A Cross-Cultural Study of Reference Point Adaptation: Evidence from the China, Korea, and the US

Arkes, Hal and Hirshleifer, David and Jiang, Danling and Lim, Sonya (2007): A Cross-Cultural Study of Reference Point Adaptation: Evidence from the China, Korea, and the US.

Abstract

We examined reference point adaptation following gains or losses in security trading using participants from China, Korea, and the US. In both questionnaire studies and trading experiments with real money incentives, reference point adaptation was larger for Asians than for Americans. Subjects in all countries adapted their reference points more after a gain than after an equal-sized loss. When we introduced a forced sale intervention that highlighted a prior price change, Americans showed greater adaptation toward the new price, whereas Asians showed less adaptation. We offer possible explanations both for the cross-cultural similarities and the cross-cultural differences.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Prospect theory; cross-cultural differences; reference point adaptation; mental accounting; security trading
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

References

Arkes, H. R., C. Blumer. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.

Arkes, H. R., D. Hirshleifer, D. Jiang, S. S. Lim, 2008. Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105 67-81.

Barberis, N., M. Huang. 2001. Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. Journal of Finance 56 1247-1292.

Barberis, N., W. Xiong. 2008. What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation, forthcoming in Journal of Finance.

Baucells, M., M. Weber, F. Welfens. 2007. Reference point formation over time: A weighting function approach, Working paper, University of Mannheim.

Becker, G. M., M. H. DeGroot, J. Marschak. 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 9 226-232.

Bernartzi, S., R. H. Thaler. 1995. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 73-92.

Brislin, R. 1986. The wording and translation of research instruments. W. J. Lonner and J. W. Berry, eds. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research Methodology Series. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 8, 137-164.

Chen, H., A. Rao. 2002. Close encounters of two kinds: False alarms and dashed hopes. Marketing Science, 21,178-196.

Dimson E., P. Marsh, M. Staunton. 2007. Worldwide equity premium: A smaller puzzle. In R. Mehra (Ed.), Handbook of Investments: Equity Risk Premium (pp. 467-514). North-Holland.

Fama, E.F., K.R. French. 1998. Value versus growth: The international evidence. Journal of Finance 53 1975-1999.

Feng, L., M. S. Seasholes. 2005. Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Review of Finance 9 305–351.

Frederick, S. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (4), 25-42

Gneezy, U. 2005. Updating the reference point: Experimental evidence. Experimental Business Research Marketing, Accounting and Cognitive Perspectives Volume III (pp. 263-284), Springer US.

Grinblatt, M., B. Han. 2005, Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum, Journal of Financial Economics, 78, 311-339

Grinblatt, M., M. Keloharju. 2001. What makes investors trade? Journal of Finance 56 589-616.

Hardie, B.G.S., E. J. Johnson, P. S. Fader. 1993, Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice, Marketing Science, 12(4), 378-394

Heath, C., S. Huddart, M. Lang. 1999. Psychological factors and stock option exercise, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 601-627

Heath, C., R. P. Larrick, G. Wu. 1999. Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology 38 79-109.

Hsee, C. K., E. U. Weber. 1999. Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 165-179.

Ji, L.-J., R.E. Nisbett, Y. Su. 2001. Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science 12 450-456.

Kachelmeier, S. J., and M. Shehata. 1992. Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82, 1120-1141.

Kahneman, D., A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 263–292.

Keasey , K., P. Moon. 1996. Gambling with the house money in capital expenditure decisions: An experimental analysis, Economics Letters, 50 105-110

Levinson, J. D., K. Peng. 2006. Valuing cultural differences in behavioral economics. The ICFAI Journal of Behavioral Finance 1 32-47.

Mas, A. 2006. Pay, Reference points, and police performances, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 783-821

Morris, M. W., K. Peng. 1994. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 949-971

Shefrin, H., M. Statman. 1985. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 40 777-790.

Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill

Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 16 27-44.

Strahilevitz, M. A. and M. Loewenstein. 1998, The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research 25 276-289.

Thaler, R. H. 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science 4 199–214.

Thaler, R. H. 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 183–206.

Tversky, A., D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 297–323.

Weber, M, C. F. Camerer. 1998. The disposition effect in securities trading: an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33 167-184.

Weber, E. U., C. K. Hsee. 1998. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards risk. Management Science 44 1205-1217.

Weber, E. U., C. K. Hsee, J. Sokolowska. 1998. What folklore tells us about risk and risk taking: Cross-cultural comparisons of American, German, and Chinese proverbs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 170-186.

Wright, G. N., L. D. Phillips. 1980. Cultural variation in probabilistic thinking: Alternative ways of dealing with uncertainty. International Journal of Psychology 15 239-257.

Yates, J. F., J.-W. Lee, H. Shinotsuka, 1996, Beliefs about overconfidence, including its cross-national variation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65 138-147.

Yates, J. F., Y. Zhu, D. L. Ronis, D.-F. Wang, H. Shinotsuka, M. Toda. 1989. Probability judgment accuracy: China, Japan, and the United States. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 145-171.