Commendatore, Pasquale and Panico, Carlo and Pinto, Antonio (2007): Composition of public expenditure, effective demand, distribution and growth.
Download (847Kb) | Preview
We introduce public expenditure (PE) in a general post Keynesian framework characterized by a nonlinear investment function. Our aims are: 1) to provide a systematic analysis of the impact of PE (‘productive’ or ‘non productive’) and of the Government sector size on economic growth, allowing effective demand to play a crucial role. Our work fills a lacuna in the post Keynesian literature given that scant attention has been devoted to this topic. In our paper, ‘Productive’ PE affects the (fixed) coefficients of production similarly to Barro (1990); 2) to compare and contrast two different interpretations which assign a different meaning to the autonomous component of the investment function, corresponding to long run demand growth expectations: the Kaleckian interpretation assumes exogenous long run expectations; in the Classical or Harrodian interpretation, long-run expectations are linked to the ‘warranted rate of growth’; 3) to reproduce a variety of complex phenomena (multiple equilibria, hysteresis, low growth traps, regular and irregular growth cycles), by introducing a simple nonlinearity in the investment function in the spirit of Kalecki’s (1937) investment theory and Kaldor’s (1940) trade cycle model. A plethora of results emerge from our simple framework concerning comparative statics and dynamicbehaviour.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Composition of public expenditure, effective demand, distribution and growth|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
|Depositing User:||Pasquale Commendatore|
|Date Deposited:||11. Jun 2008 07:29|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 00:43|
Amadeo, E.J. (1986), ‘The role of capacity utilization in long-period analysis’, Political Economy, 2(2), 147-85.
Barro, R.J. (1990), ‘Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S103-25.
Bischi G., R.Dieci, G. Rodano, E. Saltari (2001), ‘Multiple attractors and global bifurcations in a Kaldor-type business cycle model’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11, 527-554.
Commendatore, P. (2006), ‘Are Kaleckian models relevant for the long run?’, in Panico, C. and Salvadori N. (eds), Classical, Neoclassical and Keynesian Views on Growth and Distribution, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, England
Commendatore, P., C. Panico, and A. Pinto (2005), ‘Government debt, growth and inequality in income distribution’, in Salvadori, N. and R. Balducci, (eds), Innovation, Unemployment and Policy in the Theories of Growth and Distribution, Elgar, 223-37.
Devarajan S, Swaroop V, Zou H. (1996), The composition of public expenditure and economic growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 313-344
Dutt, A.K. (1984), ‘Stagnation, income distribution, and monopoly power’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8, 25-40. Kaldor, N. (1940), ‘A Model of Trade Cycle’, The Economic Journal, 50(197), 79-82.
Kaldor, N. (1958), ‘Monetary policy, economic stability and growth: a Memorandum submitted to the Radcliffe Committee on the Working of the Monetary System’, June 23, Principal Memoranda of Evidence, Cmnd 827, London HMSO (1960), 146-53. reprinted in N. Kaldor (1964), Essays on the Economic Policy I, London, Duckworth, 128-53.
Kaldor, N. (1966), Causes of the Slow Rate of Growth of the United Kingdom: An Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, reprinted in N. Kaldor (1978), Further Essays on Economic Theory, London Duckworth.
Kaldor, N. (1967), Strategic Factors in Economic Development, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
Kaldor, N. (1971), ‘Conflicts in national economic objectives’, Economic Journal, 81, 1-16, reprinted in N. Kaldor (1978), Further Essays on Economic Theory, London Duckworth.
Lavoie, M. (1995), ‘The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(6), 789-818.
Lavoie, M. (1996), ‘Traverse, hysteresis, and normal rates of capacity utilization in Kaleckian model of growth and distribution’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 28(4), 113-47.
Lavoie, M. (2000), ‘Government deficits in simple Kaleckian models’, in Bougrine, H. (ed), The Economics of Public Spending: Debts Deficits and Economic Performance, Edwar Elgar, Aldershot.
Pressman, S. (1994), ‘The composition of government spending: does it make any difference?’, Review of Political Economy, 6(2), 221-39.
Rowthorn, R.E. (1981), ‘Demand, real wages, and economic growth’, Thames Papers in Political Economy, Autumn, 1-39.
Shaikh, A. (2007), ‘Economic Policy in a Growth Contest: A Classical Synthesis of Keynes and Harrod’, mimeo, New York New school University. http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/
You, J.I. and A.K. Dutt (1996), ‘Government debt, income distribution and growth’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20, 335-51.