Productivity Growth in Small Enterprises - Role of Inputs, Technological Progress and 'Learning By Doing'

Majumder, Rajarshi (2004): Productivity Growth in Small Enterprises - Role of Inputs, Technological Progress and 'Learning By Doing'. Published in: Indian Journal of Labour Economics , Vol. 47, No. 4 (December 2004)

Abstract

Small Manufacturing Enterprises (SMEs) in an overpopulated developing economy serve the dual role of job-creation and shifting the occupational structure. However, their contribution to the overall health of the economy are being questioned on grounds of low productivity and economic viability. Sustainability of SMEs is argued to depend on improving labour productivity (LP) through technological upgradation. In a developing economy this may be a costly proposition due to capital scarcity. So, the effect of technological changes on productivity levels has to be estimated before taking such policies. This effect is generally measured by Total Factor Productivity Growth (TFPG) which is also a measure of Technological Progress (TP). A positive TFPG implies outward expansion of the production frontier leading to more than proportionate output growth compared to input growth whereby it may be concluded that TP is leading to productivity rise. However, TFPG in the growth accounting approach is a residual measure and encompasses the effect of not only TP, but is a combination of improved technology and the skill with which known technology is applied, i.e. Technological Diffusion or Technological Efficiency (TE). The SMEs rely on indigenous resources, adaptive technology, 'on-job' skill acquisition, and, go on experimenting till they achieve the optimum mix of technology, resource, skill and organisation. Consequently, technological diffusion is more important to them rather than the 'modernity' of the technology itself. This paper seeks to disassociate the effects of pure TP from those of TEC in few selected industries within the SMEs to examine the relative importance of them in improving the health of the SMEs. We use the NSSO database on Unorganised Manufacturing sector. The reference periods are 1994-95 and 2000-01, as defined by the two latest NSSO surveys and concentrate on Food product, Textiles, Leather product, and Non-electrical & electrical equipment sectors. Mean contribution of input growth is found to be 3.17 percent p.a. while that of TFPG has been only 1.10 percent p.a. Contribution of input growth is higher than TFPG in majority of cases, indicating that major part of VAG has been possible because of increased input use and technological upgradation has had only a moderate effect. It is observed that Efficiency levels have improved in 65 percent of cases while TP has been positive in just 35 percent cases. The quantum of TEC has been higher than TP in more number of cases. In about 70 per cent of the situations where indeed there has been some technological improvement, technological diffusion has by far outstripped the role of pure technical progress. For Food product and Equipment sectors, both TP and TEC are observed to be equally important in determining TFPG. While TP plays a dominant role in the Textiles sector, TEC plays a more vital role in the Leather products sector.This underlines the importance of diffusion for improving the conditions of the SMEs and as a policy choice, Efficiency Upgradation appears more viable, effective and lucrative compared to Technological Upgradation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Dept of Economics, University of Burdwan
• Language: English
• Keywords: Productivity; Small Manufacturing Enterprises; Technological Progress; Total Factor Productivity; Frontier Production Function
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General

References

Ahluwalia, I.J (1991) – ‘Productivity and Growth in Indian Manufacturing’, Oxford University Press, New Delhi Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt (1977) - “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 6. Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli (1992) - “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3. Bauer, P.W. (1990) - “Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 46. Bhalla, Sheila (2000) – “Behind Poverty: The Qualitative Deterioration of Employment Prospects for Rural Indians”, Paper presented at the National Seminar on ‘Employment Generation in India,’ Department of Labour and Employment, Govt. of India, Gandhinagar, February 2000. Chenery, H., S. Robinson, and M. Syrquin (1986) – ‘Industrialisation and Growth: A Comparative Study’, Oxford University Press, New York Forsund, F.R., C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt (1980) - “A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and of their Relationship to Efficiency Measurement”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 13. Ghate, Prabhu et al (1992) – ‘Informal Finance: Some Findings from Asia’, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong Greene, W.H. (1993) - “The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis”, in Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K. and Schmidt, S.S. (eds.), ‘The Measurement of Productive Efficiency’, Oxford University Press, New York. Kalirajan, K.P., M.B. Obwona and S. Zhao (1996) - “A Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth: The Case of Chinese Agricultural Growth Before and After Reforms”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 78. Mamgain, R.P. and I.C. Awasthi (2001) – “Technology and Training for Informal Sector: Need for New Initiatives” in Amitabh Kundu and Alakh N. Sharma (eds.) ‘Informal Sector in India – Perspectives and Policies’, Institute for Human Development, New Delhi. Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck (1977) - “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb- Douglas Production Functions With Composed Error”, International Economic Review, Vol. 18. Mukherjee, Dipa and Ashok Mathur (2002) – “Technological Upgradation in the Informal Manufacturing Sector: Possibilities and Problems”, Paper presented at the National Seminar on ‘Making Informal Sector Viable and Growth Oriented’ at Sardar Patel Institute of Economic and Social Research, Ahmedabad September, 2002 NSSO (1998) - Basic and Multiplier Data on Survey of Unorganised Manufacture: Non directory Establishments and Own Account Enterprises, NSS 51st Round (July 1994-June 1995) on CD-ROM (CD 699 & 700) from NSSO, Government of India, New Delhi. ______ (1998a) - Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India: Its Size Employment and Some Key Estimates, NSS 51st Round (July 1994-June 1995) NSS Report no: 433, NSSO, August, 1998, Government of India, New Delhi. ______ (2002) - Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India 2000-2001 - Key Results, NSS 56th Round (July 2000-June 2001) NSS Report no: 477, NSSO, November, 2002, Government of India, New Delhi. ______ (2002a) - Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India 2000-2001 - Input, Output and Value Added, NSS 56th Round (July 2000-June 2001) NSS Report no: 480, NSSO, November, 2002, Government of India, New Delhi. Oberai, A.S. and G.K. Chadha (2001) - "Job Creation in Urban Informal Sector in India: Some Macro-Economic Policy Issues” in A.S. Oberai and G.K. Chadha (eds.) ‘Job Creation in Urban Informal Sector in India: Issues and Policy Options’, SAAT-ILO, New Delhi. Schmidt, P. (1986) - “Frontier Production Functions”, Econometric Reviews, Vol. 4. Shah, Amita (2001) – “Scalar Linkages in Industries: Implications for Productivity and Employment” in Amitabh Kundu and Alakh N. Sharma (eds.) ‘Informal Sector in India – Perspectives and Policies’, Institute for Human Development, New Delhi. __________ (2002) – “Making Informal Sector Viable and Growth Oriented”, Paper presented at the National Seminar on ‘Making Informal Sector Viable and Growth Oriented’ at Sardar Patel Institute of Economic and Social Research, Ahmedabad, September, 2002 Solow, R.M. (1957) - “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3. Unel, Bulent (2003) – “Productivity Trends in India’s Manufacturing Sector in the Last Two Decades”, IMF Working Papers WP/03/22, International Monetary Fund. Unni, J., N. Lalitha and U. Rani (2001) - "Economic Reforms and Productivity Trends in Indian Manufacturing”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 36, No. 41