Oliveira, Márcia and Côrte-Real, Paulo (2006): Poverty Alleviation Programs: Monitoring vs. Workfare.
Download (198Kb) | Preview
The role of Poverty Alleviation Programs (PAP) in �ghting poverty and ensuring the satisfaction of basic economic needs is well known. How- ever, informational asymmetries create the need for adequate instruments to prevent fraud. This paper provides a static model of adverse selection where the gov- ernment (principal) aims to minimize the costs of a PAP that ensures that all individuals have access to an exogenously de�ned minimum in- come level. Agents may di¤er in their income-generating ability and disutility of labor. Under the di¤erent informational environments, we study the ef- fectiveness of workfare (that involves unpaid and unproductive work in the public sector) as a screening device, based on the comparison with standard monitoring. We �nd that when disutility of labor is the only unobservable variable, a workfare policy is ine¢ cient because it �crowds out�private sector work and signi�cantly increases the costs of the program. Under this informa- tional context, monitoring may be the best instrument for preventing fraud. When income-generating ability is the only unobservable variable, choosing between workfare and monitoring depends not only on the cost function associated with the latter, but also on income distribution. The analysis of this case would suggest that a workfare policy might be inef- �cient in the context of undeveloped countries where income distribution exhibits strong inequalities, but appropriate in developed ones. These conclusions suggest that a mixed policy combining workfare and monitor- ing may be optimal when both income-generating ability and disutility of labor are unknown.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Faculdade de Economia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa|
|Original Title:||Poverty Alleviation Programs: Monitoring vs. Workfare|
|Keywords:||Poverty Alleviation Programs; fraud; monitoring; work- fare|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
|Depositing User:||Márcia Oliveira|
|Date Deposited:||24. Nov 2006|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 17:21|
Barnes, M (1999). New Deal: Welfare-to-Work in the U.K. University of Essex Department ef Economics, Msc Economics Dissertation Beaudry P, Blackorby C (1998) Taxes and Employment Subsidies in Optimal Redistribution Program. NBER Working PaperNo. 6355 Besley T, Coate S (1992) Workfare vs Welfare: Incentive Arguments For Work Requirements In Poverty-Alleviation Programs. American Economic Re- view 82: 249-261 Besley T, Coate S. (1995) The Design of Income Maintenance Programmes. Review of Economic Studies 62: 187-221 Brett C (1998) Who should be on workfare? The use of work requirements as part of an optimal tax mix. Oxford Economic Papers 50: 607-622 Cardoso A, Ramos G (2002) Integrated approaches to active welfare and employment policies - Portugal. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living Condition Cu¤K (2000) Optimality ofWorkfare with Heterogeneous Preferences. Cana- dian Journal of Economics 33,149-174 Garoupa N (1997) The Theory of Optimal Law Enforcement, Journal of Economic Surveys 11, 267-295 LeBlanc G (1998) Optimal Income Maintenance and The �Unemployable. Concordia University (Canada), Department of Economics,Working Paper DP9809 Polinsky AM, Shavell S (2000) The Economics Theory of Public Enforcement Law. Journal of Economic Literature 38, 45-76 Ravallion M (1999) The World Bank Research Observer, Vol.14, No.1 (Feb- ruary) Rodrigues CF (2000) Anti-poverty e¤ectiveness and e¢ ciency of the Guar- anteed Minimum Income Programme in Portugal. ISEG/ Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Working Paper Schroyen F, Torsvik G (1999) Work Requirements and Long Term Poverty. University of Bergen, Department of Economics, Working Paper 0899 Subbarao K (1997) PublicWorks as an Anty-Poverty Program: An Overview of Cross-Country Experience. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (May): 78:83 Tranaes T, Hansen CT (1999) OPtimal Workfare in a Society of Workers and Non workers. Manuscript EPRU, University of Copenhagen Tranaes T, Hansen CT (1999) Optimal workfare in unemployment insurance, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Working Paper Wilson S, Fretwell D (1996) Public Service Employment: A Review of Pro- grammes in Selected OECD Countries and Transition Economies. Working Paper 6 on Regional Development Policies. OECD, Paris