101 proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A survey.

Larch, Martin and Jonung, Lars and Fischer, Jonas (2008): 101 proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A survey. Published in: Public Finance and Management , Vol. 8, No. 3 (2008): pp. 502-560.

Abstract

The failure of key EU Member States to respect the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) a few years after its inception triggered a heated debate on how to reform the framework of fiscal policy coordination in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). This paper analyzes 101 reform proposals presented by professional academic and non-academic economists prior to March 2005, when the Council of the European Union adopted a revised version of the SGP. Roughly four different schools of thought concerning the reform of the SGP are identified. In line with the main findings of the political economy literature, all four schools of thought share the view that in the absence of specific rules fiscal policy would lead to excessive deficits and hence affect the conduct of the common monetary policy. However, beyond this common denominator, there is no consensus on how best to co-ordinate fiscal policy. We present several explanations for the multitude of proposals, the most important being the present lack of a consensus in the economics profession concerning the role of fiscal policy. Economists hold diverging views on the goals, instruments, efficiency and institutions for fiscal policy-making. This state of affairs is in sharp contrast to the case of monetary policy. Also, the euro area is the first case where monetary policy-making is centralized while fiscal policy-making is decentralized to national governments.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Monetary union, euro, fiscal policy, Stability and Growth Pact, international policy coordination, EMU, European nion, Europe
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy ; Stabilization ; Treasury Policy

References

Alesina, A., (2001), ‘The Stability and Growth Pact: Experiences and perspectives’, A comment on Buti in Temi di Finanza Pubblica by A. Monorchio and A.Verde, Cacucci Editore, Bari.

Ardy, B., I. Begg, D. Hodson, I. Maher and D. G. Mayes, (2006), Adjusting to EMU. Basingstoke, Palgrave, Macmillan. Auerbach A., (1994), ‘The U.S. fiscal problem: where we are, how we got here and where we're going’, NBER Working paper series no. 4709.

Bean, C. R., (1992) ‘Economic and monetary union in Europe’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 31-52.

Beetsma, R. and X. Debrun, (2003), ‘Reconciling Stability and Growth: Smart pacts and structural reforms’, IMF Working Paper no. 174.

Blinder, A. S. and R. M. Solow, (1974), ‘Analytical Foundations of Fiscal Policy’ in: A. S. Blinder, R. M. Solow, G.F. Break, P.O. Steiner and D. Netzer (eds), The Economics of Public Finances, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.

Bofinger, P., (2003), ‘Why the Stability and Growth Pact provides neither stability nor growth?’, Universität Würzburg, mimeo.

Bordo, M. and L. Jonung, (2003), ‘The future of EMU: What does the history of monetary unions tell us?’, chapter 3 in F. Capie and G. Wood (eds), Monetary Unions. Theory, History, Public Choice, Routledge, London.

Briotti G., (2005), ‘Economic reactions to public finance consolidation: A survey of the literature’, European Central Bank, Occasional paper series no.38.

Brunila A., M. Buti, and J. in ’t Veld (2003), ‘Cyclical stabilisation in Europe: How effective are automatic stabilisers?’, Empirica , vol. 30, pp. 1-24.

Buiter, W., G. Corsetti and N. Rubini, (1993), ‘Maastricht fiscal rules’, Economic Policy, 16, pp. 57-100.

Cabral, A.J. (2001), ‘Main aspects of the working of the SGP’, in A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.), The Stability and Growth Pact; The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp. 139-157.

Calmfors, L., (2003), ‘Fiscal policy to stabilise the domestic economy in the EMU: What can we learn from monetary policy?’, CESifo Economic Studies, vol. 49, no. 3.

Calmfors, L. and G. Corsetti, (2004), ‘How to reform Europe's policy framework’, World Economics, vol. 4, no. 1 Casella, A., (1999), ‘Tradable deficit permits’, Economic Policy, vol. 14, no. 29.

Costello, D., (2001), ‘The SGP: How did we get there?’, in A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.), The Stability and Growth Pact; The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp. 106-136.

De Grauwe, P. and W. Vanhaverbeke (1991), ‘Is Europe an optimum currency area? Evidence from regional data’, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 555.

De Mello L., P.M. Kongsrud and R. Price, (2004), ‘Saving behaviour and the effectiveness of fiscal policy’, Economics department, OECD, Working paper no. 397. Eichengreen, B., (1991), ‘Is Europe an optimum currency area?’, NBER Working Paper No. 3579.

Eichengreen, B., (2003), ‘Institutions for Fiscal Stability’, University of California, Berkeley mimeo.

European Commission, (2000), Public Finances in EMU 2000, European Economy no. 3, Brussels.

European Commission, (2004), Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Strengthening economic governance and clarifying the implementation of the SGP’, COM (2004) 581 final, 3 September 2004.

European Commission, (2005), Public Finances in EMU 2005, European Economy no. 3, Brussels.

Fatás A. and I. Mihov, (2002), ‘The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion’, Discussion paper series, no. 3277.

Fatás, A., J. von Hagen, A.H. Hallett, H. Siebert and R. Strauch, (2003), ‘Stability and Growth in Europe: Towards a Better Pact’, CEPR Report.

Fitoussi, J-P., (2002), ‘The Stability (and Growth) Pact and Monetary Policy’, Committee for Economic and Monetary Affairs, Briefing Paper no. 4

Friedman, M., (1968), ‘The role of monetary policy’, American Economic Review.

Gros, D. and A. Hobza, (2001), ‘Fiscal policy spillovers in the euro area. Where are they?’, Working document no 176, CEPS, Brussels.

Hemming R., M. Kell and S. Mahfouz, (2002), ‘The effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating economic activity – A review of the literature’, International Monetary Fund, WP/02/208.

Hicks, J., (1967), ‘Monetary policy and history – An attempt at perspective’, chapter 9 in J. Hicks, Critical Essays in Monetary Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Hodson, D., (2005), ‘Economic governance and the dual outcome in euro area fiscal policy, 1999-2002’, Ph. D. Dissertation, LSE.

Kydland, F.E. and E. Prescott, (1977), ‘Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans’, Journal of Political Economy, vol 85, pp. 473-92.

Mathieu, C. and H. Sterdyniak, (2003), ‘Reforming the SGP: Breaking the ice’, OFCE working paper no. 2003-02.

Orphanides, A., (2000), ‘The quest for prosperity without inflation’, European Central BankW orking paper no.15.

Orphanides A. and J. C. Williams, (2005), ‘The decline of activist stabilization policy: Natural rate misperceptions, learning, and expectations’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 29, pp. 1927-1950.

Pisani-Ferry, J., (2002), ‘Fiscal Discipline and Policy Coordination in the Eurozone: Assessment and Proposals’, in Ministerie van Financiën, Budgetary Policy in E(M)U: Design and Challenge, The Hague.

Silgoner M. A., G. Reitschuler and J. Crespo-Cuaresma (2003), ‘The fiscal smile: the effectiveness and limits of fiscal stabilizers’, International Monetary Fund, WP/03/182. Tanzi, V., (2004), ‘The Stability and Growth Pact. Its role and future’, Cato Journal, vol.24,no.1-2.

Uhlig, H., (2002), ‘One money, but many fiscal policies in Europe: What are the consequences?’, CEPR Discussion paper series no.3296.

von Hagen, J., (2002), ‘More growth for stability. Reflections on fiscal policy in Euroland’, ZEI University of Bonn, mimeo.

Wyplosz, C., (2002), ‘Fiscal Policy: Institutions vs. Rules’, Paper prepared for the Swedish Government's Committee on Stabilisation Policy in the EMU.

Wyplosz, C., (2005), ‘Fiscal policy: Institutions versus rules’, National Institute Economic Review, no 191, pp. 64-78.