Munich Personal RePEc Archive

The geometry of consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation

Pivato, Marcus (2008): The geometry of consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation.

[img]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_9608.pdf

Download (119Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Given a set of propositions with unknown truth values, a `judgement aggregation rule' is a way to aggregate the personal truth-valuations of a set of jurors into some `collective' truth valuation. We introduce the class of `quasimajoritarian' judgement aggregation rules, which includes majority vote, but also includes some rules which use different weighted voting schemes to decide the truth of different propositions. We show that if the profile of jurors' beliefs satisfies a condition called `value restriction', then the output of any quasimajoritarian rule is logically consistent; this directly generalizes the recent work of Dietrich and List (2007). We then provide two sufficient conditions for value-restriction, defined geometrically in terms of a lattice ordering or an ultrametric structure on the set of jurors and propositions. Finally, we introduce another sufficient condition for consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation, called `convexity'. We show that convexity is not logically related to value-restriction.

Commentary/Response Threads

  • Pivato, Marcus The geometry of consistent majoritarian judgement aggregation. (deposited 17. Jul 2008 01:06) [Currently Displayed]
UB_LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.