Construction of abatement cost curves: The case of F-gases

Halkos, George (2010): Construction of abatement cost curves: The case of F-gases.

Abstract

Most of scientific research on Greenhouse Gases (GHG) focuses on CO2 emissions. But non-CO2 gases (mainly F-gases in the form of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) are more potent at trapping heat within the atmosphere. Currently, F-gases constitute a small proportion of GHG emissions but they are extremely high Global Warming Potential gases. At the same time, they are expected to increase massively due to the expansion of some emitting industries, while the atmospheric lifetimes of PFCs and SF6 are very long. This study analyzes the economic and technical assumptions in abatement cost calculation in the case of the F-gases. The important factors for differences among countries in average mitigation costs are discussed and the least cost curve of F-gases control for the EU-27 and for the year 2020 is derived. It seems that it is more cost-effective to start abating SF6 first, and then moving to PFCs and then applying control methods to HFCs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: F-gases; control methods; emissions; GWP
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L95 - Gas Utilities ; Pipelines ; Water Utilities; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development

References

Blok, K., De Jager, D., Hendriks, C. (2001). Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change—Summary Report for Policy Makers. Ecofys, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Chesnaye F., Harvey R., Kruger D. and Laitner J. (2001). Cost-effective reductions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. Energy Policy, 29, 1325-1331.

den Elzen, M. (2005). Abatement cost of post–Kyoto Climate regimes, Energy Policy, 33 (16), 2138-2151.

Devotta S., Asthana S., Joshi R., (2004). Challenges in recovery and recycling of refrigerants from Indian refrigeration and air-conditioning service sector, Atmospheric Environment, 38, 845-854.

ESIA (2006). European Semiconductor Industry Association: Intermediate Staus Report of the Progress towards the reduction of PFC emissions from European semiconductor manufacturing. Brussels.

Eurostat, (2006) Eurostat: Passenger transport in the European Union - Issue number 9/2006, Luxembourg, September 2006. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_ OFFPUB/KS-NZ-06-009/EN/KS-NZ-06-009-EN.PDF. Accessed 11 July 2008

Fuglestvedt J., Berntsen T., Godal O., Sausen R., Shine K. and Skodvin T. (2003). Metrics of climate change: Assessing radiative forcing and emission indices, Climatic Change, 58, 267-331.

Greenpeace. (2003). Freezing and air conditioning without global warming. Greenpeace, Athens.

Gallaher, M.P., Petrusa, J.E., Delhotal, K.C., (2005). International marginal abatement costs of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. Environmental Science, 2(2/3), 327–337.

Halkos, G. (1992). Economic Perspectives of the Acid Rain Problem in Europe, DPhil thesis, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York..

Halkos. G. (1995). Evaluation of the direct cost of sulphur abatement under the main desulfurization technologies, Energy Sources, 17, 391-412.

Harmelink, M.G.M., Blok, K., Ter Avest, G.H. (2005). Evaluation of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emission reductions in The Netherlands in the period 1990–2003, Environmental Science, 2(2/3), 339–349.

Harnisch, J., Hendriks, C. (2000). Economic Evaluation of Emission Reductions of HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in Europe. Special report: Contribution to the study ‘‘Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change’’ on behalf of the Commission of the European Union, Directorate General Environment, ECOFYS Energy and Environment, Cologne, Germany.

Harnisch, J., Gluckman, R. (2001). Final Report on the European Climate Change Programme Working Group Industry Work Item Fluorinated Gases. Prepared on behalf of the European Commission (DG ENV and DG ENTR), Ecofys/Enviros, Germany.

Harnisch, J. and Schwarz, W. (2003). Costs and the impact on emissions of potential regulatory framework for reducing emissions of hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride (B4-3040/2002/336380/MAR/E1), Final Report, Ecofys and Oko-Recherche, Utrecht..

Harnisch J., Hohne N., Koch M., Wartmann S., Schwarz W., Jenseit W., Rheinberger., Fabian P. and Jordan A. (2004). Risks and benefits of fluorinated greenhouse gases in techniques and products under special consideration of the properties intrinsic to the substance. Reasearch Report 201 64 315 UBA-FB 000673/E. Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin.

Heijnes, H., Van Brummelen, M., Blok, K. (1999). Reduction of the emissions of HFC’s, PFC’s and SF6 in the European Union. Final report. Ecofys, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Hourcade, J.-C. and Shukla, P. (co-ordinating lead authors) et al., (2001). ‘Global, Regional, and National Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation’, in IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 499–559.

Houghton, T., L.G. Meira Filho, B. Lim, K. Tréanton, I. Mamaty, Y. Bonduki, D.J. Griggs and B.A. Callander (eds.). (1997). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 3. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual, Paris, IPCC/OECD/IEA.

Hyman, R.C., Reilly, J.M., Babiker, M.H., De Masin, A., Jacoby, H.D. (2002). Modeling non-CO2 greenhouse gas abatement, Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 8(3), 175–186.

IIASA (2008). Emission scenarios for non-CO2 greenhouse gases in the EU 27: Mitigation potentials and costs in 2020. International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Austria.

IPCC (1990). Climate change. The IPCC scientific assessment; intergovernmental panel of climate change, World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environmental Programme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

IPCC (1996). Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B.A. Callender, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

IPCC/TEAP (2005) IPCC/TEAP: Special Report on Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons. Prepared by Working Group I and III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the Technology and Assessment Panel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2005.

Irving, W.N., Branscombe, M. (2002). HFC-23 emissions from HCFC-22 production, Background Papers IPCC Expert Meetings on Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, TSU, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan, pp. 271–283.

Klimont Z., Cofala J., Berto I., Amann M., Heyes C., Gyarfas F. (2002). Modelling Particulate Emissions in Europe, IR-02-076, IIASA, Laxenburg.

Jensen, J., Thelle, M.H. (2001). What are the gains from a multi-gas strategy?, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano, Italy.

Jyrkkonen M. (2004). Suora kaytto kuljetusjaahdytyksessa (Direct use in refrigerated transport), presentation in seminar: Hiilidioksidi jaahdytyslaitoksissa (CO2 in refrigeration units), 10.2.2004, Helsinki, Finland.

Kaapola, E. (1989). Pienkylmalaitoksen kayttajaopas (Guide for using refrigerator devices). Kylmatuki, Helsinki. (in Finnish).

Klein Goldewijk, K., Olivier, J.G.J., Peters, J.A.H.W., Coenen, P.W.H.W., Vreuls, H.H.J. (2005). Greenhouse Gas Emissions in The Netherlands 1990–2003, National Inventory Report 2005. Report no. 773201009. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Lucas, P.L., Den Elzen, M.G.J., Van Vuuren, D.P. (2005). Multi-gas abatement analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. Report no. 550006001. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Manne, A.S., Richels, R.G., (2001). An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gasses, Nature, 5, 675–677.

Morita, T., Robinson, J., Adegbulugbe, A., Alcamo, J., Herbert, D., Lebre la Rovere, E., Nakicenivic, N., Pitcher, H., Raskin, P., Riahi, K., Sankovski, A., Solkolov, V., de Vries, H.J.M., Zhou, D. (2001). Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and implications. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., Pan, J. (Eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Oinonen T. and Soimakallio S. (2001). HFC- ja PFC- yhdisteiden sekä SF6:n päästöjen tekniset vähentämiskeinot ja niiden kustannukset Suomessa (HFC and PFC compounds and SF6 emission reduction options and costs in Finland), VTT tiedotteita 2099 (in Finnish).

Pedersen P. (1998). Substitutes for Potent Greenhouse Gases (HFCs, PFCs and SF6), Danish Technological Institute, Denmark

Reilly, J., Prinn, R., Harnisch, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Jacoby, H., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Stone, P., Sokolov, A., Wang, C. (1999). Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature, 549-555.

Reilly, J., Mayer, M., Harnisch, J. (2000). Multi gas control under the Kyoto Agreement. Report No. 58, Camebridge, MA.

Reilly, Jacoby, H., Prinn, R. (2003). Multi-gas contributors to global climate change: Climate impacts and mitigation costs of non-CO2 gases. Pew Centre for Climate Change, Arlington VA.

Reilly J., Sarofim M.., Paltsev S. and Prinn R. (2006). The role of non-CO2 GHGs in climate policy: Analysing using the MIT IGSM, Energy Journal Special Issue, 503-520.

Rhiemeier JM and Harnisch J. (2009). F-gases (HFCs, PFCs and SF6): Sectoral emission reduction and Economic Costs for Climate Change (SERPEC-CC). ECOFYS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Rose S., Ahammad H., Eickhout ., Fisher B., Kurosawa A., Rao S., Riahi K. and van Vuuren D. (2008). Land in climate stabilization modeling: Initial observations. EMF Report 21. Energy Modeling Forum. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4026.

Schaefer, O.D., Godwin, D. and Harnisch J. (2006). Estimating Future Emissions and Potential Reductions of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. Energy Journal Multi-Greenhouse Mitigation and Climate Policy Special Issue, 63-88.

Schwarz, W., Leisewitz, A. (1999). Emissions and Reduction Potentials of Hydrofluorocarbons, Perfluorocarbons and Sulphur Hexafluoride in Germany. UBA-FB, O¨ ko-Recherche, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Schwarz, W., Rhiemeier, J.-M. (2007). The analysis of the emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases from refrigeration and air conditioning equipment used in the transport sector other than road transport and options for reducing these emissions, prepared for the European Commission (DG Environment), 2 November 2007.

Tohka, A., (2005). The GAINS Model for Greenhouse Gases - Version 1.0: HFC, PFC and SF6. IIASA Interim Report IR-05-056, IIASA, Laxenburg.

UNEP (2006) Report of the Refrigeration, Air conditioning, and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee, 2006 Assessment, Nairobi, January 2007.

USEPA (2001) US High GWP gas emissions 1990-2010: Inventories, projections and opportunities for reductions June 2001. USEPA EPA 000-F-97-000, Washington.

USEPA (2006a). Global Mitigation of Non- CO2 Greenhouse Gases, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA Report 430-R-06-005, http://www.epa.gov/nonco2/econ-inv/international.html

USEPA (2006b). Global Emissions of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: 1990-2020. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), Washington, D.C., EPA Report 430-R-06-003, http://www.epa.gov/nonco2/econ-inv/international.html

Van Vuuren, D.P., Den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M., Lucas, P.L., Eickhout, B., Eerens, H., Oostenrijk, R. (2003). Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes: comparison of variants of the multi-stage and per capita convergence regimes. Report no. 728001025. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Van Vuuren, D.P., Weyant, J.P., De la Chesnaye, F.C. (2006). Multigas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing, Energy Econ, 28, 102–120.

Weyant, J.P., De la Chesnaye, F.C. (2006). Overview of EMF-21: multigas mitigation and climate change. Energy Journal Multi-Greenhouse Mitigation and Climate Policy Special Issue, 1-32.