Malafry, Laurence and Soares Brinca, Pedro (2020): Climate Policy in an Unequal World: Assessing the Cost of Risk on Vulnerable Households.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100201.pdf Download (457kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Policy makers concerned with setting optimal values for carbon instruments to address climate change externalities often employ integrated assessment models (IAMs). While these models differ on their assumptions of climate damage impacts, discounting and technology, they conform on their assumption of complete markets and a representative household. In the face of global inequality and significant vulnerability of asset poor households, we relax the complete markets assumption and introduce a realistic degree of global household inequality. A simple experiment of introducing a range of global carbon taxes shows a household’s position on the global wealth distribution predicts the identity of their most-preferred carbon price. Specifically, poor agents prefer strong public action against climate change to mitigate the risk for which they are implicitly more vulnerable. This preference exists even without progressive redistribution of the revenue. We find that, parallel to the literature on macroeconomic policy and incomplete markets, the carbon tax can partially fill the role of insurance by reducing the volatility of future welfare. It is this role that drives the wedge between rich and poor households’ policy preferences, where rich households’ preferences closely mimic the representative agent. Estimates of the optimal carbon tax and the welfare gains of mitigation strategies may be underestimated if this channel is not taken into account.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Climate Policy in an Unequal World: Assessing the Cost of Risk on Vulnerable Households |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Climate change, Inequality, Risk, Optimal carbon policy |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H31 - Household Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 100201 |
Depositing User: | Pedro Brinca |
Date Deposited: | 10 May 2020 12:17 |
Last Modified: | 10 May 2020 12:17 |
References: | [1] Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C., and Tol, R. S. (2009a). Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecological Economics, 68(3):836–849. [2] Anthoff, D., Tol, R. S., and Yohe, G. (2009b). Discounting for climate change. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 3. [3] Arrhenius, S. (1896). Xxxi. on the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(251):237–276. [4] Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E., and Tavoni, M. (2006). Witch-a world induced technical change hybrid model. University Ca’Foscari of Venice Economic Research Paper, (46/06). [5] Bosetti, V. and Maffezzoli, M. (2013). Taxing carbon under market incompleteness. Davies, J. B., Sandstr¨om, S., Shorrocks, A., and Wolff, E. N. (2011). The level and distribution of global household wealth. The Economic Journal, 121(551):223–254. [6] Dell, M., Jones, B. F., and Olken, B. A. (2012). Temperature shocks and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, pages 66–95. [7] Dell, M., Jones, B. F., and Olken, B. A. (2013). What do we learn from the weather? the new climate-economy literature. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. [8] Dennig, F., Budolfson, M. B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A., and Socolow, R. H. (2015). Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52):15827–15832. [9] Floden, M. (2001). The effectiveness of government debt and transfers as insurance. Journal of Monetary Economics, 48(1):81–108. [10] Fremstad, A. and Paul, M. (2019). The impact of a carbon tax on inequality. Ecological Economics, 163:88–97. [11] Fried, S., Novan, K., and Peterman, W. B. (2018). The distributional effects of a carbon tax on current and future generations. Review of Economic Dynamics, 30:30–46. [12] Gerst, M. D., Howarth, R. B., and Borsuk, M. E. (2010). Accounting for the risk of extreme outcomes in an integrated assessment of climate change. Energy Policy, 8(8):4540–4548. [13] Golosov, M., Hassler, J., Krusell, P., and Tsyvinski, A. (2014). Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium. Econometrica, 82(1):41–88. [14] Hassler, J., Krusell, P., and Smith Jr, A. A. (2016). Environmental macroeconomics. In Handbook of macroeconomics, volume 2, pages 1893–2008. Elsevier. [15] Heathcote, J., Storesletten, K., and Violante, G. L. (2009). Quantitative macroeconomics with heterogeneous households. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. [16] Howarth, R. B., Gerst, M. D., and Borsuk, M. E. (2014). Risk mitigation and the social cost of carbon. Global environmental change, 24:123–131. [17] Krusell, P. and Smith, Jr, A. A. (1998). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy. Journal of political Economy, 106(5):867–896. [18] Krusell, P. and Smith Jr, A. A. (2015). Climate change around the world. In Work in progress, Walras-Bowley Lecture. Econometric Society 2015 World Congress, Montreal. 26 [19] Leimbach, M., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., and Edenhofer, O. (2010). Mitigation costs in a globalized world: climate policy analysis with remind-r. Environmental modeling & assessment, 15(3):155–173. [20] Mankiw, N. G. (1986). The equity premium and the concentration of aggregate shocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(1):211–219. [21] Nordhaus, W. and Sztorc, P. (2013). Dice 2013r: Introduction and user’s manual. retrieved November. Nordhaus, W. D. and Yang, Z. (1996). Rice: a regional dynamic general equilibrium model of optimal climate-change policy. American Economic Review, 86(4):741–765. [22] Olsson, L., Opondo, M., Tschakert, P., Agrawal, A., Eriksen, S. E., et al. (2014). Livelihoods and poverty. [23] Ortiz, I. and Cummins, M. (2011). Global inequality: Beyond the bottom billion–a rapid review of income distribution in 141 countries. Available at SSRN 1805046. [24] Saelen, H., Atkinson, G., Dietz, S., Helgeson, J., and Hepburn, C. J. (2008). Risk, inequality and time in the welfare economics of climate change: is the workhorse model underspecified. University of Oxford Department of Economics Working Paper, 400. [25] Skoufias, E. (2012). The poverty and welfare impacts of climate change: quantifying the effects, identifying the adaptation strategies. World Bank Publications. [26] Tol, R. S. (1997). On the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions: an application of fund. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2(3):151–163. [27] Tol, R. S. (2009). The economic effects of climate change. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(2):29–51. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100201 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Climate Policy in an Unequal World: Assessing the Cost of Risk on Vulnerable Households. (deposited 10 May 2020 12:17) [Currently Displayed]