Mulraine, Millan L. B. (2006): Real Exchange Rate Dynamics With Endogenous Distribution Costs.
Download (361kB) | Preview
The importance of distribution costs in generating the deviations from the law of one price has been well documented. In this paper we show that a two-country flexible price dynamic general equilibrium model driven by exogenous innovations to technology, and with a localized distribution services sector can replicate the key dynamic features of the real exchange rate. In doing so, the paper identifies the importance of two key channels for real exchange rate dynamics. That is, we show: (i) that shocks in the real sector are important contributors to movements in the real exchange rate, and (ii) that the endogenous wedge created by distribution costs of traded goods is a significant source of fluctuation for the real exchange rate, and the overall macro-economy as a whole. The evidence presented here demonstrates that this model - without any nominal rigidities, can account for up to 89% of the relative volatility in the real exchange rate.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Real Exchange Rate Dynamics With Endogenous Distribution Costs|
|Keywords:||Distribution costs; Real exchange rate dynamics; Law of one price|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E37 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
|Depositing User:||Millan L. B. Mulraine|
|Date Deposited:||20. Sep 2006|
|Last Modified:||23. Feb 2015 04:55|
Alexius, A. (2005). Productivity shocks and real exchange rates. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52:555–566.
Backus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J., and Kydland, F. E. (1992). International business cycles. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(4):745–775.
Backus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J., and Kydland, F. E. (1994). Dynamics of the trade balance and the terms of trade: The J-curve. American Economics Review, 84:84–103.
Balassa, B. (1964). The purchasing power parity doctrine: A reappraisal. The Journal of Political Economy, 72:584–596.
Baxter, M. (1995). International trade and business cycles. In Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, K. S., editors, Handbook of International Economics, volume 3, pages 1801–1864. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Betts, C. and Devereux, M. B. (1996). The exchange rate in a model of pricing-to-market. European Economic Review, 40:1007–1021.
Betts, C. and Kehoe, T. (2001). Tradability of goods and real exchange rate fluctuations. FRBM, Research Department Staff Report.
Boileau, M. (2002). Trade in capital goods and investment-specific technical change. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26:963–984.
Burstein, A. T., Neves, J. C., and Rebelo, S. (2003). Distribution costs and real exchange rate dynamics during exchange-rate-based stabilizations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1189-1214).
Burstein, A. T., Neves, J. C., and Rebelo, S. (2004). Investment prices and exchange rates: Some basic facts. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3):302–309.
Carr, J. L. and Floyd, J. E. (2002). Real and monetary shocks to the Canadian dollar: Do Canada and the United States form an optimal currency area? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 13:21–39.
Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P. J., and McGratten, E. R. (2002). Can sticky price models generate volatile and persistent real exchange rate? Review of Economic Studies, 69:533–563.
Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and real exchange rate changes. Journal of Political Economy, 84:1161–1176.
Fisher, J. D. M. (1999). The new view on growth and business cycles. Economic Perspectives, 23(1):34–56.
Fisher, J. D. M. (2003). Technology shocks matter. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, WP-02-14.
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., and Huffman, G. W. (1988). Investment capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. The American Economic Review, 78:402–417.
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., and Krusell, P. (2000). The role of investment-specific technological change in the business cycle. The European Economic Review, 44:91–115.
Jin, Y. and Zeng, Z. (2005). Volatile and persistent exchange rates: How important are distribution costs? Mimeo.
Kehoe, P. J. and Perri, F. (2002). International business cycles with endogenous incomplete markets. Econometrica, 70(3):907–928.
King, R. G., Plosser, C. I., and Rebelo, S. T. (1988). Production, growth and business cycles, I: The basic neoclassical model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21:196–232.
Kollmann, R. (1996). Incomplete asset markets and the cross-country consumption correlation puzzle. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20:945–961.
Lane, P. R. (2001). The new open econoomy macroeconomics: A survey. Journal of International Economics, 54:235–266.
Letendre, M.-A. and Luo, D. (2005). Investment-specific shocks and external balances in a small open economy model. McMaster University, Mimeo.
Mulraine, M. L. B. (2004). Investment-specific technology shocks in a small open economy. University of Toronto, Mimeo.
Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (1995). Exchange rate dynamics redux. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3):624–660.
Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (2000). The six puzzles in international economics: Is there a common cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, 15(1):339–390.
Samuelson, P. A. (1964). Theoretical notes on trade patterns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 23:145–154.
Schmitt-Groh´e, S. and Uribe, M. (2003). Closing the small open economy model. Journal of International Economics, 61:163–185.