A Causality Test of the Revenue-Expenditure Nexus in Ghana

Obeng, Samuel (2015): A Causality Test of the Revenue-Expenditure Nexus in Ghana. Published in: ADRRI Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, Ghana , Vol. 11, No. Vol. 11, No. 11(1) (28 February 2015): pp. 1-19.

Abstract

Abstract The paper investigates the revenue-expenditure nexus for Ghana. The study covers the period 1980-2013. It examines whether increases in government revenue cause increases in government expenditure or increases in government expenditure cause increases in government revenue. It also examines if changes in government expenditure and revenue have feedback effects on each other. The stationarity test indicates that both variables are stationary at the levels when the test is done with a constant and a trend, and are first difference stationary when the test is done with a constant but no trend. The paper analyses the long-run relationship between government expenditure and government revenue using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method. The short-run relationships between the two variables are tested in a Vector Autoregressive (VAR) framework. The results show a very strong long-and short-run relationship between the variables. The second period lag of the revenue variable shows a negative relationship between government revenue and government expenditure. This indicates the possibility of the absence of Fiscal illusion in every two years of increased government expenditure. Granger causality test is done to determine the direction of the causal relationship between government expenditure and government revenue. The test gives a unidirectional causality running from revenue to expenditure. This implies government revenue causes government expenditure. Therefore, evidence of Tax-spend hypothesis is found. The implication is that, government must improve its revenue generation efforts in order for it to fund its ever increasing expenditure and to control the frequent fiscal slippages.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: government revenue, government expenditure, OLS, VAR, Granger-causality
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H0 - General; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H59 - Other; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H60 - General; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H62 - Deficit ; Surplus; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H68 - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt

References

AbuAI-Foul B., and Baghestani H (2004). The Causal Relation between Government Revenue and Spending: Evidence from Egypt and Jordan. Journal of Economics and Finance, 28, 260-269.

Adam S.C. and Bevan D. (2005). Fiscal Deficit and Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89, pp. 571-597.

Afonso A., and Rault C. (2009). Bootstrap Panel Granger-Causality between Government Spending and Revenue in the EU. Economics Bulletin, 29 (4), pp. 2542-2548

Al-Khulaifi A.S. (2012). The Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Qatar: A Cointegration and Causality Investigation. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol.4, No. 9.

Al-Zeaud A. H. (2012). Government Revenues and Expenditure: Causality Tests for Jordan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 4, No. 7.

Amoah B. and Loloh F.W. (2008). Causal Linkages between Government Revenue and Government Spending: Evidence from Ghana. Bank of Ghana, Working Paper, WP/BOG-2008/08.

Aregbeyen O. and Insah B. (2013). A Dynamic Analysis of the Link between Public Expenditure and Public Revenue in Nigeria and Ghana. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Vol.4, No.4.

Baghestani H and McNown R. (1994). Do Revenues Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal, 61, 311-322.

Barro R. (1979). On the Determination of Public Debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 940-971.

Barua S. (2005). An Examination of the Revenue Expenditure Causality in Bangladesh: 1974-2004. Bangladesh Bank of Policy Analysis Unit Working Paper Series WP 0605.

Buchanan J.M and Wagner R.W. (1978). Dialogues Concerning Fiscal Religion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 4, 627-636.

Carniero F.G., Faria J.R., and Barry B.S. (2004). Government Revenue and Expenditures in Guinea-Bissau: Causality and Cointegration. World Bank Group Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 65.

Cashin P., Haque N., Olekalns N. (1999). Spend Now, Pay Later? Tax Smoothening and Fiscal Sustainability in South Asia. IMF Working Paper WP/99/63.

Chang T. (2009). Revisiting the Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries based on the Panel Data Approach. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 165-172.

Chang T., and Ho Y.H. (2002). A Note on Testing Tax-and-Spend, Spend-and-Tax, of Fiscal Synchronization: The Case of China. Journal of Economic Development, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 151-160.

Dogan E. (2013). Does “Revenue-led Spending” or “Spending-led Revenue” Hypothesis Exist in Turkey? British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, Vol. 8 (2).

Doh-Nani R. and Awunyo-Vitor D. (2012). The Causal Link between Government Expenditure and Government Revenue in Ghana. Asian Economic and Financial Review, Vol 2, No. 2, pp. 382-388.

Eita J.H. and Mbazima D. (2008). The Causal Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditue in Namibia. Munich Personal Repec Archive (MPRA) Paper No. 9154.

Elyasi Y. and Rahimi M. (2012). The Causality between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure in Iran. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 5 (1): 129-145.

Fasano U and Wang Q. (2002). Testing the Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from GCC Countries. IMF Working Paper WP/02/201.

Friedman M. (1978). The Limitations of Tax Limitation. Policy Review, Vol. 5, No. 78, pp. 7-14.

Hamdi H. and Sbia R. (2013). Re-Examining Government Revenue, Government Spending and Economic Growth in GCC Countries. The Journal of Applied Business Research, Volume 29, Number 3.

Heller P.S. (1975). A Model of Public Fiscal Behaviour in Developing Countries: Aid, Investment and Taxation. The American Economic Review, 65, 429-45. International Monetary Fund (2014). International Financial Statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

ISSER (2013). Policies and Options for Ghana’s Economic Development. Legon: Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana.

Li X. (2001). Government Revenue, Government Expenditure and Temporal Causality: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 33, 4, pp. 485-497.

Magazzino C. (2012). Revenue and Expenditure Nexus: A Case Study of ECOWAS. Economics-EJournal, Discussion Paper, No 2012-57. Also in Economics-EJournal, Discussion Paper, No 2013-13.

McGilliviary M. and Morrisey O. (2000). Aid Fungibility in Assessing Aid: Red Herring or True Concern? Journal of International Development, 12, 413-28.

Meltzer A.H, and Richard S.F. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914-927.

Moalusi D. (2004). Causal Link between Government Spending and Revenue: A Case Study of Botwsana. Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series, Number, dp2007-07.

Musgrave R (1966). Principles of Budget Determination. In H. Cameran and W. Henderson (Eds.), Public Finance: Selected readings (pp 15-27). New York: Random House.

Nanthakumar L., Kogid M., Sukemi M.N., and Muhamad S. (2011). Tax Revenue and Fiscal Constraints: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. China-USA Business Review. Vol. 10, No. 9, 779-784.

Narayan P.K. (2005). The Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Nine Asian Countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 1203-1216.

Narayan P.K. and Narayan S. (2006). Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Developing Countries. Applied Economics, 38, 285-291.

Ndoricimpa A. (2013). Analysis of Asymmetries in the Tax-Spending Nexus in Burundi: Evidence from Threshold Modelling, TAR, and M-TAR Models. Work-In-Progress, Submitted to the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC).

Nyamongo M., Esman M., and Schoeman N. J. (2007). Government Revenue and Expenditure Nexus in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 10, 2, pp. 256-268.

Obioma E. and Ozughalu U.M. (2010). An Examination of the Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Nigeria: Cointegration and Causality Approach. Central Bank of Nigeria, Economic and Financial Review, Volume 48/2.

Osei R., Morrisey O., and Lloyd T. (2005). The Fiscal Effects of Aid in Ghana. Journal of International Development, 17: 1037-1053.

Peacock A. and Wiseman J. (1961). The Growth of Public Expenditures in the United Kingdom, Princeton NJ: Princeton UP.

Peacock A. and Wiseman J. (1979). Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth. Public Finance Quarterly, 7, 3-23.

Remmer K.L. (2004). Does Foreign Aid Promote the Expansion of Government? American Journal of Political Science, 48, 77-92.

Richter C. and Dimitrios P. (2013). Tax and Spend, Spend and Tax, Fiscal Synchronization or Institutional Separation? Examining the Case of Greece. Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy, Volume 4, Issue 2(7), July-December 2013, pp. 1-17.

Sakyi D. (2013). On the Implications of Trade Openness, Foreign Aid and Democracy for Wagner’s Law in Developing Countries: Panel Data Evidence for West African Monetary Zone (WAMZ). The Journal of Developing Areas, Volume 47, Number 2, Fall 2013.

Vamvoukas G. A. (2011). The Tax-Spend Debate with an Application to the EU. Economic Issues, Vol. 16, Part 1. Wolde-Rufael Y. (2008). The Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: The Experience of 13 African Countries. African Development Review, 20, 273-283.

Young A.T. (2009). Tax-Spend or Fiscal Illusion? Cato Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Fall 2009).