Munich Personal RePEc ArchiveCan proactive fuel economy strategies help automakers mitigate fuel price risk?WalterMcManusauthorDetroit automakers have opposed mandated improvements in fuel economy since legislation was first proposed in the 1970’s. Their opposition is based, among other considerations, on the assumption that their customers value fuel economy only when fuel prices are high. This paper presents the findings of our on-going research that strongly refutes this assumption. Using data on sales, prices, and attributes of vehicles in 2005, we find that consumers are willing to pay, on average, $578 per MPG for higher fuel economy. At the price of gasoline prevailing in 2005, $2.30 per gallon, the $578 per MPG that consumers are willing to pay for fuel economy implies that consumers put more weight in choosing vehicles on future fuel savings than most analysts (including ourselves) had thought. The paper incorporates these new data-driven estimates of the value of fuel economy into an automotive market simulation model that has three components: a consumer demand function that predicts consumers’ vehicle choices as functions of vehicle price, fuel price, and vehicle attributes (the new estimates of the value of fuel economy are used to set the parameters of the demand function); an engineering and economic evaluation of feasible fuel economy improvements by 2010; and a game theoretic analysis of manufacturers’ competitive interactions. Using our model, we estimated the market shares and profits of automakers in 128 separate scenarios defined by alternative plausible values for the price of fuel and consumers’ discount rates. Under the fuel price risks and the competitive risks that automakers face, our analysis concludes that a proactive strategy of pursuing fuel economy improvements— above and beyond what is required by law—would increase annual profits for Ford ($0.5 billion to $1.4 billion), GM ($0.2 billion to $0.5 billion, and DaimlerChrysler ($0.1 billion). Even if the uncertainty over fuel price were removed, all three automakers would increase profits by pursuing fuel economy improvements, though the gains are smaller with fuel at $2.00/gallon.Q59 - OtherL62 - Automobiles ; Other Transportation Equipment ; Related Parts and Equipment2006-09-14MPRA Paper

Copyright Agreement

1. The author hereby affirms that he or she accepts the editorial guidelines given at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/information.html.

2. The author hereby grants to the University Library of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) a non-exclusive licence to make the electronic version of the uploaded work publicly accessible through the "Munich Personal RePEc Archive" (MPRA) repository. This licence includes abstracts and metadata and is valid for the duration of the statutory protection period, without territorial limitation. The licence furthermore includes the right to replicate the work as required, especially for the purposes of including the work and/or abstracts and metadata in electronic databases and of employing digital or other transmission technology to make this data available to large numbers of users, using either services invoked by user request or services initiated by the repository, and encompassing all forms of transmission (cable, wireless, satellite etc.) and protocol (TCP/IP, http, ftp etc.).

3. This contract entitles the University Library to transfer the licence granted herein either partially or wholly to a third party and to grant non-exclusive rights to other repositories without requiring the authors explicit permission.

4. The author hereby affirms that no third-party rights are infringed by the electronic publication of the work and undertakes to indemnify the University Library of the LMU against any third-party claims relating to the infringement of copyright legislation or exclusive usage rights which may result from the publication of the work through the University Library repository. The author hereby undertakes to reimburse any charges resulting from a rights infringement caused by him or her.

5. In the event that the author is not the sole author of the work in question, he/she hereby declares that he/she has been empowered by his/her co-authors to grant the above-mentioned usage licence.

6. In the event that the person who is uploading the work in question is not the author of this work, he/she hereby declares that he/she has been empowered by the author(s) to grant the above-mentioned usage licence.

7. The author continues to retain the usage rights to his or her work and may also bestow these rights elsewhere provided this does not curtail the rights granted to the University Library of the LMU in this declaration.

Clicking on the deposit button below indicates your agreement to these terms.

As the submission cannot be modified once it is accepted, please submit only if you are absolutely sure that no further changes are needed. Otherwise select the "Save for Later" button and review your submission. By doing so, nothing you have entered will be lost and you can resume your submission any time in the future.