Munich Personal RePEc ArchiveMethods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets ComparedKesten C.GreenauthorJ. ScottArmstrongauthorAndreasGraefeauthorTraditional groups meetings are an inefficient and ineffective method for making forecasts and decisions. We compare two structured alternatives to traditional meetings: the Delphi technique and prediction markets. Delphi is relatively simple and cheap to implement and has been adopted for diverse applications in business and government since its origins in the 1950s. It can be used for nearly any forecasting, estimation, or decision making problem not barred by complexity or ignorance. While prediction markets were used more than a century ago, their popularity waned until more recent times. Prediction markets can be run continuously, and they motivate participation and participants to reveal their true beliefs. On the other hand, they need many participants and clear outcomes in order to determine pay-offs. Moreover, translating knowledge into a price is not intuitive to everyone and constructing contracts that will provide a useful forecast may not be possible for some problems. It is difficult to maintain confidentiality with markets and they are vulnerable to manipulation. Delphi is designed to reveal panelists’ knowledge and opinions via their forecasts and the reasoning they provide. This format allows testing of knowledge and learning by panelists as they refine their forecasts but may also lead to conformity due to group pressure. The reasoning provided as an output of the Delphi process is likely to be reassuring to forecast users who are uncomfortable with the “black box” nature of prediction markets. We consider that, half a century after its original development, Delphi is under-utilized.D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; UnawarenessD81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyC44 - Operations Research ; Statistical Decision TheoryC88 - Other Computer SoftwareD84 - Expectations ; SpeculationsC49 - OtherD82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design2007-08-31MPRA Paper

Copyright Agreement

1. The author hereby affirms that he or she accepts the editorial guidelines given at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/information.html.

2. The author hereby grants to the University Library of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) a non-exclusive licence to make the electronic version of the uploaded work publicly accessible through the "Munich Personal RePEc Archive" (MPRA) repository. This licence includes abstracts and metadata and is valid for the duration of the statutory protection period, without territorial limitation. The licence furthermore includes the right to replicate the work as required, especially for the purposes of including the work and/or abstracts and metadata in electronic databases and of employing digital or other transmission technology to make this data available to large numbers of users, using either services invoked by user request or services initiated by the repository, and encompassing all forms of transmission (cable, wireless, satellite etc.) and protocol (TCP/IP, http, ftp etc.).

3. This contract entitles the University Library to transfer the licence granted herein either partially or wholly to a third party and to grant non-exclusive rights to other repositories without requiring the authors explicit permission.

4. The author hereby affirms that no third-party rights are infringed by the electronic publication of the work and undertakes to indemnify the University Library of the LMU against any third-party claims relating to the infringement of copyright legislation or exclusive usage rights which may result from the publication of the work through the University Library repository. The author hereby undertakes to reimburse any charges resulting from a rights infringement caused by him or her.

5. In the event that the author is not the sole author of the work in question, he/she hereby declares that he/she has been empowered by his/her co-authors to grant the above-mentioned usage licence.

6. In the event that the person who is uploading the work in question is not the author of this work, he/she hereby declares that he/she has been empowered by the author(s) to grant the above-mentioned usage licence.

7. The author continues to retain the usage rights to his or her work and may also bestow these rights elsewhere provided this does not curtail the rights granted to the University Library of the LMU in this declaration.

Clicking on the deposit button below indicates your agreement to these terms.

As the submission cannot be modified once it is accepted, please submit only if you are absolutely sure that no further changes are needed. Otherwise select the "Save for Later" button and review your submission. By doing so, nothing you have entered will be lost and you can resume your submission any time in the future.