Can't See the Tacking for the Trees? Try a Coasian Solution

Beaulier, Scott and Mixon, Franklin and Cebula, Richard (2013): Can't See the Tacking for the Trees? Try a Coasian Solution. Published in: New Developments in Economic Education (24 March 2014): pp. 126-132.

Abstract

This note provides a modern story for principles instructors to use as a supplement to textbook accounts of problems associated with externalities and the applicability of the Coase theorem. Our story begins in July of 1988, when Larry Ellison paid $3.9 million for a home in the Pacific Heights neighborhood of San Francisco – a property that provided Ellison with a prized view of San Francisco Bay below. However, later, in 2004, a $6.9 million home below Ellison’s was purchased by Bernard and Jane von Bothmer. After taking ownership of the property below Ellison, the von Bothmers allowed three redwood trees and an acacia to grow by several feet. The redwood and acacia growth came at the expense of Ellison’s view: due to the taller trees, Ellison could no longer see San Francisco Bay from the third-story living room of his four-story home on the Bay. The story of Larry Ellison’s battle for a clear view of San Francisco Bay is a classic example of a property dispute that has the potential for settlement so long as rights are established. All of the key features for a Coasian bargain to work itself out are present: the ownership rights are clearly defined, transaction costs and communication costs are fairly low, and there are well established markets in tree services and land. The final outcome involved where resources—particularly Ellison’s uninhibited view of San Francisco Bay—flowed to the one valuing it most. This story gives scholars an opportunity to talk about the “Invariance Hypothesis” and the role that endowments and wealth play when Coasian bargains are made.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: externalities; pedagogy; Coasian solution; markets functioning
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate; K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K39 - Other; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K41 - Litigation Process; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P14 - Property Rights

References

Boyes, W., and Melvin, M. (2011) Economics, Mason, OH: South-Western.

Calabrisi, G. (1970) The Cost of Accidents, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Coase, R.H. (1960) “The problem of social cost,” Journal of Law & Economics, 3: 1-44.

Coase, R.H. (1988) The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Colander, D.C. (2010) Economics, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Kjar, S.A. (2009) “Using The Simpsons to teach Mengerian economics,” in Expanding Teaching and Learning Horizons in Economic Education, edited by F.G. Mixon, Jr. and R.J. Cebula, New York, NY: Nova Science, pp. 191-198.

Luccasen, R.A., and Thomas, M.K. (2010) “Simpsonomics: Teaching economics using episodes of The Simpsons,” Journal of Economic Education, 41: 136-149.

Mateer, G.D. (2009) “Recent film scenes for teaching introductory economics,” in Expanding Teaching and Learning Horizons in Economic Education, edited by F.G. Mixon, Jr. and R.J. Cebula, New York, NY: Nova Science, pp. 165-172.

McConnell, C.R., Brue, S.L., and Flynn, S.M. (2012) Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

McEachern, W.A. (2010) Micro Econ, Mason, OH: South-Western.

Pigou, A.C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan and Co.

Sexton, R. (2006) “Using short movie and television clips in the economics principles class,” Journal of Economic Education, 37: 406-417.

Watts, M. (2003) The Literary Book of Economics, Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.