. Wright, G. (1974). The political economy of new deal spending: an econometric analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 30–38.