Prohibition of parallel Imports as a hard core Restriction of Article 4 of Block Exception Regulation for vertical Agreements: European Law and Economics

Zevgolis, Nikolaos and Fotis, Panagiotis (2011): Prohibition of parallel Imports as a hard core Restriction of Article 4 of Block Exception Regulation for vertical Agreements: European Law and Economics.

Abstract

This paper attempts, on the one hand, to reveal the main principles of Competition Law (regulatory and case law framework) covering the prevention of parallel trade, mainly the prohibition of parallel imports or exports, and on the other hand to cast light on the main effects of parallel imports prohibition imposed by an upstream supplier on the competitive structure of the downstream market. Especially, the regulatory framework relates Block Exception Regulation 330/2010, (ex Block Exception Regulation 2790/99), with Block Exception Regulation 461/2010 (ex Block Exception Regulation 1400/2002) in order to determine whether prohibition of parallel trade constitutes a hardcore restriction or not, while the economic analysis evaluates it in a geographical vertical market which constitutes an upstream and a downstream market with few suppliers & buyers respectively which sell goods to the final (domestic) consumers. The results indicate that prohibition of parallel imports by the upstream sellers causes vertical restraints to the domestic customers of the buyers.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Antitrust Law; Vertical Restraints; Block Exception Regulation; Market Imperfection; Consumer Nondurables; Repeated Games of Oligopoly Theory
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games ; Evolutionary Games ; Repeated Games

References

Acutt, M., Elliott, C., (2001). Threat-Based Competition Policy. European Journal of Law and Competition, 11(3), 309-317.

Bellamy, C., Child, G. (2001). European Community Law of Competition. Sweet & Maxwell, 5th ed..

Case T-450/05, Peugeot/Commission, [2009], available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005TJ0450:EN:HTML.

Case C-551/03 P, General Motors, [2006] ECR I-3173, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62003J0551:EN:HTML.

Case C-338/00 P, Volkswagen/Commission, [2003] ECR I-9189, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62000J0338:EN:HTML.

Case No IV/M.1612, WAL-MART/ASDA, [1999], available at http://ec.europa.eu/-competition/¬mergers/cases/decisions/m1612_en.pdf.

Cases 25 and 26/84 Ford-Werke AG and Ford of Europe Inc. v Commission, [1985] ECR 2725, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=-CELEX:¬61984J0025¬:EN:HTML.

Case 319/82 Société de vente de ciments et bétons de l’Est [1983] ECR 4173, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=-CELEX:61982J0319:¬EN:¬HTML¬

Cases 96-102, 104, 105, 108 and 110/82, NV IAZ International Belgium and others v Commission of the European Communities, [1983] ECR 3369, [1984] 3 CMLR 276, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:-61982¬J0096¬:¬EN:¬HTML.

Clark, J., Simon, S., (2010). The New Legal Framework for Motor Vehicle Distribution: A Toolkit to Deal with Real Competition Breakdowns. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 1-13.

COM(2009) 388, COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION, The Future Competition Law Framework applicable to the motor vehicle sector, {SEC(2009) 1052}, {SEC(2009) 1053}, Brussels, 22.7.2009 [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0388:FIN:EN:PDF].

Commission Decision 2006/431/EC of 5 October 2005 in Cases F-2/36.623/36.820/37.275 — SEP et autres/Peugeot SA [available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/36820/36820_191_1.pdf].

Commission Decision 2002/758/EC of 10 October 2001 in Case COMP/36.264 — Mercedes-Benz [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬OJ:¬L:2002:257:0001:0047:EN:PDF].

Commission Decision 2001/146/EC of 20 September 2000 in Case COMP/36.653 — Opel [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:¬059:¬¬0001¬¬:0042:EN:PDF].

Commission Decision 98/273/EC of 28 January 1998 in Case IV/35.733 — VW [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:l:1998:124:-0060:0108¬:en:PDF].

Dethmers, F., & Pier Posthuma de Boer, P., (2009). Ten years on: Vertical Agreements under article 81. European Competition Law Review, 30(9), 424-439.

Fotis P., Polemis M., (2011). The use of Economic Tools in Merger Analysis: Lessons from US & EU experience. European Competition Journal, (forthcoming).

Fotis, P., Polemis, M., Zevgolis, N., (2011). Robust Event Studies from Derogation from Suspension of Concentrations in Greece during the Period 1995 – 2008. Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, 11, 67-89.

Fotis, P., Polemis, M., Zevgolis, N., (2009). Stock price performance as an argument for derogation from suspension of concentrations: Reality or a myth?. European Competition Law Review, 30(5), 216-222.

Goyder, D.G. (2004). EC Competition Law. Oxford University Press, 4th ed..

Karydis, G., Zevgolis, N., (2009). Regulation 1400/2002 and access to technical information: Necessity of convergent interpretation with the principles established by the relevant case law. European Competition Law Review, 30(2), 95-101.

V. Korah, V., O’Sullivan, D. (2002). Distribution Agreements under the EC Competition Rules. Hart Publishing.

Motta, M. (2009). Competition Policy Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Overvest, M. B., (2010) A note on collusion and resale price maintenance. European Journal of Law and Competition, doi: 10.1007/s1065701091480.

O.J. L 123C/52, 28.05.2010, COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 461/2010, of 27 May 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=¬OJ:L:2010:129:0052:0057¬:EN:¬PDF].

O.J. C130/01, 19.05.2010, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Guidelines on Vertical Restraints [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:¬2010:¬130¬:0001:0046:EN:PDF].

O.J. L102/1, 23.4.2010, COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 330/2010, of 20 April 2010, on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:102:0001:¬0007:EN:¬PDF].

O.J. L 203/30, 1.8.2002, COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1400/2002, of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:l:2002:203:0030:0041:en:PDF].

O.J. L336/21, 29.12.1999, COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2790/1999, of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices [available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/¬LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:l:1999:336:0021:0025:en:PDF] .

Simon, S., (2010). Die neue Kfz-GVO 461/2010, ÖZK (Österreichische Zeitschrift Fur Kartellrecht). Austrian Competition Journal, 3, 83-91.

Tirole, J. (1998). The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge. Vezzoso, S., (2004). On the Antitrust Remedies to Promote Retail Innovation in the EU Car Sector. European Competition Law Review, 25(4), 190-204.

Zevgolis, N., Fotis, P., (2009). Prohibition of parallel imports and application of Regulation on vertical agreements in the sector of detergents for domestic use. Business and Company Law, 11, 1184-1190 (in Greek).