Environmental policy in dynamic models with pollution by consumers: The impact of exogenous shocks and dozy politicians

Barthel, Jens (2007): Environmental policy in dynamic models with pollution by consumers: The impact of exogenous shocks and dozy politicians. Unpublished.

Abstract

The paper discusses questions resulting from a study of the interaction of exogenous shocks and environmental policy. In a model with pollution as a side effect of consumption environmental policy is introduced in the form of a consumption tax with or without a subsidy on eco-friendly investments. In simulations we observe the dynamic behavior of models before and after sudden changes of exogenous variables. These shocks are jumps in productivity or a sudden depreciation of capital. Additionally we examine the effect of a simultaneous appearance of both types of shocks. Furthermore we investigate the consequences of a lagged reaction of the policy agents.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental Policy Instruments;Exogenous Shocks
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods and Programming > C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt (1998): Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA, USA) and London (UK).

Barro, Robert, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1995): Economic Growth, McGraw Hill, New York et al.

Barthel, Jens (2005): Environmental Policy in Dynamic Models: The Impact of the Elasticity of Substitution if Consumers Pollute, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Discussion Paper - Economics Series 198.

Bohm, Peter, and Clifford S. Russell (1985): Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments, In: Allan Kneese and James L. Sweeney (eds.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, North-Holland, 395-460.

Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij (1997): Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth, Journal of Public Economics, 63, 207-237.

Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Sjak A. Smulders (1995): Environmental Quality and Pollution-augmenting Technical Change in a Two-sector Endogenous Growth Model, Journal of Public Economics, 57, 369-391.

Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Sjak A. Smulders (1996): Transitional Impacts of Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model, International Economic Review, 37, 861-891.

Brunner, Martin, and Holger Strulik (2002): Solution of Perfect Foresight Saddlepoint Problems: A Simple Method and Applications, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26, 737-753.

Chiang, Alpha C. (1984): Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York et al.

Conrad, Klaus (1999): Computable General Equilibrium Models for Environmental Economics and Policy Analysis, in: Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing Comp., Cheltenham (UK).

Ferguson, Brian, and G. C. Lim (1998): Introduction to Dynamic Economic Models, Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York.

Forster, Bruce A. (1973): Optimal Capital Accumulation in a Polluted Environment, Southern Economic Journal, 39, 544-547.

Gradus, Raymond, and Sjak A. Smulders (1993): The Trade-off Between Environmental Care and Long-term Growth - Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models, Journal of Economics / Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 58, 25-51.

Huang, Chung-Huang, and Deqin Cai (1994): Constant Returns Endogenous Growth with Pollution Control, Environmental and Resource Economics, 4, 383-400.

Ligthart, Jenny E., and Frederick van der Ploeg (1994): Pollution, the Cost of Public Funds and Endogenous Growth, Economics Letters, 46, 351-361.

Smulders, Sjak A., and Raymond Gradus (1996): Pollution Abatement and Long-term Growth, European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 505-532.