Meritocratic Aspects Concerning Civil Servant Career. Comparative Study In Central and Eastern European Countries

Matei, Ani and Popa, Florin (2010): Meritocratic Aspects Concerning Civil Servant Career. Comparative Study In Central and Eastern European Countries.

Abstract

Central and Eastern Europe has known in the last 20 years profound changes. The shift from a dictatorial system to a democratic system forced the states from this area to adopt structural measures for all public institutions. In this context, the institution of “civil servant” could not remain unaffected. In the period of communist regimes, the institution of “civil servant” did not exist, the civil servant being just a simple employee of the state. Work relations were the same as for any employee. The shift to another political system, the democratic one, determined the reconsideration the role and the place of public administration, and implicit of civil servant in the framework of the state system. In this context, it has been a shift from the statute of simple employee to that of civil servant, representing the power of the state. In the process of accession to the European Union, the states from Central and Eastern Europe have been permanently pressured to clearly define a strategy concerning the competitiveness of public administration, concerning the statute and the career of civil servant. In the context of democratisation, we can notice that the principle of meritocracy has become a key principle in the civil servant’s career. The term “meritocracy” is often used in order to describe a type of society in which wealth and social position are obtained mainly through competition or through ability or proved competences. A position invested with responsibilities and social prestige has to be acquired and not inherited or obtained by arbitrary criteria. Meritocracy represents also the term used to describe or to criticise a society in competition that accepts inequitable disparities of income, wealth and social position. Taking into account the above considerations, the present paper aims to achieve an analysis of meritocratic aspects in the systems of planning and promotion of civil servant’s career in Central and Eastern Europe

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Meritocracy, IQ, Civil service, Central and Eastern States, Weberiannes Scale, Empirical Studies
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption; H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H83 - Public Administration ; Public Sector Accounting and Audits

References

Agh, A., 2003, „Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe”, in Peters, B., G., and Pierre, J., (eds.) 2003, „Handbook of Public Administration”, Sage Publication, London, Thousand, Oaks, New Delhi;

Davis, J., 2006, „Meritocracy in the Civil Service, 1853-1970”, the Political Quarterly, vol. 77, Issue S1, pp 27-35;

De Sario, N., J., 2003, „Reconceptualizing Meritocracy: The Decline of Disparate Impact Discrimination Law”, Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 38, pp. 479-510;

Demmke, Ch., 2004, „European Civil Services between Tradition and Reform”, EIPA, Maastricht;

Dench, G., 2006, „Introduction: Reviewing Meritocracy”, The Political Quarterly, vol. 77, Issue, pp 1-14;

Evans, Peter, and James Rauch. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 64(5): 748–65., Oct. 1999; pp. 748-765;

Fisher, C., S., Hout, M., Jankowski, M., S., Lucas, S., R., Swidler, A., Voss, K., 1996, „Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey;

Flynn, J., R., 2007, „What is Intelligence? Beyond the Flynn Effect”, Cambridge University Press;

Goetz, K., H., 2001, „Making sense of post-communist central administration: modernization, Europeanization or Latinization?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 8:6, December; 1032-1051;

Gottfredson, L., S., 1997, „Mainstream Science on Intelligence: An Editorial With 52 Signatories, History, and Bibliography”, Intelligence, No. 24(1), pp 13-23;

Horovitz, I., L., 2006, „The Moral Economy of Meritocracy: or, the Unanticipated Triumph of Reform and the Failure of Revolution in the West”, The Political Quarterly, vol. 77, Issue S1, pp. 127-133;

Iorgovan, A., 2001, „Tratat de drept administrativ”, vol. I, fourth edition, Ed. All Beck, Bucharest;

Young, M., D., 1958, „The Rise of the Meritocracy”, Thames and Hudson, London;

Krauze, T., Slomczynski, M., K., 1985, „How far to meritocracy? Empirical tests of a controversial thesis”, Social Focus, USA, vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 623-642;

Matei A., Matei L., 2008, „Statistic Instruments for Performance Evaluation in the Public Sector. A Case Study for Romania”, International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, vol. 5, No. 1., pp. 35-52, Springer;

Matei L., 2007, „A New Concept for Training Leaders, Applied in the Romanian Administrative Area: Public Manager”, The Third Transatlantic Dialogue: „Leading the Future of the Public Sector”, Delaware, USA, Available at SSRN: http//ssrn.com/abstract=1372143;

Matei L., 2009, „Romanian Public Management Reform. Theoretical and Empirical Studies. Civil Service”, vol. II, Bucharest, Ed. Economica;

Matei, L., and Matei, A., 2007, „Meritocratic Aspects Concerning Performance Evaluation in the Public Sector – A Case Study for Romania”. EGPA Annual Conference. Madrid. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1313085 ;

Matei, L., Lazar, C., G., 2009, „Development and Regulation of Civil Service in Central and Eastern European States – A Comparative Analisis in View of Goad Governance”, IIAS Conference, Helsonki, Avilable at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440099 ;

McNamee, St. J., Miller, R., K., Jr., 2004, „The Meritocracy Myth”, Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield, c2004

Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., 2008, „Variaties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe”, EVI Working Paper MWP no. 2008/39;

Negulescu, P., 1932, „Tratat de drept administrativ”, vol I, Principii generale, fourth edition, Institutul de arte grafice „E. Marvan”, Bucharest;

Peters, G., B., Pierre, J., 2007, „The Handbook of Public Administration”, Sage Publication, London, New Delhi, Singapore;

Stern, W., 1912, „The Psychological Methods of Intelligence Testing”, (G. Whipple, Trans.), Warwich and York, Baltinese;

Verheijen, T., 2001, „Politico-Administrative Relations: Who Rules?”, Bratislava, NISPAcee;

Verheigen, A., J., G., 2007, „Public Administration in Post-Communist Streets” in Peters, B., G., and Pierre, J., (eds.), 2007, „The Handbook of Public Administration”, Sage Publications, London, New Delhi, Singapore, pp. 311-320;

Weber, M., 1968, „Economy and Society”, Edited by Guenter Roth and Clauss Witlrich, New York: Bedminster;

Weber, M., 1947, „The Theory of Social and Economic Organization” (Translated by Hendesson, A.M., and Passons, T.), The Free Press, New York;

Werheijen, T., 1999, „Conclusions”, in Verheijen, T., (ed.), „Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe”, Edward Elgar, Cheltesiham, pp. 327-38;

Willetts, D., 2006, „The Future of Meritocracy”, The Political Quarterly, vol. 77, pp 237-243;

Wolman, B., B., 1985, „Handbook of Intelligence: Theories, measurements and application” Wiley, New York