An Explanation of Economic Change and Development

Fusari, Angelo (2014): An Explanation of Economic Change and Development.

Abstract

The contribution to the explanation of economic change that this paper sets out is centered on a core of interconnected endogenous variables, mainly innovation, radical uncertainty and entrepreneurship, which current economic analyses consider only in part and separately, sometimes as endogenous but for the most as exogenous. The article (and the formalized model) suppose that the functioning of the economy is not disturbed by the operation of pathological factors mainly concerning public sector, as largely happens in current time, for instance: excessive public debt and public deficit; great inefficiencies and wastes in public sector and administration, and hence high taxation; inefficiencies, slowness and arbitrariness of judicial power; diffused organized criminality; financial capital operating, mainly at the international level, as master instead of servant of production, that is, largely devoted to speculation. A proper and efficient operation of the economy needs that those anomalies are absent. We attempt to explain economic change and development with regard to modern dynamic economies where the above pathologies have been removed. This supposition would be strengthened by the reduction of the model to only ‘necessary’ variables, as devised in sub-section 3.1.2 The theoretical frame of the proposed explanation is a dynamic competitive process: that is, a competition based not merely on prices but also put into action by entrepreneurs’ search for opportunities of profit attached to successful innovations, which generate profits through temporary monopolies and also engender disequilibria and radical uncertainty that will provide additional opportunities of profit. This dynamic competitive process is a great agent of economic change and evolutionary motion. As a first stage approximation, it can be thought of as a combination of Schumpeterian innovative entrepreneurship and action with the neo-Austrian market process and entrepreneurship: a combination describing the advent of innovations and the subsequent adaptive push enacted by the imitative diffusion of innovations and the search for other opportunities of profit allowed by rising disequilibria and uncertainty; a push that leads towards the reduction of the inconsistencies and radical uncertainty caused by innovation and (hence) towards a reorganization and re-equilibration of the economy on new structural bases. The understanding of the process of change and development is greatly obscured by the current separation of the two theoretical perspectives above. But it must be added that the explanation of such processes requires more than the simple combination of the two perspectives. In particular, it is essential that the notion of radical uncertainty – of which the Schumpeterian theory of economic development gives no explicit importance – is deepened. For its part, the neo-Austrian analysis of the market process, while attributing a great importance to radical uncertainty, thinks of it simply as a fog, an exogenous variable. We shall see that the explanation and measurement of radical uncertainty is a crucial – albeit very controversial and delicate – element of the understanding of the process of economic change and development. Moreover, we shall underline that the two theoretical perspectives (Schumpeterian and neo-Austrian) lack an adequate explanatory analysis of both the main agent of the whole process, that is, entrepreneurship (mainly its availability) and innovations. 1 It must be underlined that the notion of profit relevant with regard to the envisaged dynamic competition process does not include interest on the employed capital; it concerns only true profits, the so-called extra-profits resulting from entrepreneurial gains from successful innovations and the profit opportunities attached to the consequent disequilibria and uncertain perspectives. The ratio between those profits and the capital employed, expressed as the profit rate, is relevant mainly in that it is the only reliable indicator of the degree of success of an entrepreneur’s decision making, primarily in introducing innovations and meeting disequilibria and uncertainty. However, here we are not interested in the distribution of profits, that is, whether profit takes on a capitalist nature or is yielded by public or self-managed firms, etc. Such distributive characteristics express simply a choice of civilization, which is incidental to the mere question of economic change and development. Our model is not limited to the explanation of the core variables (that is, various kinds of innovation, such as radical and incremental process innovations and innovations of product, the demand and supply of entrepreneurship, and radical uncertainty) crucial in the representation of the whole process of change and the inherent disequilibrating and re-equilibrating evolutionary motion. The specified model also includes (and explains) other important variables such as output, employment, investment, prices, and wages. It refers to the maximum level of sectoral disaggregation, a sector for each specific good, and describes long waves. A specification with a restricted number of sectors is used for simulations. The structure of the paper is as follows: Section 1 concerns the introduction, while a second section is dedicated to a literary presentation of the theoretical construction, concerned mainly with the main variables enacting dynamic competition (entrepreneurship, radical uncertainty, innovation, profit) and long waves. A third section presents the formal specification of the model. This section is divided into five blocks. Block 1 concerns the explanation of radical process innovations and the advent of new products (that occur as soon as their explanatory functions reach some specified trigger values) and incremental innovations, while some Gamma distributions describe the diffusion of the radical process innovations across the economy, that is, the adaptive process following the innovative breakthroughs. Block 2 includes the equations explaining uncertainty, the availability of entrepreneurship, its demand and hence the excess of entrepreneurial skills. Block 3, which includes the equations of prices, wages and profits, has a conventional content, with the exception of some explanations of mark up and the definition of the rate of true profit, which excludes interests on capital. Block 4 concerns consumption and, in particular, the diffusion of new goods. Block 5 concerns capital and investment. A fourth section presents three simulations of the model that suppose different degrees of intensity of dynamic competition. A final section exposes some reference to a previous micro-specification of the model at the level of the firm. 2.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Development and growth,technological change, Innovations and their diffusion, economic evolution
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes

References

Aghion, P. & Howitt P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction.. NBER Working Paper, n° 3223, January: 1-48

Andersen, E. S. 2001. Satiation in an evolutionary model of structural economic dynamics, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 11, n. 1, pp. 143-164

Anderson, P., Tushman, M. L. 1990. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, pp.604-633

Atkinson, A. B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) 2000. Handbook of Income Distribution, North-Holland,Amsterdam.

Clark, J., Freeman, C., Soete, L. 1981. Long-Waves and Technological Development in the 20th Century, Konjunktur, Krise, Gesellschaft, vol. 25, n. 2 pp. 132-169

Ekstedt H., Fusari A. 2010. Economic theory and social change. Problems and revisions,Routledge, London

Erixon, L. 2007. Even the bad times are good: a behavioural theory of transformation pressure,Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 31, n. 3, May, pp. 327-348

European Commission 2006. The Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys, European Economy, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs,

Falkinger, J., Zweimüller, J. 1997. The impact of income inequality on product diversity and economic growth, Metroeconomica, vol. 48, n. 3 , pp. 211–237

Fatás-Villafranca F., Jarne G., Sánchez-Chóliz J. 2012. Innovation, cycles and growth, Journal of Evolutionary Economics vol. 22, n. 2 April, pp. 207-233

Foellmi, R., Zweimüller, J. 2006. Income Distribution and Demand-Induced Innovations, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 73, pp. 941-960

Freeman, Ch. (editor) 1996. Long Wave Theory, E. Elgar, Cheltenham

Freeman, Ch., Louçã, F. 2001. As Time Goes By. From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Fusari, A. 2005. A model of the innovation-adaptation mechanism driving economic dynamics: a micro presentation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 15, n. 3, August, pp.297-333

Fusari, A. 2007. Uncertainty, entrepreneurship, innovation. Some almost neglected features of the economic process, Paper presented at the 2007 EAEPE Conference, Porto 1-3 November

Fusari, A. 2013. Radical uncertainty, dynamic competition and a modello f business cycle. The implications of a measure and an explanation of what is supposed non-measurable and nonexplainable.International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 8, n° 12 June

Fusari, A. and Reati, A. 2013. Endogenizing tschnical change: Uncertainty, profits,entrepreneurship. A long-term view of sectoral dynamics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics (SCED) 24, 76-100

Gandolfo, G. 1980, Economic dynamics: Mthods and models. North-Holland, Amsterdam

Gandolfo, G. Martinengo, G. Padoan, P. C. 1981, Qualitative analysis and econometric estimation of continuous time dynamic models, North-Holland, Amsterdam

Goldstein, J. 1986. Markup Variability and Flexibility: Theory and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Business vol. 59, n. 4, pp. 599-621

Gort, M., Klepper, S. 1982. Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations, Economic Journal,vol.92, n. 367, pp. 630-653

Grossman. G.M & Helpman, E. (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58: 43-61

Hanusch, H., Pyka, A. (Eds) 2007. Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, E. Elgar,Cheltenham 38

Hatipoglu O. 2008. An Empirical Analysis of the Relatioship Between Inequality and Innovation in a Schumpeterian Framework, MPRA Paper No 7856, 20 March

Hayek, F. A. 1945. The knowledge in society. American Economic Review, September

Howitt, P. 1997. Expectations and uncertainty in contemporary Keynesian models, in Harcourt, G. C., Riach, P. A. (Eds): A ‘Second edition’ of The General Theory, Routledge, London, vol. 1,pp. 238-260

ISTAT (Italian Statistical Office) 2007. Contabilità nazionale. Conti economici nazionali. Anni 1970-2005, Istat, Rome

Jarne, G., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., Fatás-Villafranca, F. 2005. “S-shaped” Economic Dynamics. The Logistic and Gompertz curves generalized, The Electronic Journal of Evolutionary Modeling and Economic Dynamics, n. 1048, http://www.e-jemed.org/1048/index.php

Keynes, J. M. 2007 [1936]. The general theory of mployment, interest and money, Palgrave MacMillan, London

Keynes, J. M. 1937. The general theory of employment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,February, pp. 209-223

Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. The university of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

Kirzner, I. M. 1985. Discovery and the capitalist process,. Chicago I/L Ondon, The University of Chicago Press

Kleinknecht, A. 1990. Are there Schumpeterian waves of innovations?, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 14, n. 1 pp. 81-92

Li, M., Xiao, F., Zhu, A. 2007. Long Waves, Institutional Changes, and Historical Trends: A Study of the Long-Term Movement of the Profit Rate in the Capitalist World-Economy, Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. XIII, n. 1, pp. 33-54

Louçã F., Reijnders J. (Editors) 1999 The Foundations of Long Wave Theory. Models and Methodology, E. Elgar, Cheltenham

Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-42

Lunghini, G. 1996, L’età dello spreco. Disoccupazione e bisogni sociali, Bollati Boringhieri

Mensch, G.O. 1979. Stalemate in Technology. Innovations Overcome the Depression, Ballinger,Cambridge (Mass.)

Mensch, G. O. 1981. Long-Waves and Technological Development in the 20th Century: Comment,Konjunktur, Krise, Gesellschaft, vol. 25, n. 2 pp. 170-179

Oliveira Martins J., Scarpetta, S. 2002. Estimation of the cyclical behaviour of mark-ups: a technical note, OECD Economic Studies vol. 34, pp. 173-188

Nelson, R. R. 2008, Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory,Oxford Development Studies, vol 36 (1) pp. 9-21

Nelson, R R. and Winter S. G. 1983, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge,MA/London: Belknap, Harvard University Press

Pasinetti, L. L. 1981. Structural change and economic growth. A theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pasinetti, L. L 1987, Growth theory and its future, 7th Latin Americam Meeting of the Econometric Society

Perez, C. 2010. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34; n. 1, January, pp. 185-202

Perroux, F. 1964. L’économie du XXème siecle, PUF, Paris,

Piketty, T., Saez, E. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CXVII, Issue 1, February, pp. 1-39

Reati, A. 1990. Taux de profit et accumulation de capital dans l'onde longue de l'après guerre. Le cas de l'industrie au Royaume-Uni, en France, en Italie et en Allemagne, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 39

Reati, A. 1998 a. A Long-Wave Pattern for Output and Employment in Pasinetti’s Model of Structural Change, Economie Appliquée, tome LI, n. 2, pp. 27-75

Reati, A. 1998 b. Technological revolutions in Pasinetti’s model of structural change: productivity and prices, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 9, n. 2, pp. 245-262

Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Juornal of Political Economy 98(5): 71-102

Saviotti, P. 2001. Variety, growth and demand, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 11, n. 1,pp. 119-142

Saviotti, P., Pyka, A. 2004 a. Economic development by the creation of new sectors, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 14, n. 1, February, pp. 1-35

Saviotti, P., Pyka, A. 2008. Micro and macro dynamics: Industry life cycles, inter-sector coordination and aggregate growth, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 18, n. 2, April,pp. 167-182

Schumpeter, J. A. 1934 The theory of economic development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press

Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles. A Capitalist Process, McGraw-Hill, New York

Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin

Shell, K. (1967). A model of inventive activity and capital accumulation. Essays on the theory of optimal economic growth. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

Silverberg, G. 2007. Long waves: conceptual, empirical and modelling issues, in: Hanusch, H.,Pyka, A: Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics, E. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 800- 819

Solomou, S. 1987. Phases of economic growth, 1850-1973. Kondratieff waves and Kuznets swings,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Stefik, M., Stefik, B. 2006. Breakthrough: Stories and Strategies of Radical Innovation, MIT Press,Cambridge (Mass.)

Stoneman, P. 2007. Technological diffusion: aspects of self-propagation as a neo-Schumpeterian characteristic, in Hanusch and Pyka (eds), pp. 377-385

Van Duijn, J. J. 1983. The long wave in economic life, Allen and Unwin, London

Wymer C. R. 2006,Wysea System Estimation Analysis, package developed by Clifford R. Wymer([e-mail])

Yin, X., Zuscovitch, E. 2001. Interaction of Drastic and Incremental Innovations: Economic Development through Schumpeterian Waves, Economie Appliquée, tome LIII, n. 2; pp. 7-35

Zweimüller, J. 2000. Schumpeterian Entrepreneurs Meet Engel’s Law: The Impact of Inequality on Innovation-Driven Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, n. 5, June, pp. 185-206

Zweimüller J., Brunner, J. K. 2005.Innovation and growth with rich and poor consumers, Metroeconomica, vol. 56, n. 2, pp. 233-262 40