Shah, Deepak (2008): Institutional Credit through Cooperatives in Maharashtra: A Region-wise Analysis.
Download (160kB) | Preview
In the era of financial sector reforms, sustainability, viability and operational efficiency of rural financial institutions (RFIs) are the major issues that need to be taken cognizance of in ensuring effective rural credit delivery system. However, the major problems plaguing the efficiency of rural credit delivery system are the mounting overdue and Non Performing Assets (NPAs) of RFIs. In the state of Maharashtra, the credit cooperatives have not only shown slower growth in their institutional finance coupled with much slower growth in their membership but also faster growth in outstanding loans as against their loan advances during the reform period. The reason for this dismal scenario can be associated with adverse environment created by the financial sector reforms, which have reduced the entire rural credit delivery through cooperatives to a moribund state. The financial sector reforms have accorded greater flexibility to cooperatives to invest in non-target avenues like shares and debentures of corporates, units of mutual funds, bonds of public sector undertakings, etc. This has affected credit flow from these major institutions operating in rural Maharashtra as most of their loans meant for farm finance are diverted to investments. The estimates of this study also show not only wide variation in total and crop loan advances of PACS but also their outstanding loans, overdue and per member borrowing across different regions of Maharashtra. The outstanding loan of PACS based on per hectare GCA is seen to have exceeded loan advances with a comfortable margin in all the regions of the state. Although increase in outstanding loan with rise in loan advances and GCA is another issue, the most important one among all is the mounting overdue and NPAs of cooperatives that sets a path where from there is no return and, which ultimately leads to inefficiency in cooperative credit delivery. In order to rejuvenate rural credit delivery system through cooperatives, the major problems facing the system, viz., high transaction cost, poor repayment performance, mounting NPAs, distributional aspect of credit, coverage of various social groups, etc., need to be tackled with more fiscal jurisprudence reserving exemplary punishment for willful defaults, particularly large farmers. In fact, insofar as the rural credit delivery system is concerned, the focus should be on strategies that are required for tackling issues such as sustainability and viability, operational efficiency, recovery performance, small farmer coverage and balanced sectoral development.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Institutional Credit through Cooperatives in Maharashtra: A Region-wise Analysis|
|Keywords:||Institutional Credit Cooperatives Region-wise Analysis|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages|
|Depositing User:||Deepak Shah|
|Date Deposited:||18. Feb 2008 14:40|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 08:31|
Gulati, Ashok and Seema Bathla (2002), ‘Institutional Credit to Indian Agriculture: Defaults and Policy Options’, Occasional Paper-23, NABARD, Mumbai.
Mujumdar, N.A. (2001), ‘The New Architecture of the Rural Credit System’, Professor M.L. Dantwala Monograph Series Monograph No. 1, Department of Economics, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, August.
Shah, Deepak (2003), ‘An Economic Evaluation of Agricultural Financial Institutions in Maharashtra’, Artha Vijnana, Vol. 45, Nos. 3 & 4, September-December, pp. 185-296.
Shah, Deepak (2006), ‘Resurrection of Rural Credit Delivery System in Maharashtra’, Background paper for the project ‘Suicide of Farmers in Maharashtra’, undertaken by the IGIDR, Mumbai. The report was submitted to the Government of Maharashtra (GOM). Paper is available at: http://www.igidr.ac.in/suicide/BackgroundPapers_SFM_IGIDR_26Jan06.pdf
Subrahmanyam, B (1999), ‘Cooperative Credit Structure: A Perspective for 2000 A.D.’, in Positioning Cooperatives in 21st Century, op. cit., pp. 182-190.
Puhazhendhi, V. and B.Jayaraman (1999), ‘Rural Credit Delivery: Performance and Challenges Before Banks’, EPW, January 16, pp. 175-182.