Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2008): EMERGING DIMENSIONS OF DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE IN THE AGE OF GLOCALIZATION. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_6734.pdf Download (267kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 21st Century the development landscape worldwide is constantly being shaped and reshaped by the simultaneous processes of globalization and localization (collectively called Glocalization). In this scenario the subnational political units are emerging as the principle actors in the global economy. With this the location or site of governance is changing. Thus the need is to situate the debate on decentralization in context of glocalization. This chapter is an attempt to understand ‘why’ and ‘how’ of decentralization─ the questions that have perplexed the policy makers and academicians in the age of glocalization. It has been argued that ‘how decentralization is designed’ depends on ‘why decentralization is being carried out’: Drive determines the design. The chapter reflects upon various dimensions related to the design of decentralization and shows that out of the competing approaches none forms an ‘ideal type solution’. Solution, it is agued, is to be found not in antipodes but in an ‘optimal mix of policies implemented with optimal pace’. Each country however must find its own ‘optimality’ given its tradition, geography, economy, income level, social structure and political choices.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | EMERGING DIMENSIONS OF DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE IN THE AGE OF GLOCALIZATION |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Decentralization, localization, globalization, glocalization |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General |
Item ID: | 6734 |
Depositing User: | Chanchal Kumar Sharma |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jan 2008 18:45 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 12:02 |
References: | Alesina and Spolaore.1997. On the Number and Size of Nations, Quarterly Journal of Economics. November, 112, 1027-56. Azfar Omar , Satu Kähkönen, Anthony Lanyi, Patrick Meagher, and Diana Rutherford .1999. ‘Decentralization, Governance and Public Services: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements; A Review of Literature’, IRIS Center, University of Maryland, College Park September p1-34. Bahl, Roy. 1999. “Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy.” Public Budgeting & Finance. Vol 19 (summer), pp 59-75. Blanchard, Olivier and Anderei Shleifer.2000. “Federalism with and Without Political Centralization: China Versus Russia,” NBER Working Paper 7616, Cambridge,Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. Block, Peter. 1993. Stewardship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Boex, Jamie. 2001. An introductory Overview of Intergovernmental Fiscal relations. Training material for workshop on fiscal decentralization in Nepal organized jointly by United nations Capital Development Fund, Local Bodies Finance commission (Nepal), Andrew Young School of Policy Studies and Georgia state university. Bolton, P., and G. Roland. 1997. “The break-up of nations : a political economy analysis”, The Quaterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1057-90. Breton, Albert. 1965. ‘A Theory of Government Grants’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 31, 2, 175-187. Brewer, John. 1976. Party Ideology and Popular Accession of George III Politics at the. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Burki Shahid Javed,Guillermo E. Perry, and William R. Dillinger. 1999. Beyond the Center: Decentralizing the State. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. Foord, Archibald. 1964. His Majesty’s Opposition, 1714-1830. Oxford: Clarendon. Garrett, G and Jonathan Rodden. 2003. “Globalization and Fiscal Decentralization” in Miles Kahler and David Lake, eds., Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton University Press., Pp. 87-109. Giddens, Anthony. 2000. Runaway World. New York: Routledge. Gunn, J.A.W. 1969. Politics and the Public Interest in the Seventeenth Century. London. Hirschman, Alberto.1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hiscox, Michael J. 2003. “ Political Integration and Disintegration In The Global Economy” in Miles Kahler and David Lake (eds) Globalizing Authority, Princeton University Press. Huntington, S.P.1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press. Kahler Miles and David A Lake. 2003. “Globalization and Governance : Definition, Variation and Explanation” in Miles Kahler and David Lake (eds) Globalizing Authority, Princeton University Press. Khondker, Habibul. 1994. ‘Globalization Theory: A Critical Analysis’ Department of Sociology Working Paper, National University of Singapore. North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oates, Wallace E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature September, 1120-1149. Ohmae, Kenichi. 1995. The End of the Nation State The Rise of Regional Economies New York : The Free Press. Olson, Mancur Jr. 1969. “The Principle of Fiscal Equivalence: The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government”, The American Economic Review, 59, 2, 479-87. Ostrom, Elinor, L. Schroeder, and S. Wynne. 1993. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development. Boulder: Westview Press. Parker, Andrew N. 1995. “Decentralization: The Way Forward for Rural Development?” Policy research Working Paper 1475. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Pranab K. Bardhan & Dilip Mookherjee, 2000. "Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels," American Economic Review, Vol. 90 (2) pp. 135-139. Prud’homme, Remy. 2001. “Decentralization Mechanisms” UNCDF Workshop on Decentralization and Local Governance in Africa, Cape Town, March 2001. Ritzer, G .2004. The Globalization of Nothing. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge. Robbins, Caroline. 1959/1968. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealth man. New York: Atheneum. Robertson, Roland. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage. Rodrik, D.1996. “Understanding Economic Policy reform,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol 34; 9-41. Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1762. The Social Contract¸ edited by Frederick Watkins, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986. Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1772. Considerations on the Government of Poland and on its Proposed Reformation, by Frederick Watkins, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986. Sato, Motohiro. 2002. "Intergovernmental Transfers, Governance Structure and Fiscal Decentralization" . Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 53, pp. 55-76. Schneider, Aaron. 2003. ‘Who gets what from whom? The impact of decentralization on tax capacity and pro-poor policy’. IDS Working Paper 179, Institute for Development Studies (IDS) February 2003. Shah, Anwar. 2004. “Fiscal Decentralization in Developing and Transition Economies; Progress, Problems and Promise” World Bank Policy Research working paper 3282, April. Sharma, Chanchal Kumar. 2005a. Why Decentralization? The Puzzle of Causation” SYNTHESIS, 3 (1) July-December. _______________________. 2005b. “The Federal Approach to Fiscal Decentralization: Conceptual Contours for Policy Makers.” Loyola Journal of Social Sciences. XIX (2): 169-188. _______________________. 2005c. “When Does Decentralization Deliver? The Dilemma of Design.” South Asian Journal of Socio-Political Studies. 6(1): 38-45. ¬_______________________. 2006. “ Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the Degree and Evaluating the Outcomes”, Indian Journal of Political Science. LXVII (1): 49-64. Spahn, P. Bernd. 1997. “Decentralization in Transition economis.” Paper prepared for the Worl bank Seminar on Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries, Washington, D.C., May 7. Synder,R.(1999) “After Neoliberalism : The Politics of reregulation in Mexico” World Politics, 52(2) : 173-204. Tocqueville, Alexis de (1952) Oeuvres complètes, ed. Jacob Peter Mayer, 2 vols. (Paris) Gallimard. United nations (DDSMS and UNDP) [1996] Report of the United nations Global Forum on Innovative Policies and Practices in Local Governance, Gothenburg, Sweden, 23-27 September. USAID (United States Agency for International Development Programme). 1990. Democratic Institution Support Project Report, Washington DC : USAID. Wei, Shang Jin, P. Lian (1998)“To Shock or Not to Shock: Economics and Political Economy of Large-scale Reforms,” Economics and Politics, 10(2): 161-183, July. Wildasin, David E. 1996. “Comments on ‘Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects,’ by Vito Tanzi” In M. Bruno and B. Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC: The World Bank), 323–328. World Bank. (1995). Better Urban Services: Finding the Right Incentives. A Development in Practice Book. Washington, D.C. World Bank (1999) World Development Report, 1999-2000: Entering the 21 st Century, WB, Washington DC USA. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/6734 |
Available Versions of this Item
- EMERGING DIMENSIONS OF DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE IN THE AGE OF GLOCALIZATION. (deposited 14 Jan 2008 18:45) [Currently Displayed]