Simplistic vs. Complex Organization: Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks in an 'Organizational Triangle'

Elsner, Wolfram and Hocker, Gero and Schwardt, Henning (2009): Simplistic vs. Complex Organization: Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks in an 'Organizational Triangle'.

Abstract

Transaction cost economics explains organizations in a simplistic ‘market-vs.-hierarchy’ dichotomy. In this view, complex real-world coordination forms are simply considered ‘hybrids’ of those ‘pure’ and ideal forms, thus being located on a one-dimensional ‘line’ between them. This ‘organizational dichotomy’ is mainly based on relative marginal transaction costs, relative lengths of value-added chains, and ‘rational choice’ of coordination form. The present paper, in contrast, argues that pure ‘market’ and ‘hierarchy’, even including their potential hybrids, are a theoretically untenable and empirically void set. Coordination forms, it is argued, have to be conceptualized in a fundamentally different way. A relevant ‘organizational space’ must reflect the dimensions of a complex world such as dilemma-prone direct interdependence, resulting in strong strategic uncertainty, mutual externalities, collectivities, and subsequent emergent process. This, in turn, will lead either to (1) informally institutionalized, problem-solving cooperation (the instrumental dimension of the institution) or (2) mutual blockage, lock-in on an inferior path, or power- and status-based market and hierarchy failure (the ceremonial dimension of the institution). This paper establishes emergent instrumental institutionalized cooperation as a genuine organizational dimension which generates a third ‘attractor’ besides ‘market’ and ‘hierarchy’, i.e., informal network. In this way, an ‘organizational triangle’ can be generated which may serve as a more relevant heuristic device for empirical organizational research. Its ideal corners and some ideal hybrids on its edges (such as ideal clusters and ideal hub&spoke networks) still remain empirically void, but its inner space becomes empirically relevant and accessible. The ‘Organizational Triangle’ is tentatively applied (besides casual reference to corporate behavior that has lead to the current financial meltdown), by way of a set of criteria for instrumental problem-solving and a simple formal algorithm, to the cases of the supplier network of ‘DaimlerChrysler US International’ at Tuscaloosa, AL, the open-source network Linux, and the web-platforms Wikipedia and ‘Open-Source Car’. It is considered to properly reflect what is generally theorized in evolutionary-institutional economics of organizations and the firm and might offer some insight for the coming industrial reconstructions of the car and other industries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Market vs. Hierarchy; Transaction Costs; Complexity; Institutionalization; Network Formation; Hub&Spoke Supplier Networks; Open-Source Networks
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory

References

Adkisson, R.V., 2004 ‘Ceremonialism, Intellectual Property Rights, and Innovative Activity’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXVIII.2, 459-66.

Amin, A., J. Hausner (eds.), 1997, Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, Guildford and King’s Lynn: Biddles.

Armstrong, P., 2001, ‘Science, enterprise and profit: ideology in the knowledge-driven economy’, Economy and Society, 30.4, 524-52.

Arthur, W.B., 1989, ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events’, The Economic Journal, 99, 116-31.

Axelrod, R., 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, (rev. ed. 2006).

Baudry, B., Gindis, D., 2005, ‘The V-Network Form: Economic Organization and the Theory of the Firm’, mimeo., Univ. of Lyon 2, LEFI, Oct. 10, 2005.

Block, F., 2000, ‘Disorderly co-ordination: the limited capacities of states and markets’, in: Institutions and the Role of the State, ed. by Burlamaqui, L., et al., Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: E. Elgar, 53-71.

Bush, P.D., 1987, ‘The Theory of Institutional Change’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXI.3, 1075-116.

Choi, T.Y., Y. Hong, 2002, ‘Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler’, Journal of Operations Management, 20.5, 469-93.

Coase, R.H., 1937, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, IV, 386-405.

Cohendet, P., Creplet, F., Dupouet, O., 2001, Organisational Innovation, Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities: the Case of Linux’, in: Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, ed. by Kirman, A., Zimmermann, J.B., Berlin et al.: Springer. 303-26.

Commons, J.R., 1934, Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy, New York: Macmillan, repr. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Transaction Publ., 1990.

Cyert, R.M., March, J.G., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

De Laat, P.B., 2004, ‘Evolution of Open Source Networks in Industry’, The Information Society, 20.4, 291-99.

Delorme, R., 1997, The Foundational Bearing of Complexity’, in: Amin, A., J. Hauzner, (eds.), Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, Guildford and King’s Lynn: Biddles, 32-56.

Dietrich, M., 1994, Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Towards a New Economics of the Firm, London: Routledge.

Dietrich, M., J. Krafft, 2008, ‘Towards an Historically Relevant Economics of the Firm’, in: W. Elsner, H. Hanappi (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism and New Institutional Deals – Regulation, Welfare, and the New Economy, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: E. Elgar, 103-21.

Dosi, G., Winter, S.G., 2000, ‘Interpreting Economic Change: Evolution, Structures, and Games’, LEM Working Paper Series 2000/08, Pisa, Italy: Univ. of Pisa.

Dosi, G., Salvatore, R., 1992, ‘The Structure of Industrial Production and the Boundaries between Organizations and Markets’, in: A. Scott, M. Stolper (eds.), Pathways to Regional Development, Boulder, CO: Westview Pr.

Dosi, G., Giannetti, R., Toninelli, P.A., (eds.), 1992, Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Pr.

Eckert, D., St. Koch, J. Mitloehner, 2005, ‘Using the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma for Explaining the Evolution of Cooperation in Open Source Communities’, in: M. Scotto, G. Succi (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Open Source Systems, Genova, 186-91.

Elsner, W., 2000, ‘An Industrial Policy Agenda 2000 and Beyond – Experience, Theory and Policy’, in: W. Elsner, J. Groenewegen (eds.), Industrial Policies after 2000, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 411-86.

Elsner, W., 2001, ‘Interactive Economic Policy: Toward a Cooperative Policy Approach for a Negotiated Economy’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXV.1, 61-83.

Elsner, W., 2005, ‘Real-World Economics Today: The New Complexity, Co-ordination, and Policy’, Review of Social Economy, LXIII.1, 19-53.

Elsner, W., 2009a, ‘The Process and a Simple Logic of “Meso”. Emergence and the Co-Evolution of Institutions and Group Size’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics (forthcoming).

Elsner, W., 2009b, ‘Regional Service Clusters and Networks: Statistical Identification and Empirical Development’, International Review of Applied Economics (forthcoming).

Foley, D.K., 1998, ‘Introduction’, in: D.K. Foley (ed.), P.S. Albin, 1998, Barriers and Bounds to Rationality: Essays on Economic Complexity and Dynamics in Interactive Systems, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Pr., 3-72.

Foray, D., 1998, ‘The Economics of Knowledge Openness: Emergence, Persistence and Change of Conventions in the Knowledge Systems’, in: Trust and Economic Learning, ed. by Lazaric, N., Lorenz, E., Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: E. Elgar. 162-89.

Gallaway, T., Kinnear, D., 2004, ‘Open Source Software, the Wrongs of Copyright, and the Rise of Technology’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXVIII.2, 467-74.

Giussani, B., 2007, ‘A Dutch open-source car’, www.lunchoverip.com/2007/04/a_dutch_opensou.html.

Groenewegen, J., 1996, ‘Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Why and How?’, in: Id., (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1-9.

Groenewegen, J., Vromen, J., 1997, ‘Theory of the Firm Revisited: New and Neo-institutional Perspectives, in: L. Magnusson, J. Ottoson, (eds.), Evolutionary Economics and Path Dependence, Cheltenham, UK, Brookfield, VT, USA: E. Elgar.

Hocker, G., 2008, Market-Hierarchy-Networking: Coordination in Times of Globalization, Fragmentation, and Uncertainty, Frankfurt/M.: P. Lang Publ., Series ‘Structural Change and Structural Policy’, ed. by W. Elsner, Vol. 18.

Hodgson, G.M., 1993, ‘Transaction Costs and the Evolution of the Firm’, in: C. Pitelis, (ed.), Transaction Costs, Markets and Hierarchies, Oxford, UK, Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell, 77-100.

Hodgson, G.M., 1998, ‘Competence and contract in the theory of the firm’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35, 179-201.

Hodgson, G.M., 2005, ‘Knowledge at Work: Some Neoliberal Anachronisms’, Review of Social Economy, LXIII.4, 547-65.

Hodgson, G.M., Knudsen, T., 2000, ‘Capabilities, Learning and the Nature of the Firm: Why Transaction Cost Theory May Provide an Incomplete Explanation’, mimeo., paper presented at the annual conference of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, Berlin.

Honsig, M., 2006, ‚Das offenste aller Autos’ (‚The most open of all cars’), Technology Review 2/2006, www.heise.de/tr/artikel/print/68663.

Jackson, M.O., 2005, ‘A Survey of Network Formation Models: Stability and Efficiency’, in: G. Demange, M. Wooders (eds.), Group Formation in Economics. Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 11-57.

Kay, N.M., 1992, ‘Markets, False, Hierarchies and the Evolution of the Modern Corporation’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17.3, 315-33.

Knoedler, J., 1995, ‘Transaction Cost Theories of Business Enterprise from Williamson and Veblen: Convergence, Divergence, and Some Evidence’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXIX.2, 385-95.

Langlois, R.N., 2003, ‘The vanishing hand: the changing dynamics of industrial capitalism’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12.2, 351-85.

Lerner, J., Tirole, J., 2002, ‘Some simple economics of open source’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50.2, 197-234.

Liebrand, W.B.G., Messick, D.M., (eds.), 1996, Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research. Berlin et al.: Springer.

Lindgren, K., 1997, ‘Evolutionary Dynamics in Game-Theoretic Models’, in: The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, ed. by Arthur, W.B., et al. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 337-67.

Loasby, B.J., 1976, Choice Complexity and Ignorance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Pr.

McKelvey, M., 2001, ‘The Economic Dynamics of Software: Three Competing Business Models Exemplified Through Microsoft, Netscape and Linux’, Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 10, 199-236.

motorauthority, 2008: ‘BMW seeking partners for open-source car software platform’, http://www.motorauthority.com/bmw-seeking-partners-for-open-source-car-platform, website visited Nov. 3, 2008.

Munkirs, J., 1985, The Transformation of American Capitalism, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Neale, W.C., 1994, Art. ‘Institutions’, in: G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels, M.R. Tool (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, Vol. I, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, VT, USA: E. Elgar, 402-6.

Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Change, Cambridge, MA, London, UK: Belknap/Harvard Univ. Pr.

Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., 2002, ‘A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firm’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11.5, 995-1009.

OScar, 2009: www.theoscarproject.org, visited February, 23, 2009.

Penrose, E., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Blackwell.

Perraton, J., 2001, ‘The global economy - myths and realities’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25, 669-84.

Pessali, H.F., Fernández, R.G., 1999, ‘Institutional Economics at the Micro Level? What Transaction Costs Theory Could Learn from Original Institutionalism (In the Spirit of Building Bridges)’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXIII.2, 265-75.

Pitelis, C.N., 1998, ‘Transaction Costs and the Historical Evolution of the Capitalist Firm’, Journal of Economic Issues, XVII.4, 999-1017.

Pohlmann, A., 1993, ‚Stars and Sites’, manager magazin, No. 10, 196-205.

Pratt, A., 1997, ‘The Emerging Shape and Form of Innovation Networks and Institutions’, in: Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions?, ed. by Simmie, J.M., London, Bristol, Penns., US: J. Kingsley Publ., 124-36.

Pratten, S., 1997, ‘The Nature of Transaction Costs Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXI.3, 781-804.

Pyatt, G., 1978, ‘Marginal Costs, Prices, and Storage’, The Economic Journal, 88.352, 749-62.

Raymond, E.S., 1999, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

Ruigrok, W., van Tulder, R., 1995, The Logic of International Restructuring, London, New York: Routledge.

Rycroft, R.W., Kash, D.E., 1999, The Complexity Challenge. Technological Innovation for the 21st Century, London, New York: Pinter.

Schelling, T.C., 1978, Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York, London: W.W. Norton.

Schotter, A., 1981, The economic theory of social institutions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Pr.

Schumpeter, J.A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper&Row.

Simon, H.A., 1957, Administrative Behavior, New York: Macmillan.

Simon, H.A., 1959, ‘Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science’, American Economic Review, 49, 253-83.

Stack, M., Gartland, M.P., 2003, ‘Path Creation, Path Dependency, and Alternative Theories of the Firm’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXVII.2, 487-94.

Tool, M.R., 1985, The Discretionary Economy: A Normative Theory of Political Economy, Boulder, CO: Westview Pr.

Tool, M.R., 1986, Essays in Social Value Theory, Armonk, NY: M.E: Sharpe.

Torvalds, L., 2006, ‘Reclusive Linux founder opens up’, Internet Interview, http://edition.cnn.com/2006/BUSINESS/05/18/global.office.linustorvalds (accessed July 17, 2006).

Van Lange, P.A.M., Liebrand, W.B.G., Messick, D.M., Wilke, H.A.M., 1992, ‘Introduction and Literature Review’, in: W.B.G. Liebrand, D.M. Messick, H.A.M. Wilke (eds.), Social Dilemmas Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Oxford et al., Pergamon Press, 3-28

Veblen, T.B., 1904 (2005), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ., 5th pr.

Watts, D.J., 1999, Small Worlds. The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness, Princeton, NJ, Oxford, UK: Princeton Univ. Pr.

Wendel de Joode, R. v., 2005, Understanding Open Source Communities – An Organizational Perspective, PhD Thesis, TU Delft.

Williamson, O.E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications – A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, New York: Free Pr.

Williamson, O.E., 1981, ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes’, Journal of Economic Literature, 19.4, 1537-68.

Williamson, O.E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Pr.

Williamson, O.E., 1993, ‘The Logic of Economic Organization’, in: O.E. Williamson, S.G. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm. Origins, Evolutions, and Development, New York, Oxford UK: Oxford Univ. Pr., 90-116.

Williamson, O.E., 1995, ‘Hierarchies, Markets and Power in the Economy: An Economic Perspective’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 4.1, 21-49.

Williamson, O.E., 1996, ‘Efficiency, Power, Authority and Economic Organization’, in: J. Groenewegen (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, Boston et al.: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 11-42.

Williamson, O.E., 2003, ‘Examining Economic Organization through the Lens of Contract’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12.4, 917-42.

Winter, S.G., 1993, ‘On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation’, in: O.E. Williamson, S.G. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm. Origins, Evolutions, and Development, New York, Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Pr., 179-95.

Witt, U., 2005, ‘The evolutionary perspective on organizational change and the theory of the firm’, in: K. Dopfer, (ed.), The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Pr.

Wright, P., Mukherji, A., 1999, ‘Inside the firm: Socioeconomic versus agency perspectives on firm competitiveness’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 295-307.