Competing Industrial Standards and the Impact of Trade Liberalization

Kikuchi, Toru and Iwasa, Kazumichi (2008): Competing Industrial Standards and the Impact of Trade Liberalization. Unpublished.

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to illustrate, with simple trade theory, the relationship between competing industrial standards and trade liberalization. We assume that there are two competing industrial standards in an international context, each of which consists of differentiated products. A product can be used only in combination with other products based on the same industrial standard. We examine the impact of trade liberalization (i.e., a decline in trade costs) on consumers' choice of a standard. It will be shown that the degree of indirect network effects, captured with substitution between differentiated products, plays an important role as a determinant of the impact of trade liberalization.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies

References

[1] Chou, C., and O. Shy (1990)`Network Effects without Network Externalities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 8, pp. 259–270.

[2] Chou, C., and O. Shy (1996) “Do Consumers Gain or Lose when More People Buy the Same Brand,”European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 12, pp. 309–320.

[3] Church, N., and N. Gandal (1992) “Network Effects, Software Provision and Standardization,” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 85–104.

[4] Dixit, A. K., and J. Stiglitz (1977) “Monopolistic Competition and Op- timum Product Diversity,” American Economic Review, Vol. 67, pp. 297–308.

[5] Farrell, J., and P. Klemperer (2007) “Coordination and Lock-In: Com- petition with Switching Costs and Network Effects,”in Armstrang, M., and R.-H. Porter (eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1967–2072.

[6] Funk, J. (1998) “Competing between Regional Standards and the Suc- cess and Failure of Firms in the World-wide Mobile Communication Markets,”Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 22, pp. 419–441.

[7] Gandal, N. (2001) “Quantifying the Trade Impact of Compatibility Standards and Barriers: An Industrial Organization Perspective,” in Maskus, K. E., and J. S. Wilson (eds.) Quantifying the Impact of Tech- nical Barriers to Trade: Can It Be Done? University of Michigan Press, pp. 137–153.

[8] Gandal, N. (2002) “Compatibility, Standardization, and Network Ef- fects: Some Policy Implications,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 18, pp. 80–91.

[9] Gandal, N., and O. Shy (2001) “Standardization Policy and Interna- tional Trade,”Journal of International Economics, Vol. 53, pp. 363–383.

[10] Iwasa, K., and T. Kikuchi (2008) `Software Provision and the Impact of Market Integration: A Note,' Working Paper 0729, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.

[11] Kikuchi, T. (2005) `Interconnected Communications Networks and Home Market Effects,' Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 38, pp. 870–88

[12] Kikuchi, T. (2007)`Network Externalities and Comparative Advantage,' Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 59, pp. 327–337.

[13] Lembke, J. (2002) “Global Competition and Strategies in the Infor- mation and Communications Technology Industry: A Liberal-Strategic Approach,”Business and Politics, Vol. 4, Article 2.

[14] Matsuyama, K. (1992) “Making Monopolistic Competition More Use- ful,”Working Paper in Economics, E-92-18, Hoover Institution, Stan- ford University.