Hopfensitz, Astrid and Wranik, Tanja (2008): Psychological and environmental determinants of myopic loss aversion.
Download (536Kb) | Preview
Each economic actor is characterized by his own evaluations, traits, and strategies. Although heterogeneity of economic actors is widely acknowledged, little is known about the factors causing it. In this paper, we will examine the behavioral bias known as myopic loss aversion, and the environmental and psychological factors leading to different behavioral reactions. Myopic loss aversion has been used to suggest that fund managers should reveal information only rarely, to lead investors to choose options with (on average) higher returns.
Specifically, we experimentally studied the impact of experience, individual differences, and emotions on behavioral responses to feedback frequency in an investment setting. Participants made investment decisions in one of three feedback frequency conditions: (1) they received feedback after each round and had the opportunity to make investment changes each time; (2) they received feedback after each round, but were only given the possibility to make changes every three rounds; and (3) they received aggregated feedback every three rounds, and also had the opportunity to make changes every three rounds. We collected information about personality and individual difference factors before the experiment. Finally, evaluations and emotions were measured every three rounds, immediately after feedback was given.
We hypothesized that myopic loss aversion is not a general phenomenon, but that stable individual differences lead to different evaluations and emotional reactions concerning feedback. This implies that myopic loss aversion will only be present for some groups of people under certain conditions. As predicted, we found that myopic loss aversion is not generally observed; rather, we found both an experience effect and a personality effect. In particular, myopic loss aversion was particularly likely: (1) when initial investment rounds lead to negative investment experiences (i.e., losses); and (2) for investors with low self-efficacy concerning the investment situation. ‘Self efficacy’ is related to a personality profile characterized by confidence in decision-making abilities, high optimism, and low anxiety. Our results may help explain which individual and situational factors lead to myopic loss aversion, and should help researchers and practitioners provide optimal feedback to different types of investment clients.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Psychological and environmental determinants of myopic loss aversion|
|Keywords:||myopic loss aversion; risk taking; character traits; self efficacy; emotions; personality|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D53 - Financial Markets
G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D14 - Personal Finance
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
|Depositing User:||Astrid Hopfensitz|
|Date Deposited:||26. Jun 2008 01:32|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 07:29|
Ameriks, J., Wranik, T., Salovey, P., and LaBarge, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence and investor behavior. Vanguard Perspectives, 2, 17-21.
Axtell, R. (2007). What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(2):105-122.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Barber, B. and Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261-292.
Barron, G. and Erev, I. (2000). On the relationship between decisions in one-shot and repeated tasks: Experimental results and the possibility of general models. Mimeo, Technion.
Bellemare, C., Krause, M., Kroeger, S., and Zhang, C. (2005). Myopic loss aversion: information feedback vs. investment flexibility. Economics Letters, 87(3):319-324.
Ben-Shakhar, G., Bornstein, G., Hopfensitz, A., and van Winden, F. (2007). Reciprocity and emotions in bargaining using physiological and self-report measures. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(3): 314-323.
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1):73-92.
Biais, B., Hilton, D., Mazurier, K., and Pouget, S. (2005). Judgmental overconfidence, self monitoring and trading performance in an experimental financial market, Review of Economic Studies, 72:287–313.
Carver, C. S., and Scheier, M. F. (2002). The hopeful optimist. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 288-290.
De Cremer, D., Zeelenberg, M., and Murnighan, J. K. (Eds.) (2006). Social Psychology and Economics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, C. D. (2002). Winning the loser’s game: Timeless strategies for successful investing. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ellsworth, P. and Scherer, K.R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R.J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, and K.R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of the affective sciences (pp. 572-595). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):817-868.
Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gneezy, U., Kapteyn, A., and Potters, J. (2003). Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. Journal of Finance, 58(2):821-838.
Gneezy, U. and Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2):631-645.
Griner, L. A., and Smith, C. A. (2000). Contributions of motivational orientation to appraisal and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 727-740.
Haigh, M. and List, J. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. The Journal of Finance, LX(1):523-534.
Haltiwanger, J. and Waldman, M. (1985). Rational Expectations and the Limits of Rationality: An Analysis of Heterogeneity. The American Economic Review, 75(3):326-340.
Haltiwanger, J. and Waldman, M. (1991). Responders versus non-responders: a new perspective on heterogeneity. The Economic Journal, 101:1085-1102.
Hilton, D. J. (2001). The psychology of financial decision-making: Applications to trading, dealing, and investment analysis. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2:37-53.
Holt, C., and Laury, S.K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effect, The American Economic Review, 92(5):1644-1655.
Hopfensitz, A. and van Winden, F. (2008). Dynamic Choice, Independence, and Emotions. Theory and Decision, 64: 249-300.
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., and Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17-34.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47:263-291.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1984). Choices Values and Frames, American Psychologist, XXXIX:341–50.
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin Increases Trust In Humans, Nature, 435:473–476.
Langer, T. and Weber, M. (2001). Prospect theory, mental accounting and differnces in aggregated and segregated evaluation of lottery portfolios. Management Science, 47:716-733.
Langer, T. and Weber, M. (2005). Myopic prospect theory vs. myopic loss aversion: Does myopia always hurt? Mimeo, University of Mannheim.
Langer, T. and Weber, M. (forthcoming). Does commitment or feedback influence myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. forthcoming Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
Loewenstein, G. and Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? predicting future feelings. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N., editors, Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, pages 85–105. Russell Sage Foundation Press.
Maner, J. K., and Schmidt, N. B. (2006). The Role of Risk Avoidance in Anxiety. Behavior Therapy, 37, 181-189.
Mehra, R. and Prescott, E. C. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15:145-161.
Salovey, P. (2001). Applied emotional intelligence: Regulating emotions to become healthy, wealthy, and wise. In Ciarrochi, J., Forgas, J. P., & Mayer, J. D. (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life: A scientific inquiry (pp. 168-215). Philadelphia, PA: Psychological Press.
Sanfey, A., Rilling, J., Aronson, J., Nystrom, L. and Cohen J. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision making in the ultimatum game, Science, 300: 1755–1758.
Seligman, M. E. P., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55, 5-15.
Shiv, B., Loewenstein, G. and Bechara, A., (2005a). The dark side of emotion in decision-making: When individuals with decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous decisions, Cognitive Brain Research, 23:85-92.
Shiv, B., Loewenstein, G., Bechara, A., Damasio, H. and Damasio, A., (2005b). Investment Behavior and the Negative Side of Emotions, Psychological Science, 16(6):435-439.
Thaler, R., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., and Schwartz, A. (1997). The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2):647-661.
Thaler, R. (1985), Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice, Marketing Science, IV:199–214.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, V:297–323.
van Reekum, C., and Scherer, K. R. (1997). Levels of processing in emotion-antecedent appraisal. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 259-300). New York: Elsevier.
van Reekum, C., Banse, R., Johnstone, T., Etter, A., Wehrle and T., Scherer, K.R. (2004). Psychophysiological responses to appraisal responses in a computer game. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 663-688.
Wranik, T. (2005). Personality under stress, who gets angry and why? Individual differences in appraisal and emotion. Doctoral dissertation, 336, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Wranik, T., Ameriks, J., and Salovey, P. (2008). The role of emotional intelligence, personality, and impulsivity for real life financial investment decisions and behaviors. Working Paper, Yale University, USA.
Wranik, T., and Hopfensitz, A. (2008). Individual differences, emotions, and financial investment decision-making. Working Paper, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Wranik, T., and Scherer, K. R. (2008). Failure at work: Who gets the blame? Working Paper, University of Geneva, Switzerland.