Reinhart, Carmen and Calvo, Guillermo and Fernandez Arias, Eduardo and Talvi, Ernesto (2001): The Growth-Interest Rate Cycle in the United States and its Consequences for Emerging Markets.
Download (189kB) | Preview
At the time of writing there were widespread concerns about the health of the U.S. economy. There is conclusive evidence that the pace of growth has slowed, which has prompted the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates on two occasions (a total of 100 basis points thus far). As usual, when faced with this kind of turning point, analysts and policy makers alike wonder whether the United States will achieve a “soft landing” or whether the downturn is more serious and protracted—in the worst scenario, the new weakness could signal the end of the new economy. Furthermore, recent inflation surprises have not been encouraging, as higher-thanexpected inflation numbers may curtail the Federal Reserve’s desire and ability to act countercyclically. In this paper, we do not attempt to provide any insights into what lies ahead for the U.S. economy. Our focus is on gaining a better understanding of how the U.S. business cycle, its associated monetary policy cycle, and their interaction affect developing countries. The question of North-South linkages is hardly a new one; the role of trade and primary commodity markets in linking developed and developing countries has a long history (see, for instance, Prebisch, 1950 and Singer, 1950). The links between debtor and creditor nations are also not new (see Diaz- Alejandro, 1984, Dornbusch, 1985, and Calvo, Leiderman, and Reinhart, 1993). Indeed, what is “new” is that some links that had been thought to be extinct have revived in recent years while some “old” links have weakened. As Bordo and Eichengreen (1998) observe, the decade of the 1990s shares some of the features of an earlier age of globalization and high capital mobility prior to World War I; namely, portfolio capital flows to emerging markets have re-emerged as an important link between northern lenders and southern borrowers. This revival is particularly pronounced in the larger Latin American countries. Some of the traditional links, however, may have weakened, as many countries in Asia and Latin America have successfully diversified their exports away from primary commodities. Hence, terms-of-trade shocks may (in some cases) play a smaller role today than in the past. Both of these observations would suggest that, in general, trade/commodity price links may have weakened while financial links may have become stronger. However, one must be cautious in interpretation owing to the large variation across countries in the degree of trade and capital market integration. While the share of primarycommodities in Mexico’s exports has declined dramatically in the past 30 years, the importance of U.S. markets, owing to NAFTA, has soared, which suggests that the trade channel is quantitatively important in the Mexican case.2 These are the questions we analyze. Our focus is on how developments in the United States affect capital flows and growth in emerging market countries across various regions and country groups.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Growth-Interest Rate Cycle in the United States and its Consequences for Emerging Markets|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F30 - General
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F32 - Current Account Adjustment; Short-Term Capital Movements
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E00 - General
|Depositing User:||Carmen Reinhart|
|Date Deposited:||11. Jun 2008 11:44|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 18:42|
Bordo, M.D., B. Eichengreen and J. Kim. 1998. “Was There Really an Earlier Period of International Financial Integration Comparable to Today?” NBER Working Paper 6738. Cambridge, United States: National Bureau of Economic Research. Borensztein, E. and C.M. Reinhart. 1994. “The Macroeconomic Determinants of Commodity Prices.” IMF Staff Papers 41(2): 236-260. Calvo, G., L. Leiderman and C.M. Reinhart. 1993. “Capital Inflows and the Real Exchange Rate in Latin America: The Role of External Factors.” IMF Staff Papers 40(1): 108-150. Calvo, S., and C.M. Reinhart. 1996. “Capital Flows to Latin America: Is There Evidence of Contagion Effects?” In: G. Calvo, M. Goldstein and E. Hochreiter, editors. Private Capital Flows to Emerging Markets After the Mexican Crisis. Washington, DC, United States: Institute for International Economics. Chu, K-Y., and T.K. Morrison. 1984. “The 1981-82 Recession and Non-Oil Primary Commodity Prices.” IMF Staff Papers 31(1): 93-140. Diaz-Alejandro, C. 1984. “I Don’t Think We’re in Kansas Anymore.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 335-403. Dornbusch, R. 1985. “Policy and Performance Links between LDC Debtors and Industrial Nations.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 303-356. Fernández-Arias, E. 1996. “The New Wave of Private Capital Inflows: Push or Pull?” Journal of Development Economics 48: 389-418. Frankel, J.A. and N.R. Roubini. 2000. “The Role of Industrial Country Policies in Emerging Market Crises.” Paper prepared for the NBER Conference on Economic and Financial Crises in Emerging Market Economies, Woodstock, United States. Frankel, J.A., S. Schmukler, and L. Servén. 2001. “Verifiability and the Vanishing Intermediate Exchange Rate Regime.” In: S. Collins and D. Rodrik, editors. Policy Challenges in the Next Millennium. Washington, DC, United States: Brookings Institution. Holtham, G.H. 1988. “Modeling Commodity Prices in a World Macroeconomic Model.” In: O. Guvenen, editor. International Commodity Market Models and Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press. International Monetary Fund. 1999. Direction of Trade Statistics. Washington, DC, United States: International Monetary Fund. ----. 2000. World Economic Outlook Database. www.imf.org. Márquez, J. 1988. “Income and Price Elasticities for Exports of Developing Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70(2): 306-314. ----. 1990. “Bilateral Trade Elasticities,” Review of Economics and Statistics 72(1): 70-77. Prebisch, R. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. New York, United States: United Nations. Reinhart, C.M. 1995. “Devaluation, Relative Prices, and Trade.” IMF Staff Papers 42(2): 290- 310. Reinhart, C.M. and V.R. Reinhart. 2001. “What Hurts Most? G-3 Exchange Rate or Interest Rate Volatility?” Paper prepared for NBER Conference on Currency Crises, Palo Alto, United States. Singer, H.W. 1950. “The Distribution of Gains Between Investing and Borrowing Countries.” American Economic Review 40: 473-85.