Future scenarios of the modernized agriculture and a Sraffian framework for the “return of techniques” scenario

Sortino, Antonio and Chang Ting Fa, Margherita and Piccinini, Livio Clemente (2008): Future scenarios of the modernized agriculture and a Sraffian framework for the “return of techniques” scenario. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Rural areas in Europe are characterized by several agricultural models and paths. We can schematically divide them in two typologies of agriculture: the modernized and the traditional agriculture. The first typology is characterized by agricultural techniques of production pervaded by industrial (or modernized) elements and values. It is based on the most fertile soils of the European rural areas. The modernized agriculture has also reached elevated levels of productivity but it lacks in socio-environmental terms (i.e. biodiversity losses). The traditional agriculture, instead, has his base on the less favored areas and it is an unintentional keeper of traditional and virtuous techniques and elements (i.e. crop rotation and local genetic resources). It is such because it does not accept exogenous elements (i.e. mountainous agriculture where mechanization is applied with low efficiency/effectiveness) and it has therefore remained excluded from the processes of industrialization. The weak point of traditional agriculture, which has caused its decline, is the economic inefficiency. It is however an unknowing producer of positive externalities (i.e. safe food, local genetic resources, landscape). In our paper we try to assess the hypothesis of the return of traditional elements and techniques in the modernized agriculture. In order to analyze the problem, we shall introduce the theoretical framework of the “re-switching of techniques” from the neo-ricardian theory (Sraffa 1960). Sraffa, within the “re-switching” framework, pointed out that a low-capital-intensive technique may be competitive both at a relatively low and high rate of profit. Finally, after we have shown two examples of economic models of “re-switching of techniques”, we shall build an example of “re-switching” for the short period and an original example with multiple-switching points.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Re-switching of techniques, modernized agriculture, traditional agriculture, sustainable development
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q19 - Other

References

Arnalte, E. and D. Ortiz, 2006. Tendenze dell’agricoltura spagnola. Difficoltà di attuazione di un modello di sviluppo rurale basato sulla multifunzionalità in agricoltura. In: Cavazzani A., Politiche, Governance e Innovazione per le aree rurali, INEA, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Napoli. Ciaccia D. and R. Finuola, 2006. Il sistema agroalimentare italiano 2005, in INEA, Rapporto sullo stato dell’agricoltura italiana, Roma. INEA, 2006. L’agricoltura italiana conta 2006, INEA, Roma. Marzano, F. 1975. Problemi relativi alla definizione del capitale. In: Istat, Annali di statistica, Serie VIII, n. 28, Roma. Massoli B., 2004. Le aziende autoconsumistiche in Italia. Conference: Bioregionalismo e Benessere: alla ricerca di una nuova sinergia ecologica e alimentare tra etica e utopia. Attese dei consumatori, aggiustamenti produttivi e esternalità, Udine, Italy, November 4-5. Miceli F., O. Porfiri and P. Perrino, 2000. Conservation of hulled wheat genetic resources. The farro network. Proceedings of the Congress: Neolithization between East and West, Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, Udine, Italy. Piomponi M., R. Finuola, L. Briamonte, S. Vaccai and A. Cristofaro, 2006. Principali eventi di politica agraria. in INEA, Rapporto sullo stato dell’agricoltura italiana, Roma. Ricossa, S. 1982. Dizionario di economia. UTET, Torino. Roncaglia A. 2003. La macroeconomia dopo Sraffa. International conference Piero Sraffa, Accademia nazionale dei Lincei, Roma. Samuelson, P. 1966. A summing up. In: Quartely Journal of Economics, vol. 80 pp. 568-583 Sortino, A., 2007. L’inquadramento teorico del paradigma dello sviluppo rurale endogeno. In: Agribusiness Paesaggio & Ambiente, Vol. 10, n. 2. Sortino, A. and M. Chang Ting Fa, 2007. Pattern endogeni di sviluppo dell’agricoltura dicotomizzata: basi teoriche per una nuova politica agricola comunitaria. Conference Politiche agro-ambientali e oltre, University of Bologna, Italy, May 16 In press. Sraffa, P., 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities, prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge University Press. Turner, R. K., D.W. Pearce and I. Bateman, 1996. Economia ambientale, il Mulino, Bologna UNDP, 2005. Rapporto sullo sviluppo umano, UNDP, Roma. van der Ploeg, J.D., 1992. Dynamics and mechanisms of endogenous development: an introduction to the theme of the seminar, in Options Méditerranéennes, sér. A./n.23 – Strengthening endogenous development patterns in European agriculture, Camar, Crete, October 20-22. van der Ploeg, J.D., 2006. Oltre la modernizzazione, processi di sviluppo rurale in Europa. Rubettino, Catanzaro.