Moniz, António (2005): Methods for Scenario-building: it’s importance for policy analysis. Published in: Proceedings of Workshop on “Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis" (September 2005): pp. 1-18.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (389kB) | Preview
A scenario is a policy analysis tool that describes a possible set of future conditions. The most useful scenarios (for corporations, for policy decision makers) are those that display the conditions of important variables over time. In this approach, the quantitative underpinning enriches the narrative evolution of conditions or evolution of the variables; narratives describe the important events and developments that shape the variables. In terms of innovative methods for policy analysis, the foresight and scenario building methods can be an interesting reference for social sciences. Some examples of these exercises will be present in this paper, either related to vision in science and technology developments, social and technological futures, or related to aggregated indicators on human development. Two cases (Japan and Germany) are held on behalf the ministries of science and education (respectively, MEXT and BMBF), and another with the support of United Nations.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Methods for Scenario-building: it’s importance for policy analysis|
|English Title:||Scenario-building methods as a tool for policy analysis|
|Keywords:||scenarios; policy analysis; foresight; forecasting methods; technological futures|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods; Simulation Methods
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs > C80 - General
|Depositing User:||António Moniz|
|Date Deposited:||04. Apr 2008 08:49|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 09:49|
Ascher, William; Overholt, William H.: Strategic Planning and Forecasting: Political Risk and Economic Opportunity, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 1983, 311 pp
Bell, Daniel (ed.). Toward the Year 2000. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1968.
Cuhls, Kerstin: “Futur – foresight for priority-setting in Germany”, Int. Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3/4, 2004, pp. 183 – 194.
Cuhls, Kerstin; Blind, Knut and Grupp, Hariolf: Innovations for our Future, Physica publishers, Heidelberg, 2001.
Eto, Hajime: “Obstacles to the acceptance of technology foresight for decision makers”, Int. Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3/4, 2004, pp. 232 – 242.
Glenn, Jerome C.: Introduction to the Futures Research Methodology Series, AC/UNU Millennium Project, Washington, 1994
Glenn, Jerome C. (ed.), Futures Research Methodology - Millenium Project, Washington, AC/UNU, 1999.
Glenn, Jerome C.; Gordon, Theodore J., 2002 The State of the Future, Washington, UNU, 2002.
Godet, Michel. A Handbook of Strategic Prospective, Paris: UNESCO, 1993.
Godet, Michel. Integration of Scenarios and Strategic Management: Using Relevant, Consistent, and Likely Scenarios. Futures, Vol. 22, No. 7, September 1990, pp. 730-739.
Godet, Michel: Prospective et Planification Stratégique, by Economica Press, Paris, 1985.
Gordon, Theodore Jay: “The Delphi Method” in Futures Research Methodology, AC/UNU Millenium Project, Washington, AC/UNU 1994.
Gordon, Theodore J. Methods Frontiers and Integration, Futures Research and Studies Methodology Series, produced by UNU Millennium Project Feasibility Study - Phase II and published by UNDP/African Futures, 1994.
Gordon, Theodore J.: 2002 State of the Future, AC/UNU Millenium Project, Washington, 2002.
Grimm, Heike; Gamse, Robert: “Entrepreneurship Policy and Regional Economic Growth: Exploring the correlation”, paper presented at the ESF Exploratory Workshop on Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis, Erfurt, 25-28 Sept. 2004.
Grunwald, Armin: “Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society”, Int. Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 2004, pp. 150 – 167.
Kuhlmann, Stefan: “Future governance of innovation policy in Europe – three scenarios”, Research Policy, 30, 2001, Elsevier, pp. 953 – 976.
Lizaso, Fernando; Reger, Guido: “Linking roadmapping and scenarios as an approach for strategic technology planning”, Int. Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, vol. 1, No. 1, 2004, pp. 68 – 86.
Loveridge, Denis: “Experts and foresight: review and experience”, Int. Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 2004, pp. 33 – 69.
Meadows, Donella, Meadows, Denis, et al.: The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.
Moniz, António B.; Godinho, M. Mira: “Cenários prospectivos para as pescas: resultados da aplicação do método Delphi” in Pescas e Pescadores: Futuros para o emprego e recursos, A.B. Moniz, M.M. Godinho and I. Kovács (orgs.): Oeiras, Celta Editora, 2000, pp. 25 – 38.
Moniz, António B.; Godinho, M. Mira: New Methodological Approaches for Change in Traditional Sectors: The case of the Portuguese fisheries socio-economic system, Économies et Sociétés (Série “Dynamique technologique et organisation”), nº 5, 5/2000, pp. 63 – 77.
Moniz, António B.; Kovács, I. (orgs.): Sociedade da Informação e Emprego, Lisbon, DGEFP-MTS, 2001.
Moniz, António B. (org.): Futuros do Emprego na Sociedade da Informação, Lisbon, DGEFP-MTS, 2002.
Moniz, António, Provisional results of the 1st round of Delphi WorTiS exercise, MPRA Paper 5936, University Library of Munich 2004.
Moniz, António B.: Discussion of scenario topics for the automotive industry to apply a Delphi method in Portugal, MPRA Paper 5933, University Library of Munich, 2004.
NISTEP: The Seventh Technology Foresight: Future Technology in Japan toward the Year 2030, Tokyo, 2001 Ragin, Charles C. The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, University of California Press 1987.
Ragin, Charles C. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University Chicago Press 2000.
Ragin, Charles C.: “innovative Causal Analysis and Policy Research”, paper presented at the ESF Exploratory Workshop on Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis, Erfurt, 25-28 Sept. 2004.
Schwartz, Peter. The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York: Doubleday, 1991.
Smits, Ruud; Kuhlmann: “The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy”, Int. Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 2004, pp. 4 – 32.
Spreitzer, Astrid; Yamasaki, Sakura: “Beyond Methodological Tenets – The worlds of QCA and SNA and their benefit to Policy Analysis”, paper presented at the ESF Exploratory Workshop on Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis, Erfurt, 25-28 Sept. 2004.
Von Reibnitz, Ute. Scenario Techniques. Germany: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
Available Versions of this Item
Methods for Scenario-building: it’s importance for policy analysis. (deposited 23. Mar 2008 04:12)
- Methods for Scenario-building: it’s importance for policy analysis. (deposited 04. Apr 2008 08:49) [Currently Displayed]