Average tax rate cyclicality in OECD countries: A test of three fiscal policy theories

Furceri, Davide and Karras, Georgios (2010): Average tax rate cyclicality in OECD countries: A test of three fiscal policy theories.

Abstract

This paper investigates the cyclical properties of the average effective tax rate in 26 OECD countries over 1965-2003 in order to test the validity of three theories of fiscal policy: (i) the standard Keynesian theory which recommends that tax policy should be counter-cyclical, (ii) the Tax Smoothing hypothesis, which implies that changes in GDP should be uncorrelated with tax rates, and (iii) the positive theory of Battaglini and Coate (2008) which predicts that the average tax rate should be negatively correlated with GDP. Our main finding is that the correlations of tax rates with cyclical GDP are generally quite small and statistically indistinguishable from zero. This finding is quite robust and is more consistent with the implications of the Tax Smoothing hypothesis than either the recommendations of the standard Keynesian model or the predictions of Battaglini and Coate’s theory.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fiscal Policy; Tax Rates; Business Cycle
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles

References

Alesina, A., Campante, F. and Tabellini, G. (2008) “Why is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclcial?”, Journal of the European Economics Association, 6(5), forthcoming

Alesina, A., Wacziarg, R., (1998). “Openness, country size and government” 69(3), Journal of Public Economics, pp. 305-321.

Barro, R.J.(1979 “On the Determination of the Public Debt,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, 940-971.

Battaglini, M. and Coate, S. (2008) “Fiscal Policy over the Business Cycle: A Positive Theory” NBER Working Paper 14047.

Beffy, P.O., P. Ollivaud, P. Richardson and F. Sédillot (2006), “New OECD Methods for Supply-Side and Medium-Term Assessments: A Capital Services Approach”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 482.

Catao, L., and Sutton, B. (2002). “Sovereign defaults: the role of volatility”, International Monetary Fund, Working Paper 02/149.

Gavin M. and Perotti R. (1997). "Fiscal policy in Latin America", NBER Macroeconomics Annual, vol. 12, 11-71.

Hallerberg, M. and Strauch, R. (2002). “On the Cyclicality of Fiscal Policy in Europe”. Empirica. 29: 183-207.

Ilzetzki, E. and Végh, C. (2008). “Procyclical Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries: Truth or Fiction?” NBER Working Paper 14191. Cambridge, United States: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kaminsky, G., Reinhart, C. and Végh, C. (2004). “When It Rains, It Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies.” NBER Working Paper 10780. Cambridge, United States: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Lane, P. (2003). ”The cyclical behaviour of fiscal policy: evidence from the OECD”, Journal of Public Economics, vol.87, 12, 2261-2675 (December).

Persson, T. (2001). “Do Political Institutions Shape Economic Policy?”, NBER Working Papers 8214.

Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2001). “Political Institutions and Policy Outcomes: What are the Stylized Facts ? ”, CEPR Discussion Papers 2872.

Romer, David (2006). Advanced Macroeconomics, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill.

Sorensen, B., Wu, L. and Yosha, O. (2001). “Output fluctuations and fiscal policy: U.S. state and local governments 1978–1994’”, European Economic Review, vol. 45, pp. 1271–310.

Talvi E. and Vegh, C. (2005). “Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy”, Journal of Economic Development, 78 (1), 156-190.