Hamid, Naved (2006): South Asia: A development strategy for the information age. Published in: ADB Report on the South Asia Department Economists’ Annual Conference 2006 (December 2007): 07-16.
Download (100kB) | Preview
Over the last 50 years, Asia has been the most successful region in the world in terms of rapid economic development. The success of Asia is largely because of the adoption of the (Manufactured) Export-Oriented Growth Strategy or (M)EOGS by one group of countries after another. (M)EOGS, modeled on Japan’s postwar strategy, was successfully followed by the four “Asian tigers” (Hong Kong, China; Singapore; Republic of Korea; and Taipei, China). It was subsequently, adopted by a number of Southeast Asian countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand), followed by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and, more recently, by Viet Nam. The question is: Will this process continue to extend to other countries in Asia, with South Asian countries ultimately becoming the manufacturing export power houses of the future? The answer to the first part of the question is probably yes, and to the second part, probably no—and therefore the need for an alternate strategy. This paper looks at some features of (M)EOGS in East/Southeast Asia, its limitations in the case of South Asia, and then present an alternative development strategy which may be more appropriate for South Asia.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||South Asia: A development strategy for the information age|
|Keywords:||Alternative development models; Trade; Regional cooperation; Economic integration; South Asia|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology
|Depositing User:||Naved Hamid|
|Date Deposited:||24. Jul 2008 10:30|
|Last Modified:||23. Mar 2015 10:39|
Bardhan, Ashok, and Cynthia Kroll. 2003. The new wave of outsourcing. Fisher Center Research Reports Paper No 1103. University of California: Berkeley.
Blinder, Alan. 2005. Fear of offshoring. Center for Economic Policy Studies (CEPS) Working Paper No. 119. Princeton University.
Dossani, Rafiq, and Martin Kenney. 2005. Went for cost, stayed for quality: moving the back office to India. Asia Pacific Research Center, Stanford University.
Little, Ian, Tibor Scitovsky, and Maurice Scott. 1970. Industry and trade in some developing countries: a comparative study. Oxford University Press.
McKinsey and Company. 2005. The emerging global labor market. McKinsey Global Institute.
Minevich, Mark, and Frank-Jürgen Richter. 2005. Global outsourcing report 2005. New York: Global Ventures Inc. and Geneva: Horasis.
Radwan, Ismail, and Gihani Fernando. 2006. Offshore to Sri Lanka: finding Sri Lanka’s offshoring niche. Washington DC: World Bank.
van Welsum, Desirée, and Xavier Reif. 2005. Potential offshoring: evidence from selected OECD countries. Brookings Trade Forum 2005: 165–4.
van Welsum, Desirée, and Graham Vickory. 2006. The share of employment potentially affected by offshoring – an empirical investigation. OECD Working Party on the Information Economy Report DATI/ICCP/IE(2005)8. Paris.
Williamson, John (ed.) 1990. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.