Open Innovation Clusters: The Case of Cova da Beira Region (Portugal)

Leitão, João (2006): Open Innovation Clusters: The Case of Cova da Beira Region (Portugal).

Abstract

This paper aims to reveal the role played by open innovation schemes in the development of new competitive advantages. Furthermore, it aims to present a normative model for networking knowledge clusters, that is, traditional clusters that are applied to the case of the Cova da Beira region (Portugal) such as Agro-Food, Textile, and Public Sector; and a set of emergent clusters that include Bioscience, Biotechnology, Multimedia, Tourism, Health, and Knowledge. In this paper, the basic framework about clusters was expanded, taking as reference the studies of Porter (1985, 1990, 1998, 2005), Feldman (1994), Porter and Stern (2001), and Furman, Porter and Stern (2002). The problematic related to open innovation schemes is integrated in this framework in order to reveal the importance of building new kinds of open innovation networks that don’t involve the geographic concentration of the enterprises. After making a literature review in order to present the analytical framework that includes the clusters theory, a normative model is presented through the development of a case study applied to the Cova da Beira region (Portugal). This option is due to the existence of a local University that has historically interfaced the launching of open-innovation spin-offs into local and international clusters networks. The present paper reveals a high degree of originality, since it contributes to the introduction of the concept of open innovation into the literature about clusters. The main point is that open innovation provides two main implications to build up and leverage both internal and external knowledge into international clusters networks. First, this study presents a basic implication for several agents such as, entrepreneurs, researchers, and policy makers; that is, universities are principals in interfacing the sources of open innovation and the transfer of processes of knowledge into the international clusters networks. Second, it promotes the inclusion of the issue related to the creation of international and institutional networks in the short agenda of the referred agents in order to promote the introduction of new open innovation schemes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Clusters; Entrepreneurship; Institutional Networks; Open Innovation
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M13 - New Firms ; Startups; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M20 - General

References

AUDRETSCH, FELDMAN, 1996; “Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production”, American Economic Review, 86, p. 630 – 640.

BAPTISTA, SWANN, 1996; “The dynamics of industrial clusters: a comparative study of the US and UK computer industries”, London Business School, Centre for Business Strategy, Working Paper 165.

BAPTISTA, SWANN, 1998; “Do firms in clusters innovate more?”, Research Policy, 27 (1998), p.525 – 540.

BAPTISTA, 2000; “Do Innovations Diffuse faster within Geographical Clusters”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, p. 515 – 535.

CHESBROUGH, 2003; Open Innovation – The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.

FELDMAN, 1994; The Geography of Innovation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

FURMAN, PORTER, STERN, 2002; “The determinants of national innovative capacity”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, Issue 6, August 2002, p. 899 - 933.

GELAUFF, LEJOUR, 2006; “The new Lisbon Strategy - An estimation of the economic impact of reaching five Lisbon Targets”, Industrial Policy and Economic Reforms Papers, N.º 1, Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General, European Commission.

GLAESER, KALLAL, SCHEINKMAN, SHLEIFER, 1992; “Growth in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, 100, p. 1126 – 1152.

MÄRZ, 1991; Joseph Schumpeter – Scholar, Teacher and Politician, Yale University Press, London.

PORTER, 1985; Competitive Advantage, The Free Press, Macmillan, New York.

PORTER, 1990; The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan, London.

PORTER, 1998; “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, November – December, 1998, p. 77 - 89.

PORTER, STERN, 2001; “Inovação: A localização também conta”, Revista Portuguesa de Gestão, III Série, Ano 16, N.º 3, Jul/Ago/Set. 2001, p. 16 – 24.

PORTER, 2005; “Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index”, in M. Porter, K. Schwab and A. Lopez-Claros (eds.) The Global competitiveness Report 2005-2006, Palgrave Macmillan, World Economic Forum: New York, p. 43 – 47.

SNOWDOWN, STONEHOUSE, 2006; “Competitiveness in a globalised world: Michael Porter on the microeconomic foundations of the competitiveness of nations, regions, and firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, 37, p.163-175.