Mishra, SK (2008): Possibilities of quality enhancement in higher education by intensive use of information technology.
Download (282Kb) | Preview
Quality of higher education is a multi-dimensional concept. It lies in effectiveness of transmitting knowledge and skill; the authenticity, content, coverage and depth of information; availability of reading/teaching materials; help in removing obstacles to learning; applicability of knowledge in solving the real life problems; fruitfulness of knowledge in personal and social domains; convergence of content and variety of knowledge over space (countries and regions) and different sections of the people; cost-effectiveness and administrative efficiency. Information technology has progressed very fast in the last three decades; it has produced equipments at affordable cost and it has now made their wider application feasible. This technology has made search, gathering, dissemination, storing, retrieval, transmission and reception of knowledge easier, cheaper and faster. Side by side, a vast virtual library vying with the library in prints has emerged and continues growing rapidly. One may hold that the e-libraries are the libraries of tomorrow when the libraries in prints will be the antiques or the archival objects of the past.
This paper discusses in details how information technology can be applied to enhance the quality of higher education at affordable cost. It also discusses the major obstacles to optimal utilization of information technology and measures to remove them.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Possibilities of quality enhancement in higher education by intensive use of information technology|
|Keywords:||Information Technology; Quality in Higher Education; e-library; e-book; e-journal|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economics Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate
A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economics Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I23 - Higher Education Research Institutions
|Depositing User:||Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra|
|Date Deposited:||11. May 2008 05:19|
|Last Modified:||01. Mar 2013 05:26|
• Dey, A (2000), “Who Actually Paid for My Education?” (originally published in soc. culture. Indian in 2000) Available at http://www.deeshaa.org/who-actually-paid-for-my-education • Ebner, M, Kickmeier-Rust, M and Holzinger, A (2008), “Utilizing Wiki-Systems in Higher Education Classes: A Chance for Universal Access?”, Universal Access in the Information Society, http://www.springerlink.com/content/01898k53u2041651 • Frey, BS (2002) “Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing Between One‘s Own Ideas and Academic Failure” Working Paper No. 117, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich; Working Paper Series (ISSN 1424-0459); June 2002 [Published in: Public Choice Vol. 116, 2003, pp. 205-223]. Available at http://www.iew.unizh.ch/wp/iewwp117.pdf • Gans, JS and George, B (1994), “How are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1), pp. 165 - 180.
• Govt. of India (2008) National Knowledge Commission: Report to the Nation 2007. Available at http://knowledgecommission.gov.in/reports/report07.asp
• Hamermesh, DS (1994), “Facts and Myths about Refereeing”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1), pp. 153 - 164.
• Henaff, N (2006), “Higher Education: The Quality of Education and Its Evaluation.” Available at http://www.vn.refer.org/confrasie/conf7/docs/nolwen_henaff_en.pdf
• Johnson, RK and Luther, J (2007), The E-only Tipping Point for Journals: What’s Ahead in the Print-to-Electronic Transition Zone, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/Electronic_Transition.pdf
• Laband, N (1985), “Publishing Favoritism: A Critique of Department Rankings Based on Quantitative Publishing Performance”. Southern Economic Journal, 52, pp. 510 - 515.
• Laband, DN and Piette, MJ (1994), “Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors. Journal of PoliticalEconomy, 102 (1), pp. 194 - 203.
• Savenije, B (2000), “ The future of the library : The crucial importance of accessibility.” Available at http://www.library.uu.nl/staff/savenije/publicaties/florence.htm
• UNESCO (1998), World Conference on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action, Commission II: Quality of Higher Education, Final Report, Available at http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/file_download.php/8e7bc55cc8d95504234f5f4c0d11cc94CommissionII-E.pdf
• UNESCO (2004), EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005, Education For All: The Quality Imperative, UNESCO, Paris. • Vandermeulen, A (1972), “Manuscripts in the Maelstrom: A Theory of the Editorial Process”. Public Choice, 13, pp. 107 - 111.
• World Archaeological Congress (2006) eNewsletter (referred by Wikipedia) available at http://www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org/site/newsletters_11.php