Rajesh Raj, Seethamma Natarajan (2007): Technical Efficiency in the Informal Manufacturing Enterprises: Firm level evidence from an Indian state.
Download (154kB) | Preview
The small and medium enterprise sector plays a pivotal role in the socio-economic development and growth of nations. But there is evidence that the firms in this sector are less efficient than those in the large enterprise sector. Hence it is imperative to examine their efficiency levels in order to identify the factors that contribute inefficiency in these firms and to generate information for designing support policies for them. In this study, level and sources of technical efficiency in the unorganised manufacturing sector in the Indian state of Kerala is examined using translog stochastic frontier production function. The analysis is conducted for five broad industry groups and the sector as a whole using firm level data. The findings show that high levels of technical inefficiency, which reduce their potential levels significantly, characterize the unorganised manufacturing enterprises in Kerala. Regarding the factors contributing to inefficiencies, it is observed that size, ownership, region (location) and nature of seasonality of operation significantly influence technical efficiency level in most of the industry groups. We also find that credit availability and employment of hired labour play an important role in explaining technical efficiency levels.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Technical Efficiency in the Informal Manufacturing Enterprises: Firm level evidence from an Indian state|
|Keywords:||Technical Efficiency; Stochastic Frontier Production Function; Unorganised Manufacturing Sector; Kerala|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
|Depositing User:||Rajesh Raj S N|
|Date Deposited:||19. Mar 2008 04:40|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 05:32|
Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C. A. K. and Schmidt, P. (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21-37.
Badunenko, O., Fritsch, M. and Stephan, A. (2006) What determines the technical efficiency of a firm? The importance of industry, location and size, Working Paper No. 33, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena, Jena, Germany.
Batra, G. and Tan, H. SME technical efficiency and its correlates: Cross-national evidence and policy implications, World Bank Institute, Washington, 2003.
Battese, G. E. and Coelli, T. J. (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data, Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332.
Battese, G. E. and Coelli, T. J. A stochastic frontier production function incorporating a model for technical inefficiency effects, Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics No. 69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, 1993.
Battese, G. E. and Corra, G. S. (1977) Estimation of a frontier production model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21, 169-179.
Bose, A. Population of India: 2001 census results and methodology, B.R. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, 2001.
Centre for Development Studies, Human Development Report 2005, State Planning Board, Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, 2006.
Coelli, T, J. A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: a computer program for stochastic frontier and cost function estimation, CEPA Working Paper 96/08, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, 1994.
Dasgupta, B. Contrasting urban patterns: West Bengal, Punjab and Kerala. pp. 219-256. In Kundu, A. (ed.) Inequality, Mobility and Urbanisation: China and India, Indian Council of Social Science Research and Manak Publications, New Delhi, 2000.
de Soto, H. The other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World, Harper Row, New York, 1989.
Green, W.H. The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. pp.68-119. In Fried, H., Lovell, K. and Schmidt, S.S. (eds.) The measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1003.
Hernandez-Trillo, F., Pagan, J.A. and Paxton, J (2005) Start-up capital, microenterprises and technical efficiency in Mexico, Review of Development Economics, 9, 434-447.
Hill, H. (2001) Small and medium enterprises in Indonesia: Old policy challenges for a new administration, Asian Survey, 41, 248-270.
Jalan, J. and Ravallion, M. (1999) Are the poor less well insured? Evidence on vulnerability to income risk in rural china, Journal of Comparative Economics, 26, 338-357.
Jeromi, P. D. 2003 What ails Kerala economy: a sectoral explanation, Economic and Political Weekly, 38, 1584-1600.
Joseph, M. (2003) Performance of Southern States: A Comparative Study, Economic and Political Weekly, 38, 3915-3930.
Joseph, M. (2003) Performance of the southern states: a comparative study, Economic and Political Weekly, 38, 3915-3930.
Kim, S. (2003) Identifying and estimating sources of technical inefficiency in Korean manufacturing industries, Contemporary Economic Policy, 21, 132-144.
Kumbhakar, S.C., Ghosh, S. and McGuckin, J. T. (1991) A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in United-States diary farms, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9, 279-286.
Leibenstein, H. (1966) Allocative efficiency versus X-efficiency, American Economic Review, 56, 392-415.
Liedholm, C. Small firm dynamics: Evidence from Africa and Latin America, World Bank Institute, Washington, 2001.
Little, I.M.D., Mazumdar, D. and Page, J.M. Small manufacturing enterprises: a comparative analysis of India and other economies, Oxford University Press, New York, 2007.
Loveman, G. and Sengenberger, W. (1991) The re-emergence of small-scale production: An international comparison, Small Business Economics, 3, 1-37.
Margono, H and Sharma, S. C. (2006) Efficiency and productivity analyses of Indonesian manufacturing industries, Journal of Asian Economics, Article in Press, 2006.
Mathew, P.M. The industrial stagnation of Kerala: Some alternative explanations. pp.281-302. In Prakash, B.A. (ed.) Kerala’s Economic Development: Issues and Problems, Sage Publications, New Delhi, 1999.
Meeusen, W. and van den Broeck (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error, International Economic Review, 18, 435-444.
Mukherjee, Dipa (2004) Productivity in the small manufacturing enterprises: determinants and policy issues, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 47, 913-927.
Nabi, I. (1989) Investment in segmented capital markets, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 453-462.
Nikaido, Y. (2004) Technical efficiency of small-scale industry: Application of stochastic production frontier model, Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 592-597.
Nugent, J.B. and Yhee, S. Small and medium enterprises in Korea: Achievements, constraints and policy issues, World Bank Institute, Washington, 2001.
Onder, A. O., Deliktas, E. and Langer, A. (2003) Efficiency in the Manufacturing Industry of Selected Provinces in Turkey: A stochastic frontier analysis, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 39, 98-112.
Page, J. M. (1984) Firm size and technical efficiency – applications of production frontiers to Indian survey data, Journal of Development Economics, 16, 129-152.
Papola, T.S. (1981) Urban informal sector in developing economy, Vikas Publications, New Delhi.
Pillai, M. P. and Shanta, N. Long term trends in the growth and structure of the net domestic product in Kerala, Working Paper No. 376, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, 2005.
Pitt, M. M. and Lee, L. F. (1981) The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry, Journal of Development Economics, 9, 43-64.
Raj, R.S.N. and Duraisamy, M. (2005) Structure, Employment and Productivity Growth: Evidence from the Unorganized Manufacturing Sector in India, 1984/5-1994/5, Journal of International Business and Entrepreneurship, 11, 41-62.
Reifschneider, D. and Stevenson, R. (1991) Systematic departure from the frontier: a framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency, International Economic Review, 32, 715-723.
Saygili, S. and Taymaz, E. (2001) Privatization, ownership and technical efficiency: a study of the Turkish cement industry, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74, 581-605.
Sen, A.K. Radical needs and moderate reforms. pp.1-32. In Dreze, J. and Sen, A.K. (eds.) Indian Development: Selected Regional Perspectives, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 1997.
Shanmugam, K.R. and Bhaduri, S.N. (2002) Size, age and firm growth in the Indian manufacturing sector, Applied Economic Letters, 9, 607-613.
Soderbom, M. and Teal, F. (2004) Size and efficiency in African manufacturing firms: Evidence from firm-level panel data, Journal of Development Economics, 73, 369-394.
State Planning Board (2002) Economic Review, Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram.
Subrahmanian, K.K. Regional industrial growth under economic liberalization, Manak Publications, New Delhi, 2003.
Tybout, J.R. (1983) Credit rationing and investment behavior in a developing country, Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 393-410 . Zheng, J., Liu, X. and Bigsten, A. (1998) Ownership structure and determinants of technical efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to Chinese enterprises (1986-1990), Journal of Comparative Economics, 26, 465-484.