Marcus, J. Scott and Elixmann, Dieter (2008): Regulatory Approaches to NGNs: An International Comparison. Published in: Communications&Strategies No. 69 (March 2008): pp. 19-40.
Download (587Kb) | Preview
The emergence of Next Generation Networks (NGNs) raises profound challenges for regulators everywhere. Different regulatory authorities have approached these problems in strikingly different ways, depending in part on the overall regulatory milieu in which they operate, and in part on the nature of the NGN migration envisioned by major market players. Also, the NGN core network raises significantly different issues from those of the NGN access network. The migration to NGN raises many of the same issues that were already on the table as a result of the broader migration to IP-based services, notably in regard to the de-coupling of the service from the underlying network. To these concerns are added profound questions related to the nature of market power. Will NGNs enable new forms of competition? Will competitive bottlenecks remain, especially in the last mile? Will NGN enable new forms of bottlenecks to emerge, especially in the upper layers of the network, perhaps as a result of new IMS capabilities? Regulators in the UK, Netherlands, Germany, Japan and the United States have been forced to deal with these issues due to relatively rapid migration to NGNs proposed by their respective incumbent telecoms operators. Many of the same issues are also visible in the recommendations that the European Commission finalised on 13 November 2007 as part of the ongoing review of the European regulatory framework for electronic communications. In this paper, we compare and contrast the many regulatory proceedings that have been produced by these regulatory authorities.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Regulatory Approaches to NGNs: An International Comparison|
|Keywords:||Regulation; Next Generation Networks; access network; core network; all-IP; competition; market power; international comparison|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General
L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L50 - General
|Depositing User:||Sophie Nigon|
|Date Deposited:||22. May 2008 09:33|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 18:47|
ELIXMANN Dieter, J. Scott MARCUS & C. WERNICK (2008): The regulation of VoIP in Europe, a forthcoming report for the European Commission.
FCC (2005): In the Matters of Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to the Internet over Wireline Facilities, document FCC 05-150, released September 23, especially paragraph 75.
HAYEK F.A. (1945): The Reader's Digest condensed version of The Road to Serfdom, reprinted by the The Institute of Economic Affairs. The original appeared in Reader's Digest in 1945. Available online.
MARCUS J. Scott (2005): "Is the U.S. Dancing to a Different Drummer?", COMMUNICATIONS & STRATEGIES, no. 60, 4th quarter 2005. Available at: http://www.idate.fr/fic/revue_telech/132/CS60%20MARCUS.pdf Also available in Intermedia (the journal of the International Institute of Communications), vol. 34, no. 3, July/August 2006.
MARCUS J. Scott, Dieter ELIXMANN et. al. (2008): The Future of IP Interconnection: Technical, Economic, and Public Policy Aspects, a report for the European Commission, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/library/ext_studies/future_ip_intercon/ip_intercon_study_final.pdf.
MARCUS J. Scott & Justus HAUCAP (2005): "Why Regulate? Lessons from New Zealand", IEEE Communications Magazine, November, available at: http://www.comsoc.org/ci1/Public/2005/nov/ (click on "Regulatory and Policy").
MIC (2006): Communications News, Vol. 17, no. 23. See: http://www.soumu.go.jp/joho_tsusin/eng/newsletter.html.
Ofcom: - (2005a): Final statements on the Strategic Review of Telecommunications, and undertakings in lieu of a reference under the Enterprise Act 2002 (Strategic Review), 22 September 2005. - (2005b): Next Generation Networks: Further Consultation, 30 June.
OPTA (2006): "KPN's Next Generation Network: All-IP", Position paper, OPTA/BO/2006/202771; October 2 (in Dutch).