Beard, Rodney (2008): End-Point versus Point of Sale Levying of Plant Breeding Royalties: An Economic Analysis using Optimal Control Theory.
Download (156Kb) | Preview
Intellectual property rights for commercial crops have become in- creasingly controversial as plant breeders have sought to protect their investment through licensing and royalties, and farmers, in particular ecologically-oriented farmers, have promoted seed-saving as a conser- vation measure. Plant breeders have argued that seed saving reduces sales to breeders and that the imposition of royalties is necessary to maintain sales and to compensate them for the intellectual property invested in commercial varieties. These issues are explored here. In this paper, an optimal control model of seed purchase decisions in the presence of seed saving is developed. The model is used to analyze the impact of both point of sale royalties and end-point royalties on seed puchase decisions. The two approaches to levying royalties are then compared and policy conclusions drawn.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||End-Point versus Point of Sale Levying of Plant Breeding Royalties: An Economic Analysis using Optimal Control Theory|
|Keywords:||Agricultural economics, plant breeding, intellectual property, royalties|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
|Depositing User:||Rodney Beard|
|Date Deposited:||16. Feb 2008 07:38|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 21:39|
Agriculture and Agrifood Canada (2004) The Report of the Seed Sector Advisory Committee, May.  AWB, Ltd. (http://www.awb.com.au/growers/awbseeds/ endpointroyalties/ paymentofendpointroyalties/)  Commonwealth of Australia, Plant Breeders Rights Act (No. 110 of 1994 as amended in 2002) Consolidated text. PVP Gazette 95 April 2003  Government of Canada, The Plant Breeders' Rights Act PVP Gazette 62 Published: April 1991  Government of Canada Regulations Respecting Plant Breeders' Rights PVP Gazette 69 Published: November 1992.  Grain (2007) The end of farm-saved seed? Industry's wish list for the next revision of UPOV, Grain Brieng February. R.Kingwell and A.Watson (1998) End-point royalties for plant breeding in Australia, Agenda Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 323-334.  R.Lindner (2004) Economic Issues for Plant Breeding - Public Funding and Private Ownership, Australasian Agribusines Review Vol.12,No. 6.  R.Kingwell (2005) Institutional Change and Plant Variety Provision in Australia, Australasian Agribusines Review Vol.13,No. 5.  R.Kingwell (2001) Charging for the use of plant varieties The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45 (2), 291305.  United States Department of Agriculture Plant Variety Pro- tection Act and Regulations and Rules of Practice, Revised March 2001.  W. Lesser (1997) Assessing the implications of intellectual property rights on plant and animal agriculture, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(5), 1584-1591.  L.H. Woodhouse (1933) Changes in farm Organization and Practices, Journal of Farm Economics 15(1), pp. 103-110.