2024-03-28T23:23:30Z
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/cgi/oai2
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:614
2019-10-19T11:02:44Z
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:635
2019-10-28T18:16:21Z
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:1625
2019-09-29T19:34:17Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D59:5934:593430
7375626A656374733D5A:5A31:5A3133
7375626A656374733D5A:5A31:5A3130
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1625/
Rethinking the Culture - Economy Dialectic
Brons, Lajos
Y40 - Dissertations (unclassified)
Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification
Z10 - General
B49 - Other
The culture - economy dialectic (CED), the opposition of the concepts and phenomena of culture and economy, is one of the most important notions in the modern history of ideas. Both the disciplinary boundaries and much theoretical thought in social science are strongly influenced or even determined by the CED. Hence, a thorough analysis and evaluation of the CED might be useful to better understand the history of ideas in social science and the currently fashionable research on the cultural influences on economic differences between countries and regions.
This book, my PhD thesis, attempts to do just that. The concepts of "culture" and "economy" (and related concepts) and the (assumed) relationships therebetween are compared and analysed. Empirical results from earlier studies are summarised and some new test are presented. These new tests are partly based on a measurement of Dutch regional culture. However, it appeared that most theories of the CED are (nearly) impossible to (empirically) verify. There seems to be some influence of wealth on specific cultural phenomena (such individualism and post-materialism), but the often assumed influence of culture on entrepreneurship and economic growth remains unconfirmed. Moreover, from an analysis of the theories themselves, it appears that most of these cannot be falsified and are, therefore, hardly 'scientific'.
Many of the theories of the CED and, in fact, many theories of social science in general are of a conceptual rather than a causal nature. These theories cannot easily be falsified by empirical means alone, but must be studied by means of conceptual analysis. In the final conclusions, this book, therefore, argues for conceptual analysis in, and a more anarchist approach to, social science.
2005-06
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1625/1/MPRA_paper_1625.pdf
Brons, Lajos (2005): Rethinking the Culture - Economy Dialectic. Published in: (June 2005)
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:3862
2019-09-26T22:30:31Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423533
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413132
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3862/
A Discussion on Empirical Micro-Bases of Hayek’s Methodological Individualism
Zhao, Liang
Zhu, Xian Chen
B49 - Other
B53 - Austrian
A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
There are essential differences in ‘methodological individualism(MI)’ between neoclassic economics and Hayek’s theory. On basis of The Sensory Order, this paper shows relations between Hayek’s MI and it, the micro-bases of Hayek’s MI from contemporarily empirical disciplines, and some viewpoints verified by succeeding ones; then points out some questions that need to be answered henceforth between Hayek’s theory and interdisciplinary studies in modern economics. It is concluded that Hayek’s MI has its empirical micro-bases, and that his interdisciplinary exploration in the youth can help advance modern economics.
2007-06-05
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3862/1/MPRA_paper_3862.pdf
Zhao, Liang and Zhu, Xian Chen (2007): A Discussion on Empirical Micro-Bases of Hayek’s Methodological Individualism.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:4665
2019-10-07T02:58:47Z
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:6965
2019-09-28T09:49:06Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423530
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423533
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433030
7375626A656374733D42:4230:423030
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6965/
John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability
van den Hauwe, Ludwig
B50 - General
B53 - Austrian
B40 - General
B49 - Other
C00 - General
B00 - General
The economic paradigms of Ludwig von Mises on the one hand and of John Maynard Keynes on the other have been correctly recognized as antithetical at the theoretical level, and as antagonistic with respect to their practical and public policy implications. Characteristically they have also been vindicated by opposing sides of the political spectrum. Nevertheless the respective views of these authors with respect to the meaning and interpretation of probability exhibit a closer conceptual affinity than has been acknowledged in the literature. In particular it is argued that in some relevant respects Ludwig von Mises´ interpretation of the concept of probability exhibits a closer affinity with the interpretation of probability developed by his opponent John Maynard Keynes than with the views on probability espoused by his brother Richard von Mises. Nevertheless there also exist significant differences between the views of Ludwig von Mises and those of John Maynard Keynes with respect to probability. One of these is highlighted more particularly: where John Maynard Keynes advocated a monist view of probability, Ludwig von Mises embraced a dualist view of probability, according to which the concept of probability has two different meanings each of which is valid in a particular area or context. It is concluded that both John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises presented highly nuanced views with respect to the meaning and interpretation of probability.
2007-03-12
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6965/1/MPRA_paper_6965.pdf
van den Hauwe, Ludwig (2007): John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:7429
2019-09-26T19:31:05Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423530
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423533
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433030
7375626A656374733D42:4230:423030
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/7429/
John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability
van den Hauwe, Ludwig
B50 - General
B53 - Austrian
B40 - General
B49 - Other
C00 - General
B00 - General
The economic paradigms of Ludwig von Mises on the one hand and of John Maynard Keynes on the other have been correctly recognized as antithetical at the theoretical level, and as antagonistic with respect to their practical and public policy implications. Characteristically they have also been vindicated by opposing sides of the political spectrum. Nevertheless the respective views of these authors with respect to the meaning and interpretation of probability exhibit a closer conceptual affinity than has been acknowledged in the literature. In particular it is argued that in some relevant respects Ludwig von Mises´ interpretation of the concept of probability exhibits a closer affinity with the interpretation of probability developed by his opponent John Maynard Keynes than with the views on probability espoused by his brother Richard von Mises. Nevertheless there also exist significant differences between the views of Ludwig von Mises and those of John Maynard Keynes with respect to probability. One of these is highlighted more particularly: where John Maynard Keynes advocated a monist view of probability, Ludwig von Mises embraced a dualist view of probability, according to which the concept of probability has two different meanings each of which is valid in a particular area or context. It is concluded that both John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises presented highly nuanced views with respect to the meaning and interpretation of probability.
2007-03-12
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/7429/1/MPRA_paper_7429.pdf
van den Hauwe, Ludwig (2007): John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:7629
2019-09-28T18:12:51Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D49:4933:493331
7375626A656374733D42:4231:423134
7375626A656374733D48:4833:483331
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413132
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D4A:4A31:4A3132
7375626A656374733D44:4436:443630
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/7629/
Family evolution and contemporary social transformations
Sergio, Reuben
I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being
B14 - Socialist ; Marxist
H31 - Household
A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
B49 - Other
J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse
D60 - General
In the first place, this paper intends to analyze the kind of relationships existing inside the family. In order to do that, the author makes an effort to reconsider its historical forming process applying the classical anthropological texts. At this stage, the analysis proposes two different types of relationships between human beings, the primal, which arose from the most elementary feelings of love, protection, accompaniment, and the strictly social, risen from the needs of cooperation and collective work. The family is the expression of both kinds of relationships. In the second place, this work analyzes the nuclear family as a result of a historical process associated to the development of capital and the social conditions that make possible its consolidation. And in the third place, the author proposes the discussion on the crisis of the nuclear family under the perspective of the contemporary global transformation of the accumulation of capital. As a conclusion: some reflections on the perspectives that these transformations offer to the role of the family.
2005
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/7629/1/MPRA_paper_7629.pdf
Sergio, Reuben (2005): Family evolution and contemporary social transformations. Published in: Journal of comparative Family Studies , Vol. 37, No. No. 4
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:8474
2019-09-26T22:33:49Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8474/
The Bayesian Fallacy: Distinguishing Four Kinds of Beliefs
Khalil, Elias
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
This paper distinguishes among four kinds of beliefs: conviction, confidence, perception, conception. Conviction concerns self-ability:“I can build these stairs.” Confidence also concerns the self—ut focuses on the assertion of will in the face of weakness of will. Perception is about the environment such as weather prediction. Conception is also about the environment—but usually couched with context. While convictions are noncognitive and nonevidential beliefs, the other beliefs are either cognitive, evidential, or both. This paper uses the terms “cognition” and “evidentiality” as axes to distinguish the four beliefs. While “cognitive beliefs” are about one’s environment, “noncognitive beliefs” are about one’s self. While the cognitive/noncognitive divide is unconventional, it generates a payoff in light of the evidentiality axis. While “evidential beliefs” are correctable via Bayes’s rule, “nonevidential beliefs” are not. However, when the nonevidential belief is about the environment, the evidence can at least make the belief more (or less) warranted—where “warrantability” is a weaker criterion than “correctability.” And when the nonevidential belief is about the self, i.e., a conviction, the evidence cannot even make the belief more (or less) warranted. The evidence itself develops when one tries to test a conviction. This paper highlights that convictions are the basis of tenacity—crucial for entrepreneurship and economic growth. This paper further demonstrates how three major theories of action—standard rationality, normative theory, and procedural rationality—fail to distinguish the four kinds of beliefs. They, hence, commit, although in different ways, a set of confusions called here the “Bayesian fallacy.”
2008-04-26
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8474/1/MPRA_paper_8474.pdf
Khalil, Elias (2008): The Bayesian Fallacy: Distinguishing Four Kinds of Beliefs.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:10530
2019-09-28T21:08:58Z
7374617475733D696E7072657373
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D43:4332:433232
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423431
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10530/
Do we need time series econometrics
Rao, B. Bhaskara
Singh, Rup
Kumar, Saten
B49 - Other
C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes
B41 - Economic Methodology
Whether or not there is a need for the unit roots and cointegration based time series econometric methods is a methodological issue. An alternative is the econometrics of the London School of Economics (LSE) and Hendry approach based on the simpler classical methods of estimation. This is known as the general to specific method (GETS). Like all other methodological issues it is difficult to resolve which approach is better. However, we think that GETS is conceptually simpler and very useful in applied work.
2008-01-16
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10530/1/MPRA_paper_10530.pdf
Rao, B. Bhaskara and Singh, Rup and Kumar, Saten (2008): Do we need time series econometrics. Forthcoming in: Applied Economic Letters : pp. 1-4.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:11443
2019-10-01T21:20:50Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D51:5135:513537
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11443/
Reconciling resource economics and ecological economics: the economics of sustainability and resilience
Beard, Rodney
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology
Cross disciplinary dialogue between economics and ecology has within economics
centered on the two subdisciplines of bioeconomics and ecological economics. This
division in economics re
ects the division in ecology between population and sys-
tems ecologists. Recent developments in ecology are aimed at a more integrated
approach to ecologic al research. One example of such an approach is that of models
based on thermodynamic reaction networks. By applying the \Law of Mass Action"
to biochemical descriptions of ecological networks, it is possible to reformulate eco-
logical systems models as population dynamic models, which can then be embedded
within a bioeconomic model framework. Analysis of bioeconomic models far from
thermodynamic equilibrium is then possible from within either a steady-state or ergodic framework. The Glansdorff-Prigogine or other related stability criteria from
non-equilibrium thermodynamics may then be applied to the study of bioeconomic
systems.
1995
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11443/2/MPRA_paper_11443.pdf
Beard, Rodney (1995): Reconciling resource economics and ecological economics: the economics of sustainability and resilience.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:12402
2019-10-26T17:22:37Z
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:12670
2019-09-28T04:46:30Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4230
7375626A656374733D44:4436
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413133
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413132
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D49:4930:493030
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413130
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413134
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12670/
Menschenrechte, Soziale Grundrechte, Sozialrecht – Versuch einer Näherung
Herrmann, Peter
B0 - General
D6 - Welfare Economics
A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
B49 - Other
I00 - General
A10 - General
A14 - Sociology of Economics
The essay proposes in a brief sketch a methodology that allows assessing human rights beyond absolutism of abstract rights and relativist views which usually end in meaningless of the concept.
2009-01-01
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12670/1/MPRA_paper_12670.pdf
Herrmann, Peter (2009): Menschenrechte, Soziale Grundrechte, Sozialrecht – Versuch einer Näherung.
de
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:21428
2019-09-28T16:48:10Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443033
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21428/
"But Can't we Get the Same Thing with a Standard Model?" Rationalizing Bounded-Rationality Models
Spiegler, Ran
D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
B49 - Other
This paper discusses a common criticism of economic models that depart from the standard rational-choice paradigm - namely, that the phenomena addressed by such models can be "rationalized" by some standard model. I criticize this criterion for evaluating bounded-rationality models. Using a market model with boundedly rational consumers due to Spiegler (2006a) as a test case, I show that even when it initially appears that a bounded-rationality model can be rationalized by a standard model, the rationalizing models tend to come with unwarranted "extra baggage". I conclude that we should impose a greater burden of proof on rationalizations that are offered in refutation of such models.
2010-03-15
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21428/1/MPRA_paper_21428.pdf
Spiegler, Ran (2010): "But Can't we Get the Same Thing with a Standard Model?" Rationalizing Bounded-Rationality Models.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:21863
2019-09-29T01:43:08Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D4E:4E35:4E3530
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D51:5130:513031
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21863/
Agricultural holdings: hindsight and foresight
Laurent, Catherine
Rémy, Jacques
N50 - General, International, or Comparative
B49 - Other
Q01 - Sustainable Development
In France, the concept of the agricultural holding is a result of a lengthy social construction in which the stages in classification and statistical work have proceeded in tune with the major political struggles and social debates of the 19th and 20th centuries. Some people argue that the “ agricultural holding ” is now just a term revived from the past for the modern “ agricultural enterprise ”. Sociologists and economists therefore need to reconsider the significance and relevance of this concept.
The diversity of the ways of practising agricultural activities encountered in French households shows that the economic and social realities referred to in this concept are far too varied for its use in defining a productive sector having an institutional existence. Neither can it be used to demark the social groups that will be entitled to benefit from the support measures of agricul-tural and rural development policies.
As a basic statistical unit, however the concept of the agricultural holding can provide a com-mon basic unit for measuring agricultural activity, and the land used for this activity, thereby permitting the integration of results concerning the different functions of agricultural activity (production, natural resource management, land use, socio-economic cohesion, etc.). From this angle, the statistical notion of the agricultural holding as presently defined is of increasing interest for the management of new agricultural and rural policies and for social sciences research.
1998
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21863/1/MPRA_paper_21863.pdf
Laurent, Catherine and Rémy, Jacques (1998): Agricultural holdings: hindsight and foresight. Published in: Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Developpement No. 31 (1998): pp. 415-430.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:27626
2019-09-26T09:11:17Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D43:4338:433839
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27626/
Commodity-industry classificationproxy: A correspondence table between SITC revision 2 and ISIC revision 3
M. Affendy, Arip
Sim Yee, Lau
Satoru, Madono
B49 - Other
C89 - Other
The correspondence table is one of the important tools in categorizing existing records into different perspective. It helps to understand the pattern of various economic activities from single source of data. Nevertheless, most of the existing correspondence tables have been focusing more on the latest classification and neglect the correspondence for the older version. Since some analysis would require longer series of data, therefore it is necessary to create a correspondence table for the earlier version of classification. This paper devoted to create a correspondence table between SITC Revision 2 and ISIC Revision 3 using a proxy method. The proxy is done using the SITC Rev.2 – SITC Rev.3 correspondence table and the SITC Rev.3 – ISIC Rev.3 correspondence table. This method has capable to directly find an industrial match for more than 98 percent of commodities under SITC Rev.3. For remaining commodities which industrial category cannot be matched directly, the identification was done automatically based on the closest code.
2010-03
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27626/1/MPRA_paper_27626.pdf
M. Affendy, Arip and Sim Yee, Lau and Satoru, Madono (2010): Commodity-industry classificationproxy: A correspondence table between SITC revision 2 and ISIC revision 3. Published in: Journal of International Economic Studies , Vol. March, No. 24 : pp. 185-202.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:37280
2019-09-26T13:14:43Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D4E:4E38
7375626A656374733D4E:4E38:4E3837
7375626A656374733D4E:4E30:4E3031
7375626A656374733D42:4230
7375626A656374733D4E:4E38:4E3830
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37280/
The silence of the archive: post-colonialism and the practice of historical reconstruction from archival evidence
Decker, Stephanie
N8 - Micro-Business History
N87 - Africa ; Oceania
N01 - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods
B0 - General
N80 - General, International, or Comparative
B49 - Other
History as a discipline has been accused of being a-theoretical. For business historians working at business schools, however, the issue of methodology looms larger, as it is hard to make contributions to social science debates without explicating one’s disciplinary methodology. This paper seeks to outline an important aspect of historical methodology, which is data collection from archives. In this area, postcolonialism has made significant methodological contributions not just for non-Western history, as it has emphasized the importance of considering how archives were created, and how one can legitimately use them despite their limitations.
2012-02-22
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37280/1/MPRA_paper_37280.pdf
Decker, Stephanie (2012): The silence of the archive: post-colonialism and the practice of historical reconstruction from archival evidence.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:41492
2019-09-26T23:40:53Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D49:4933:493330
7375626A656374733D46:4631:463136
7375626A656374733D41:4133:413332
7375626A656374733D44:4436:443633
7375626A656374733D41:4132:413230
7375626A656374733D48:4835:483533
7375626A656374733D43:4331:433139
7375626A656374733D4A:4A30:4A3038
7375626A656374733D44:4433:443331
7375626A656374733D42:4231:423139
7375626A656374733D45:4532:453234
7375626A656374733D46:4630:463031
7375626A656374733D42:4232:423239
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433030
7375626A656374733D49:4930
7375626A656374733D42:4230:423030
7375626A656374733D44:4437:443734
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413133
7375626A656374733D4A:4A33
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D4A:4A35
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41492/
Diseguaglianza, conflitto sociale e sindacati in America
Lettieri, Antonio
I30 - General
F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
A32 - Collective Volumes
D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
A20 - General
H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
C19 - Other
J08 - Labor Economics Policies
D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
B19 - Other
E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity
F01 - Global Outlook
B29 - Other
C00 - General
I0 - General
B00 - General
D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions
A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
A comparison of the 2007-08 crisis with that of 1929 showed its extreme gravity, but it also may have implied that the old harmful mistakes would not be repeated. After four years, the crisis has not been solved and it even threatens to worsen. Neo-conservative Republicans claim that this is proof of the failure of Keynesian policies. Yet, there is something structurally distorted in the institutions and policies of American industrial relations. The fall of the ‘social contract’ is the basic element of the crisis of the American social and economic model. In comparison with the crisis of the Thirties and its aftermath, what initially was supposed to possibly evolve toward a new New Deal of the Twenty-first century has evolved just in its opposite.
2012-06-30
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41492/1/MPRA_paper_41492.pdf
Lettieri, Antonio (2012): Diseguaglianza, conflitto sociale e sindacati in America. Published in: Moneta e Credito , Vol. Vol 65, No. N° 258 (June 2012): pp. 115-144.
it
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:44417
2019-10-17T16:52:25Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D41:4131
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413139
7375626A656374733D41:4132
7375626A656374733D41:4132:413239
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423431
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423530
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D43:4330
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433030
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433032
7375626A656374733D43:4334
7375626A656374733D43:4335
7375626A656374733D43:4335:433530
7375626A656374733D43:4335:433533
7375626A656374733D43:4335:433534
7375626A656374733D50:5030
7375626A656374733D50:5030:503030
7375626A656374733D50:5031
7375626A656374733D50:5032
7375626A656374733D50:5035
7375626A656374733D59:5938:593830
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44417/
Foundations of the economic and social history of the United States: Metaphysical
Albers, Scott
A1 - General Economics
A19 - Other
A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
A29 - Other
B40 - General
B41 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches
B50 - General
B59 - Other
C0 - General
C00 - General
C02 - Mathematical Methods
C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics
C5 - Econometric Modeling
C50 - General
C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods
C54 - Quantitative Policy Modeling
P0 - General
P00 - General
P1 - Capitalist Systems
P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies
P5 - Comparative Economic Systems
Y80 - Related Disciplines
"Oppositional Analysis" - the name I give to the metaphysics presented in this volume - proposes a number of dichotomies through which one may analyze and understand systematically the structure of every level of reality. Macroeconomic theory, as well as social research, are two excellent stages upon which we may search for clues and insights to the interaction of oppositions. This is so particularly in connection with an analysis of the precepts of the "Austrian School" of macroeconomics as presented by Ludwig von Mises in his well-known and highly influential book Human Action.
Based upon the circuit given for a musical note (see the Apologia and the Introduction to Volume 2, as well as the more extensive treatment herein) and the "Circuit of Being" which will be introduced in this final volume, I propose a model of economics which may correlate with a view of the physical universe of five dimensions as suggested by Theodor Kaluza.
I suggest that these dichotomies may underlie the unity created by Kaluza’s work between General Relativity and Maxwell’s equations for electro-magnetism. If this is so, Oppositional Analysis and the economic and social history of the United States may provide a starting point from which we may learn important insights as to the inner workings of these economic and social oppositions as well oppositions of a more physical nature.
2013-02-15
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44417/1/MPRA_paper_44417.pdf
Albers, Scott (2013): Foundations of the economic and social history of the United States: Metaphysical.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:46767
2019-09-27T19:22:10Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46767/
Методологическая концепция анализа социально-экономических систем
Filippova, Irina
B49 - Other
The purpose of the monography is to develop the methodology for analysis of socio-economic systems. To this end, we propose a holistic concept including the system of interrelated concepts and categories, exposing the underlying mechanisms, cause-and-effect relationships and regularities of socio-economic processes.
All the more urgent problem is the control of socio-economic processes on the basis of a clear understanding of the hidden underlying mechanisms that give rise to social dynamics. But effective governance requires, firstly, a clear statement of purpose, secondly, the "feedback" from "managed object", ie the monitoring of social reality on the basis of a clear set of indicators characterizing the orientation of social dynamics.
In this perspective, the main goal of regulation should be the social progress based on a economic growth subservient to first one. That brings to the fore the problem of accurate determination of the content of this concept.
Monitoring the social reality suggests the formulation of key indicators for the "feedback".
Thus, if the main purpose of the research is to seek for the way of increasing the controllability of the socio-economic processes, we should elucidate their underlying mechanisms and influencing factors, secondly, clearly identify key indicators, and third, formulate the basic principles of regulation.
2012
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46767/1/MPRA_paper_46767.pdf
Filippova, Irina (2012): Методологическая концепция анализа социально-экономических систем. Published in:
ru
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:51776
2019-10-05T21:54:26Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235
7375626A656374733D43:4330
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433030
7375626A656374733D44:4430
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443030
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443031
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443033
7375626A656374733D44:4438
7375626A656374733D44:4438:443830
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/51776/
Reason-Based Rationalization
Dietrich, Franz
List, Christian
B40 - General
B49 - Other
B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches
C0 - General
C00 - General
D0 - General
D00 - General
D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
D80 - General
We introduce a “reason-based” way of rationalizing an agent’s choice behaviour, which explains choices by specifying which properties of the options or choice context
the agent cares about (the “motivationally salient properties”) and how he or she cares about these properties (the “fundamental preference relation”). Reason-based rationalizations can explain non-classical choice behaviour, including boundedly rational and sophisticated rational behaviour, and predict choices in unobserved contexts, an issue neglected in standard choice theory. We characterize the behavioural implications of different reason-based models and distinguish two kinds of context-dependent motivation: “context-variant” motivation, where the agent cares about different properties in different contexts, and “context-regarding” motivation, where the agent cares not only about properties of the options, but also about properties relating to the context.
2013-11-25
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/51776/1/MPRA_paper_51776.pdf
Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian (2013): Reason-Based Rationalization.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:56749
2019-09-30T09:50:28Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D45:4532:453234
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56749/
Towards Full Employment Through Applied Algebra and Counter-Intuitive Behavior
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity
It is common knowledge that neither Walrasians nor Keynesians nor
Marxians nor Institutionialists nor Austrians nor Sraffaians came to grips
with profit. The reason is a defective formal basis. In the present paper the
formal foundations are first renewed. When the profit theory is false the rest
of an approach is questionable. What is reexamined next because of its vital
practical implications is the theory of employment. One remarkable result is
that the popular recipe to eliminate unemployment, viz. downward wage rate
flexibility, is self-defeating because it does not take the objective systemic
properties of the monetary economy into account.
2014-06-18
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56749/1/MPRA_paper_56749.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): Towards Full Employment Through Applied Algebra and Counter-Intuitive Behavior.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:58183
2019-09-27T16:46:23Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D41:4132:413230
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423431
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423530
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423531
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423532
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423533
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58183/
Кризис русской социальной философии
Kaluzhsky, Mikhail
A20 - General
B40 - General
B41 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
B50 - General
B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian
B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary
B53 - Austrian
Too often today we hear that the Russian social philosophy is not demanded by society, the state ignores the opinion of the humanities. Is this true? Opinion Regional Development Fund and the security of the Omsk region covers FRRB Deputy Director Mikhail Leonidovich Kaluzhsky.
1997
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58183/1/MPRA_paper_58183.pdf
Kaluzhsky, Mikhail (1997): Кризис русской социальной философии. Published in: Region + No. 2 (1997): pp. 71-72.
ru
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:58185
2019-10-08T05:01:02Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423532
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D4F:4F32:4F3239
7375626A656374733D5A:5A31
7375626A656374733D5A:5A31:5A3132
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58185/
Рациональная функция протестантизма
Kaluzhsky, Mikhail
B4 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary
B59 - Other
O29 - Other
Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology
Z12 - Religion
Article about the role of Protestantism in shaping the conditions for successful social and economic development of the state. The author compares the Orthodoxy in Russia and European Protestantism as the ideological foundation of ensuring social stability and social progress of the state.
1998
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58185/1/MPRA_paper_58185.pdf
Kaluzhsky, Mikhail (1998): Рациональная функция протестантизма. Published in: Протестантизм. Общество. Культура: Материалы междунар. научн. конференции «Протестантизм в Сибири». (1998): pp. 61-65.
ru
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:58210
2019-10-08T04:51:48Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423431
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423532
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423533
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D44:4435
7375626A656374733D50:5030
7375626A656374733D50:5030:503030
7375626A656374733D5A:5A31:5A3133
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58210/
Формирование и развитие социальных систем
Kaluzhsky, Mikhail
B40 - General
B41 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary
B53 - Austrian
B59 - Other
D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
P0 - General
P00 - General
Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification
An article about the dialectical laws of the genesis of social organization and social systems. The author suggests using a new classification of social relations for the methodological study of the evolution of social systems. The work is based on the methodology of general systems theory and the theory of I.R. Prigogine.
2006
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58210/1/MPRA_paper_58210.pdf
Kaluzhsky, Mikhail (2006): Формирование и развитие социальных систем. Published in: Научные основы организации управленческого труда / Материалы Всеросс. научно-практич. конференции. No. Секция 1. Организационные аспекты управления. (2006): pp. 10-24.
ru
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:58253
2019-09-26T16:27:22Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D45:4531:453130
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58253/
The Three Fatal Mistakes of Yesterday Economics: Profit, I=S, Employment
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
E10 - General
Axiomatization is the prime task of theoretical economics. Without correct axioms,no correct theory. Without correct theory, no understanding of how the economy works. Without empirically corroborated understanding, no useful economic policy advice. Yet, much more important than any political reputation of economics is indeed: without correct axioms, no acceptance as science. There is no way around it, neither for Orthodoxy nor for Heterodoxy. The conceptual consequence of this paper is to discard the subjective-behavioral axioms and to take objective-structural axioms as the formal point of departure. This enables the rectification of the most fatal analytical mistakes of conventional economics.
2014-09-02
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58253/1/MPRA_paper_58253.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): The Three Fatal Mistakes of Yesterday Economics: Profit, I=S, Employment.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:58842
2019-10-01T08:23:37Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D45:4531:453137
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58842/
The Synthesis of Economic Law, Evolution, and History
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
E17 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
It has long been criticized that history is almost entirely absent from orthodox economics. This deficiency is due to the fact that equilibrium and time make an odd couple. Because equilibrium is one of the crucial hard-core propositions of the research program it cannot be abandoned. This impedes the treatment of time in a methodologically acceptable manner. The orthodox
approach is based on indefensible axioms which are in this paper replaced by objective structural axioms. This enables the synthesis of timeless economic laws, randomness, and goal-oriented human action, which are the essential elements of a formally consistent historical account.
2014-09-24
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58842/1/MPRA_paper_58842.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): The Synthesis of Economic Law, Evolution, and History.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:59012
2019-09-28T21:29:52Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413133
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D4F:4F34:4F3439
7375626A656374733D50:5035:503539
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59012/
Nepal-Potential Projects in a New Model of Economy
Paunić, Alida
A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
B49 - Other
O49 - Other
P59 - Other
Rising GDP level is aim of each economy in the world and in that respect Nepal doesn’t differ. Difficulties in obtaining better impulse in the growth creation shows signs of short and long term weaknesses in economic or political process. Some help in achieving better standards are presented by three projects as well as offering some new insight into possible model change. Building a new model or growing from existing one is not a matter of copy/ paste data from country to country, but necessity and recognition that numerous possibilities to improve exist by cooperation with region ,world but at the same time being aware of its own standards, limitations and strengths. This process is area of constant development, error recognition and correction what is also to be recognized and to further develop in a process of finding economic and social path to go.
2014-10-01
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59012/2/MPRA_paper_59012.pdf
Paunić, Alida (2014): Nepal-Potential Projects in a New Model of Economy.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:59411
2019-09-30T08:08:09Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D44:4433:443330
7375626A656374733D45:4532:453235
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59411/
The Profit Theory is False Since Adam Smith. What About the True Distribution Theory?
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
D30 - General
E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
All popular schools lack a consistent profit theory. Economists have no true conception of the most important phenomenon in their universe. This methodological defect persists since Adam Smith. Therefore, the theories of income and wealth distribution are wrong by logical implication. If the conclusions of a theory do not find any counterpart in reality the fault lies in the premises. In order to rectify distribution theory it is necessary to substitute the conventional subjective-behavioral axioms by objective-structural axioms. A major result of the present paper is that distribution is not governed by marginal productivity but by the distributed profit ratio.
2014-10-21
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59411/1/MPRA_paper_59411.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): The Profit Theory is False Since Adam Smith. What About the True Distribution Theory?
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:59659
2019-09-28T16:40:25Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443033
7375626A656374733D44:4434:443430
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59659/
Economics for Economists
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
D40 - General
The characteristic capability of science – to turn whatever it might touch into knowledge – seems to have eluded economics. Currently, economists do not understand how the economy works. To get out of the cul-de-sac requires a paradigm shift. It consists in replacing behavioral axioms by structural axioms. The subject matter of theoretical economics is not human behavior
but systemic behavior. From the structural analysis follows a new Law of Supply and Demand and a new Profit Law for the economy as a whole. The conventional supply-demand-equilibrium approach is refuted. This implies that the reliance on the spontaneous order metaphor is unfounded.
2014-11-03
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59659/1/MPRA_paper_59659.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): Economics for Economists.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:60097
2019-09-27T11:17:24Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423431
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60097/
The Contrast between Mainstream and Heterodox Economics: A Misleading Controversy—“Necessary” System versus “Natural” System
Fusari, Angelo
B40 - General
B41 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
This article focuses on a broad distinction within economic thinking and the methodological
misconceptions that are implied by it. We find today, on the one hand, mainstream economics, which uses both the
method of abstract rationality typical of the logical-formal sciences and the method of the natural sciences—two
methodologies that, as we shall prove, are inappropriate for the study of social reality. On the other hand we find
the opponents of mainstream economics, primarily heterodox economics, who emphasize methodological
pluralism and lend, in the extreme, their support to the relativist view that all views may be right in their own way.
Such an unconstrained pluralist attitude to method obstructs interaction and reciprocal understanding among
students, the scientific appreciation of theoretical contributions and the same fecundating role of pluralism.
We shall see that methodological diffuseness is the primary factor explaining the failure of attacks against
mainstream economics and we shall look for a solution to this embarrassing impotence by searching for general
methodological procedure and rules fully appropriate to the scientific study of social reality.
2014-07
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60097/1/MPRA_paper_60097.pdf
Fusari, Angelo (2014): The Contrast between Mainstream and Heterodox Economics: A Misleading Controversy—“Necessary” System versus “Natural” System. Published in: Journal of Business and Economics , Vol. 5, No. N° 7 (July 2014): pp. 1077-1091.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:60543
2019-09-27T18:03:48Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60543/
Onblog Economics Muddle Busting
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
The representative economist does not understand the two most important phenomena in the economic universe: profit and income. Because of this economists have nothing to offer in the way of a scientifically founded advice.
Therefore, the contributions to economic blogs cannot claim to offer more than personal opinion. Of opinions, though, economics always had plenty. What is needed is knowledge – scientific knowledge, that is. With the outline of the correct economic paradigm at hand it is straightforward to refute obsolete approaches. For this purpose the economics blogs are ideal. A selection of
recent comments is reproduced in the present paper.
2014-12-11
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60543/1/MPRA_paper_60543.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2014): Onblog Economics Muddle Busting.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:61773
2019-09-26T17:06:58Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D4D:4D31:4D3131
7375626A656374733D50:5035:503539
7375626A656374733D51:5131:513132
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61773/
The system of indicators of estimation the economic efficiency in the production of goat milk
Chetroiu, Rodica
Calin, Ion
B49 - Other
M11 - Production Management
P59 - Other
Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
The analysis of economic efficiency is the main method of economic systems analysis. This concept is the most important qualitative indicator of the economic development, essential factor in accelerating the economic growth and is also one of the criteria for scientific substantiation of decisions. Applied in the milk production domain, represents the obtaining of maximum quantity of milk per animal, with minimal expenditure of manpower and
materials. Regarding determining the economic efficiency of goat milk production, the most used indicators are: total
physical production, average production, value of total production (total revenue), production costs, material costs, cost per unit, profit, rate of return, breakeven point etc. The paper presents the calculation method of indicators and their average values for 2014.
2014-11-20
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61773/1/MPRA_paper_61773.pdf
Chetroiu, Rodica and Calin, Ion (2014): The system of indicators of estimation the economic efficiency in the production of goat milk. Published in: Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania , Vol. 5, No. ISSN 2285–6803 ISSN-L 2285–6803 (20 November 2014): pp. 296-304.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:64426
2019-09-28T22:42:51Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D45:4531:453139
7375626A656374733D47:4730:473030
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/64426/
Essentials of Constructive Heterodoxy: Financial Markets
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
E19 - Other
G00 - General
What stands before all eyes as failed Orthodoxy is ultimately caused by the wrong answer to Mill's Starting Problem. It is now pretty obvious that one cannot put utility maximization, equilibrium, well-behaved production functions, ergodicity or any other physical or psychological or sociological or behavioral assumption into the premises. No way leads from such premises to the explanation of how the actual market economy works. The logical consequence is to discard them. Having first secured a superior formal starting point, the present paper addresses the question of how the various types of financial markets emerge from the elementary monetary circuit.
2015-05-17
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/64426/1/MPRA_paper_64426.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2015): Essentials of Constructive Heterodoxy: Financial Markets.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:64666
2019-09-27T10:15:25Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423430
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423530
7375626A656374733D43:4330
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433030
7375626A656374733D43:4330:433032
7375626A656374733D44:4430
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443031
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443033
7375626A656374733D44:4438
7375626A656374733D44:4438:443830
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/64666/
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework
Dietrich, Franz
List, Christian
B40 - General
B49 - Other
B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches
B50 - General
C0 - General
C00 - General
C02 - Mathematical Methods
D0 - General
D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
D80 - General
We introduce a “reason-based” framework for explaining and predicting individual choices. It captures the idea that a decision-maker focuses on some but not all properties of the options and chooses an option whose motivationally salient properties he/she most prefers. Reason-based explanations allow us to distinguish between two kinds of context-dependent choice: the motivationally salient properties may (i) vary across choice contexts, and (ii) include not only “intrinsic” properties of the options, but also “context-related” properties. Our framework can accommodate boundedly rational and sophisticatedly rational choice. Since properties can be recombined in new ways, it also o↵ers resources for predicting choices in unobserved contexts.
2015-05
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/64666/1/MPRA_paper_64666.pdf
Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian (2015): Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:65666
2019-09-27T05:36:22Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
7375626A656374733D43:4336:433633
7375626A656374733D45:4531:453130
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/65666/
Major Defects of the Market Economy
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling
E10 - General
When we characterize an argument that has no sound theoretical foundation as political, then what has been produced by economists so far is political economics. However, since the Classics and Marx all major economic schools have defended the claim that they were doing science. This claim has been convincingly rebutted. So, the task is still before us. The way forward is to move from behavioral to structural economics. In what we should be mostly interested are not so much the behavioral defects of economic agents but the structural defects of the market system and how to repair them.
2015-07-17
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/65666/1/MPRA_paper_65666.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2015): Major Defects of the Market Economy.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:69581
2019-10-06T03:52:26Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235:423539
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69581/
How the Intelligent Non-Economist can Refute Every Economist Hands Down
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont
B49 - Other
B59 - Other
Most non-economists tend to think that economists know what they are talking about when they use specific terms like income, profit, capital, market equilibrium, and so on. This is not the case. What, then, follows from the well-documented fact that the representative economist has no idea of what profit is? Quite simple: if the core concept profit is false then the whole economic theory/model is false. This holds for the Walrasian, the Keynesian, the Marxian, and the Austrian approach.
2016-01-20
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69581/1/MPRA_paper_68934.pdf
Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2016): How the Intelligent Non-Economist can Refute Every Economist Hands Down.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:78029
2019-09-27T03:45:31Z
7374617475733D696E7072657373
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D43:4337:433732
7375626A656374733D4E:4E34:4E3433
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/78029/
A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Waterloo Campaign and Some Comments on the Analytic Narrative Project
Mongin, Philippe
B49 - Other
C72 - Noncooperative Games
N43 - Europe: Pre-1913
Abstract: The paper has a twofold aim. On the one hand, it provides what appears to be the first game-theoretic modelling of Napoléon’s last campaign, which ended dramatically on 18 June 1815 at Waterloo. It is specifically concerned with the decision Napoléon made on 17 June 1815 to detach part of his army and send it against the Prussians, whom he had defeated, though not destroyed, on 16 June at Ligny. Military strategists and historians agree that this decision was crucial but disagree about whether it was rational. Hypothesizing a zero-sum game between Napoléon and Blücher, and computing its solution, we show that dividing his army could have been a cautious strategy on Napoléon’s part, a conclusion which runs counter to the charges of misjudgment commonly heard since Clausewitz. On the other hand, the paper addresses some methodological issues relative to “analytic narratives”. Some political scientists and economists who are both formally and historically minded have proposed to explain historical events in terms of properly mathematical game-theoretic models. We liken the present study to this “analytic narrative” methodology, which we defend against some of objections that it has aroused. Generalizing beyond the Waterloo case, we argue that military campaigns provide an especially good opportunity for testing this new methodology.
2017
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/78029/1/MPRA_paper_78029.pdf
Mongin, Philippe (2017): A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Waterloo Campaign and Some Comments on the Analytic Narrative Project. Forthcoming in: Forthcoming in Cliometrica , Vol. 11, (2018)
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:83607
2019-10-03T07:50:31Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413139
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443033
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83607/
Non-economic approaches to competition: Lessons from psychoanalysis
Cocioc, Paul
A19 - Other
B49 - Other
D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
The paper suggests that several competitive behaviors are
well explained by psychological mechanism of human mind. And such explanations could be generalized to the behavior of all economic actors, to the firms’ strategies and actions on the market. Freud’s classical psychoanalysis is the framework to offer potential valid arguments for the role of competition in modern societies, for its significance and importance.
2016
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83607/3/MPRA_paper_83607.pdf
Cocioc, Paul (2016): Non-economic approaches to competition: Lessons from psychoanalysis. Published in: Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu , Vol. 9, No. 2 (2016): pp. 37-48.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:83650
2019-10-10T23:57:08Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D41:4131:413139
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443033
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83650/
Non-economic approaches to competition: Lessons from psychoanalysis
Cocioc, Paul
A19 - Other
B49 - Other
D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
The paper suggests that several competitive behaviors are
well explained by psychological mechanism of human mind. And such explanations could be generalized to the behavior of all economic actors, to the firms’ strategies and actions on the market. Freud’s classical psychoanalysis is the framework to offer potential valid arguments for the role of competition in modern societies, for its significance and importance.
2016
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83650/3/MPRA_paper_83607.pdf
Cocioc, Paul (2016): Non-economic approaches to competition: Lessons from psychoanalysis. Published in: Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu , Vol. 9, No. 2 (2016): pp. 37-48.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:89330
2019-09-28T03:26:23Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D43:4333:433332
7375626A656374733D46:4633:463331
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89330/
Exchange rate volatility: Trader's beliefs and the role of news
Roy Trivedi, Smita
B49 - Other
C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models
F31 - Foreign Exchange
The study of financial market volatility has focused on the unexpected and expected components of news (Vortelinos, 2015; Omrane and Hafner, 2015). We incorporate the role of biases arising from the 'availability' of recent outcomes to the traders, in influencing trading decisions. The theory of heuristics (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974) is used to build on the theory of trader's biases which helps to understand the reasons behind market volatility. Empirically the model is tested with five minute data on USD/INR and time stamped news from the US and Indian markets. We find that volatility is likely to be in higher ranges with increase in trader's biases, corresponding to unexpected news component. GARCH analysis of returns of average bid-ask rates shows that unexpected news, expected news and bias corresponding to expected news lead to increased volatility.
2018-09-30
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89330/2/MPRA_paper_89330.pdf
Roy Trivedi, Smita (2018): Exchange rate volatility: Trader's beliefs and the role of news.
en
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:98488
2020-03-25T21:55:02Z
7374617475733D707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423431
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D42:4235
7375626A656374733D45:4531:453131
7375626A656374733D45:4531:453132
7375626A656374733D45:4536:453630
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98488/
Postkeynesianismus Ein heterodoxer Ansatz auf der Suche nach einer Fundierung
Heise, Arne
B41 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches
E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian
E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian
E60 - General
This article takes an in-depth look at post-Keynesianism as a paradigmatic alternative to the dominant neoclassical mainstream. It quickly becomes clear that post-Keynesianism is not a unified school of thought, but rather an assortment of theoretical approaches that share certain methodological and epistemological similarities and characteristic postulates. The Article does not attempt to describe the full array of Kaleckian, Kaldorian and Sraffian variants of post-Keynesian theory but instead analysis the paradigmatic and formal structure of one particular form of post-Keynesianism, the monetary theory of production in order to reconstruct these characteristic postulates from the axiomatic core of post-Keynesianism. It then sets out the theory of market participation, an alternative theory of economic policy that builds on monetary production economics.
2019-04
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98488/8/MPRA_paper_98488.pdf
Heise, Arne (2019): Postkeynesianismus Ein heterodoxer Ansatz auf der Suche nach einer Fundierung. Published in: List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik , Vol. 44, No. 4 (April 2019): pp. 867-888.
de
oai:mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de:113677
2024-03-28T20:58:53Z
7374617475733D756E707562
7375626A656374733D42:4234
7375626A656374733D42:4234:423439
7375626A656374733D44:4430
7375626A656374733D44:4430:443031
7375626A656374733D44:4439
74797065733D7061706572
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/113677/
Kantian Epistemology in Examination of the Axiomatic Principles of Economics: the Synthetic a Priori in the Economic Structure of Society
Mughal, Adil Ahmad
B4 - Economic Methodology
B49 - Other
D0 - General
D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
D9 - Intertemporal Choice
Transcendental Analytic, in Critique of Pure Reason, combines the space and time as conditions of the possibility of phenomenon from Transcendental Aesthetic with the pure magnitude-intuition notion. The property of continuity as a qualitative result of the additive magnitude brings the possibility of connecting with experience, even though only as a
potential because of the a priori necessity from assumption, as syntheticity of the a priori task of a scientific method of philosophy given by Kant, which precludes the application of categories to something not empirically reducible to the content of such a category's corresponding and possible object. This continuity as the qualitative result of a priori constructed notion of magnitude lies as a fundamental assumption and property of, what in
Microeconomic theory is called as, 'choice rules' which combine the potentially-empirical and practical budget-price pairs with preference relations. This latter result is the purest qualitative side of the choice rules' otherwise autonomously quantitative nature. The theoretical, barring the empirical, nature of this qualitative result is a synthetic a priori truth, which, if at all, it should be, if the axiomatic structure of economic theory is held to be correct. It has a potentially verifiable content as its possible object in the form of quantitative price-budget pairs, yet, the object that serves the respective Kantian category is qualitative itself which is utility. This article explores the validity of Kantian qualifications for this application of 'categories' to the economic structure of society.
2022-06-15
MPRA Paper
NonPeerReviewed
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/113677/1/MPRA_paper_113546.pdf
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/113677/8/MPRA_paper_113672.pdf
application/pdf
en
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/113677/16/MPRA_paper_113677.pdf
Mughal, Adil Ahmad (2022): Kantian Epistemology in Examination of the Axiomatic Principles of Economics: the Synthetic a Priori in the Economic Structure of Society.
en