Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Timing, Fragmentation of Work and Income Inequality - An Earnings Treatment Effects Approach

Merz, Joachim, Böhm, Paul and Burgert, Derik (2005): Timing, Fragmentation of Work and Income Inequality - An Earnings Treatment Effects Approach. Unpublished.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
368Kb

Abstract

Traditional welfare analyses based on money income needs to be broadened by its time dimension. In the course of time the traditional full-time work is diminishing and new labour arrangements are discussed (keyword: flexible labour markets). Our study is contributing to economic well-being by adding insights into particular work effort characteristics - the daily timing of work and its fragmentation - and its resulting income distribution.
With our focus on ‘who is working when within a day with which earnings consequences’ we go beyond traditional labour market analyses with its working time division into aggregated full and part time work, working hours spread across a week and weekend, life time working etc.
Whereas the first part of our study is describing the distribution of timing and fragmentation of daily work time
and its resulting income based on more than 35.000 diaries of the recent German Time Budget Survey 2001/2002, the second part of our study quantifies determinants of arrangement specific earnings functions detecting significant explanatory pattern of what is behind. The economic theory behind is a human capital approach in a market and non-market context, extended by non-market time use, the partner’s working condition, social networking as well as household and regional characteristics. The econometrics use a treatment effects type interdependent estimation of endogenous participation (selection) in a daily working hour pattern (self-selection)and pattern specific earnings function explanation.
The overall result: Individual earnings in Germany are dependent on and significant different with regard to the
daily working hour arrangement capturing timing and fragmentation of work time. Market and non-market
factors are important and significant in explaining earnings.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Language:English
Keywords:time use and inequality, timing and fragmentation of work time, working hour arrangements, labour supply, earnings explanation, human capital, market and non-market time use, time use diary data, treatment effects modelling, endogenous self-selection, German time budget survey 2001/2002
Subjects:J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Time Allocation, Work Behavior, and Employment Determination and Creation; Human Capital; Retirement > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Time Allocation, Work Behavior, and Employment Determination and Creation; Human Capital; Retirement > J24 - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Time Allocation, Work Behavior, and Employment Determination and Creation; Human Capital; Retirement > J23 - Employment Determination; Job Creation; Demand for Labor; Self-Employment
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J30 - General
ID Code:5972
Deposited By:Prof. Joachim Merz
Deposited On:28. Nov 2007 01:14
Last Modified:28. Nov 2007 01:14
References:Angrist, J.D. (2001), Estimation of Limited-Dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous
Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice, in: Journal of Business and Economic
Statistics, 29/1, 2-15
Atkinson, A.B. (1970), On the measurement of inequality, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244-63
Bauer, F., Groß, H., Munz, E. and S. Sayin (2001), Arbeits- und Betriebszeiten, Neue Formen des
betrieblichen Arbeits- und Betriebszeitmanagements, Düsseldorf.
Becker, G. (1975), Human Capital – A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to
Education, 2nd. Ed., National Bureau of Economic Research: Columbia University Press
Becker, G.S. (1965), A Theory of the Allocation of Time, in: Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
Blundell, R. and Th. MaCurdy (1999), Labour supply: a review of alternative approaches, in: Ashenfelter,
O. and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 3,, 1559-1695
Burtless, G. (1993), The contribution of employment and hours changes to family income inequality, in:
American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2
Büssing, A. and H. Seifert (1995), Sozialverträgliche Arbeitszeitgestaltung, München.
Clarkberg, M. and Ph. Moen (2000), Understanding the Time Squeeze: Married Couples Preferred and
Actual Work-Hour Strategies, in: American Behavioral Scientist, 44/7, 1115-1136.
Cowell, F.A. (1995), Measuring Inequality, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, 2nd. Ed.
Doiron, D. and J. Barrett (1996), Inequality in male and female earnings: the role of hours and wages, in:
The Review of Economics and Statistsics, Vol. LXXVIII, No. 3, 410-420
Ehling, M. (1999),The German Time Use Survey – Methods and Results, in: Merz, J. and M. Ehling
(eds.), Time Use – Research, Data and Policy, Publications of the Research Institute on
Professions (FFB) of the University of Lüneburg, , Vol. 10, Baden-Baden, 89-105.
Ehling, M., Holz, E. and I. Kahle (2001), Erhebungsdesign der Zeitbudgeterhebung 2001/2002, in:
Wirtschaft und SDtatsistik, 6, 427-436
Federal Statistical Office Germany (1992): Handbuch zu ‚Wo bleibt die Zeit ?’, Wiesbaden.
Garhammer, M. (1994), Balanceakt Zeit: Auswirkungen flexibler Arbeitszeiten auf Alltag, Freizeit und
Familie, Edition Sigma, Berlin.
Greene, W. (1998), LIMDEP Version 7/8, Plainview, New York, 1998/2002.
Greene, W. (2000), Econometric Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Greene, W. (2003), Econometric Analysis, 5th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Ham, J. C. (1982), Estimation of a Labour Supply Model with Censoring Due to Unemployment and
Underemployment, in: Review of Economic Studies, 69, 335-54.
Hamermesh, D. (1996a),The Timing of Work Time, in: Konjunkturpolitik, Applied Economics Quarterly,
42: 1 - 22.
Hamermesh, D. (1996b), Workdays, Workhours and Work Schedules, W. E. Upjohn Institute for
Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan.
Hamermesh, D. (1998), When we work, American Economic Review, 88: 321 - 325.
Hamermesh, D. (2002), Timing, togetherness and time windfalls, Journal of Population Economics, 15:
321 - 325.
Harvey, A. (1999), Time Use Research: The Roots to the Future, , in: Merz, J. and M. Ehling (eds.), Time
Use – Research, Data and Policy, Publications of the Research Institute on Professions (FFB) of
the University of Lüneburg, , Vol. 10, Baden-Baden, 123-49.
Harvey, A. Fisher, K. , Gershuny, J. and A. Akbari (2000), Examining Working Time Arrangements
Using Time Use Surveys, ISER working paper No. 20, Essex.
Holst, E. and J. Schupp, J. (1994), Ist Teilzeitarbeit der richtige Weg? Arbeitszeitpräferenzen in Westund
Ostdeutschland, DIW-Wochenbericht, 35/94, 618-26, 1994.
Jenkins, S.P. and N.C. O’Leary (1996), Household Income plus household production: the distribution of
extended income in the UK, in: The Review of Income and Wealth, 42/4, 401-419
Killingsworth, M.R. (1983), Labour supply, Cambridge.
Killingsworth, M.R. and J.J. Heckman (1986), Female Labour Supply: A Survey, in: Ashenfelter, O. and
R. Layard (eds.) (1986), Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol I, Amsterdam/New York, 103-
204.
Lee, C. (2001), Changes in employment and hours, and family income inequality in the United States,
1969-1989, in: International Economic Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, 27-50
Lee, L. -F.(1983), Generalized econometric models with selectivity, Econometrica, 51(2): 507-512.
Lüthi, A. (1981), Messung wirtschaftlicher Ungleichheit, Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathematical
Systems No. 189, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, Springer Verlag.
Maasoumi, E. (1999), Empirical Analyses of Inequality and Welfare, in: Pesaram, M.H. und P. Schmidt
(Hg.), Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Vol. II, Microeconomics, Oxford: Plackwell
Publisher, 202-245.
Madalla, G.S. (1983), Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics,
Cambridge/London.
McFadden, D. (1976), Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement
McFadden, D.L. (1985), Econometric Analysis of Qualitative Response Models, in: Griliches, Z. and
M.D. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Volume II, Amsterdam/New York, 1395-
457.
Merz, J. (1990), Female Labour Supply: Labour Force Participation, Market Wage Rate and Working
Hours of Married and Unmarried Women in the Federal Republic of Ge rmany - The Influence of
Occupational Career, Transfers and Socio-Economic Variables Based on the Socio-Economic
Panel, in: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 240-70
Merz, J. (1990), The 1990 German Tax Reform - Microsimulation of Time Allocation Effects in the
Formal and Informal Economy, in: Brunner, J. G. and H.-G. Petersen (Eds.), Prospects and
Limits of Simulation Models in Tax and Transfer Policy, Frankfurt/New York, 509-37.
Merz, J. (2002a), Time Use Research and Time Use Data – Actual Topics and New Frontiers, in: Ehling,
M. and J. Merz (Eds.), Neue Technologien in der Umfrageforschung – Anwendungen bei der
Erhebung von Zeitverwendung, Schriften des Forschungsinstituts Freie Berufe (FFB) der
Universität Lüneburg, Baden-Baden, 3-19.
Merz, J. (2002b), Time and Economic Well-Being – A Panelanalysis of Desired vs. Actual Working
Hours, in: The Review of Income and Wealth, 48/3, 317-346
Merz, J. and D. Burgert (2003a), Working Hour Arrangements and Working Hours – A
Microeconometric Analysis Based on German Time Diary Data, FFB-Discussion Paper No. 41,
Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg and IZA
Discussion Paper No. 922, Bonn
Merz, J. and D. Burgert (2003b), Who is Working When? Tendencies in Working-Time -Pattern in
Germany – A Microeconometric Analysis, Proceedings of the 25th International Association for
Time Use Research (IATUR) Conference on Time Use Research, Comparing Time, Brussels,
September 17-19, 2003
Merz, J. and D. Kirsten (1999),Extended Income Dynamics: Valueing Household Production and its
Distributional Impacts – A Ten Years Panelanalysis for Professions, Entrepreneurs and
Employees, , in: Merz, J. and M. Ehling (Eds.), Time Use – Research, Data and Policy, FFBSchriftenreihe
Band 10, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, 351-382
Merz, J. and M. Ehling (1999), Time Use – Research, Data and Policy, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,
Baden-Baden.
Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling, Experience and Earnings, National Bureau of Economic Research:
Columbia University Press.
National Research Council (2000), Time-use measurement and research, Committee on National
Statistics (M. Ver Ploeg, J. Altonij, N. Bradburn, J. DaVanzo, W. Nordhaus and F. Samaniego
(eds.), Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academic Press,
Washigton, D.C.
Osberg, L. (2002), Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective, Discussion Paper,
Department of Economics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Pencavel, J. (1986), Labour Supply of Men: A Survey, in: Ashenfelter, O. and R. Layard (eds.) (1986),
Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol I, Amsterdam/New York, 3-102.
Polachek, S.W. and W. S. Siebert (1999), The Economics of Earnings, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge
Schupp, J. (1994), Teilzeitbeschäftigung im sozialen Wandel – Längsschnittanalysen und
handlungstheoretische Fundierung (Dissertation), Bochum, Ruhr-Universität.
Sen, A. (1992), Inequaliy Rexamined, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Shorrocks, A.F., 1980, The class of additively decomposable inequality measures, in: Econometrica, Vol.
48, No. 3, 613-625
Shorrocks, A.F., 1984, Inequality decomposition by population subgroups, in: Econometrica, Vol. 52, No.
6, 1369-1385
Silber, J. (1999), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Boston/London
Stata (8.2), StataCorp, College Station, Texas (http://www.stata.com)
Townsend, B. (2001), Dual –Earner Couples and Long Work Hours: A Structural and Life Course
Perspective,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology.
van Soest, A., Woittiez, I. and A. Kapteyn (1989), Labour Supply, Income Taxes and Hours Restrictions
in the Netherlands, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Dis cussion Paper No.
8903, Tilburg.

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.

Repository Staff Only: edit this item

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.