Croissance schumpétérienne et taxe sur la pollution

Wabenga Yango, James and Nlemfu Mukoko, Jean Blaise (2012): Croissance schumpétérienne et taxe sur la pollution.

Abstract

This paper is based on the work of Aghion and Howitt. We have integrated some elements including the tax on the dirty production, varieties production function and the isoelastic utility function. Furthermore, we analyze how the growth theory integrates the environmental dimension. We find that, the tax on the dirty production has no effect on the growth rate of consumption and the rate at which the flow of the natural resource has to deduce.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Schumpeterian Growth and pollution tax
• Language: French
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q30 - General

References

Acemoglu, D., 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills? directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly journal of economics, 1055-1089.

Acemoglu, D., 2000. Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Tech. rep., National bureau of economic research.

Acemoglu, D., 2002. Directed technical change. The Review of Economic Studies 69 (4), 781-809.

Acemoglu, D., 2008. Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press.

Acemoglu, D., Zilbotti, F., 1999. Productivity differences. Tech. rep., National bureau of economic research.

Agglieta, M., 1982. Regulation et crise du capitalisme. Paris, Calmann-Levy.

Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., Howitt, P., 2010. L'économie de la croissance. Economica.

Aghion, P., Cette, G., Cohen, E., Pisani-Ferry, J., 2007. Les leviers de la croissance française. la Documentation française.

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1990. A model of growth through creative destruction. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., Mazerolle, F., 2000. Théorie de la croissance endogène. Dunod.

Allemand, S., Les paradoxes du développement durable.

ALLEMAND, S., 2004. Les ressorts de la croissance. Sciences humaines (7), 29-29.

Artus, P., Cette, G., Garnier, O., Belorgey, N., 2004. Productivité et croissance. La Documentation Française.

Barro, R. J., 1988. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth.

Barro, R. J., 1988. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth.

CETTE, G., 2004. Productivité et croissance, quelles relations? Futuribles (299).

Charolles, V., 2008. Et si les chiffres ne disaient pas toute la vérité? Fayard.

Clerc, D., 2002. Aux racines de la croissance. Alternatives économiques, 12-15.

Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., Wheeler, D., 2002. Confronting the environmental kuznets curve. Journal of economic perspectives, 147-168.

Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 92-116.

Griliches, Z., 2007. R&D, patents and productivity. University of Chicago Press.