Schmidt, Oliver (2008): How Microfinance Associations add value - 2 Observations with references from the Association of MFIs of Uganda (AMFIU). Published in: Microfinance Gateway No. Online (23. January 2008)
Download (72kB) | Preview
There are manifold reasons for microfinance association; the most common ones are advocacy, information, capacity building. However, the one unifying rationale of this organisational type appears to be wanting. The following paper makes two cases about the rationale of MF associations: 1. MF associations should NOT be regulatory bodies. In Uganda and elsewhere, there is a tendency to transform associations into apexes, to use them for regulation tasks. This is based on two motives: On the one hand, due to under-conceptualisation of associations, their promoters tend to see a promising opportunity in some regulatory role; its impact is often not well understood or neglected. On the other hand, some government agencies that lack resources and reliable systems for fulfilling regulatory tasks tend to see apexes as a convenient "quick fix." 2. The competitive edge of MF associations lies in improving informational efficiency of the Microfinance sector. MF associations are uniquely positioned to compile data for creation of information – e. g. performance monitoring – that are barred to any other organisation. MF associations should be built around that objective and judged by it. Many interventions oscillate around partial issues of informational efficiency, e. g. credit reference and rating services. Yet, its conceptualisation has been curiously neglected by development partners. Consequently appreciation has been insufficient regarding the specific, impressive management demands faced by MF associations. These are the conclusions of over 2 years working with AMFIU. AMFIU, the microfinance association of Uganda, has been commended as one of the leading MF associations of Africa. AMFIU grew its membership and expanded its operations impressively. In its 12th year of existence, AMFIU membership represents about three quarter of the Ugandan microfinance sector in terms of portfolio and client outreach.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||How Microfinance Associations add value - 2 Observations with references from the Association of MFIs of Uganda (AMFIU)|
|Keywords:||Microfinance, Development, Meso-Level Organisations, Associations, Information, Information Management|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
|Depositing User:||Oliver Schmidt|
|Date Deposited:||19. Jan 2008 14:48|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 19:49|
AMFIU (2005): Sound Practices in Microfinance – A Compilation of International and Ugandan Good Practices for Microfinance Stakeholders, Kampala. AMFIU (2006): On course for Transparency: 40 MFIs commit themselves, in: The Microfinance Banker, 2/2006, p. 24/25. AMFIU (2007): Manual Front Desk Processes (draft), Kampala (internal document). Baguma, David T. (2006): Self-regulation of Tier 4 Microfinance Institutions: AMFIU’s Perspective, AMFIU Working Paper No. 3, Kampala. Blatter, Robert / Mbabazi, Jacqueline / Kumwesiga, Carol T. (2006): The State of Microfinance in Uganda - Analysing AMFIU members, AMFIU Working Paper No. 5, Kampala. Blatter, Robert / Schmidt, Oliver (2007): Do associations impact on growth? – The case of the Association of Microfinance Institutions of Uganda (AMFIU), in: Africa Yearbook 2007, Bremen. De Boer, Hasse (2007): Evaluation of AMFIU – Final Report, funded by GoU/EU’s SUFFICE-programme, Kampala (unpublished). Goodwin-Gren, R. / Bruett, T. / Latortue, A. (2004): Uganda Microfinance Sector Effectiveness Review, CGAP, Wasshington D. C. Gross, Roland / Brüntrup, Michael (2003): Microfinance Associations (MFA) – Their Role in Developing the Microfinance Sector, GTZ – Division 41, Eschborn. Hinterhuber, H. H. / Levin, B. M. (1994): Strategic Networks – The Organisation of the Future, in: Long Range Planning, 27, 3, S. 43-53. Schmidt, Oliver (2005a): Ein Leuchtturm für die Wirtschaftswissenschaften, in: Wirtschaftsdienst, 85. Jahrgang, Februar 2005, S. 126ff. Schmidt, Oliver (2005b): Employing AMFIU's PMT: Experiences and expectations – Analysis of the results of the PMT-survey carried out in March 2005, AMFIU Working Paper No. 1,Kampala. Schmidt, Oliver (2006): Do Microfinance Development Strategies care about the consumer? – Assessing Microfinance trends and drivers upon the case of Uganda, in: Info-CD "Microfinance", ded Fachreferat P12, September 2006, Bonn. SEEP (2004): Global Directory of Regional and Country Level Microfinance Networks, Washington D. C. SEEP (2006): Network Capacity Assessment Tool (NCAT) - Assessing the Organizational Capacities of Microenterprise Development Networks, Version 4.0 (January 2006), Washington D. C. Staschen, Stefan (2006): Possible Mechanisms to Regulate Tier 4 MFIs in Uganda, with Michael Akumpiria, in: AMFIU (2006): Regulating and Strengthening Tier 4 Microfinance Institutions in Uganda: Background Studies, compiled by the Tier 4 Technical Working Subcommittee, Microfinance Forum, Kampala, p. 62-97.