de Soyres, Francois and Gaillard, Alexandre (2020): Global Trade and GDP Co-Movement.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100518.pdf Download (406kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We revisit the association between trade and GDP comovement for 135 countries from 1970 to 2009. Guided by a simple theory, we introduce two notions of trade linkages: (i) the usual direct bilateral trade index and (ii) new indexes of common exposure to third countries capturing the role of similarity in trade networks. Both measures are economically and statistically associated with GDP correlation, suggesting an additional channel through which GDP fluctuations propagate through trade linkages. Moreover, high income countries become more synchronized when the content of their trade is tilted toward inputs while trade in final goods is key for low income countries. Finally, we present evidence that the density of the international trade network is associated with an amplification of the association between global trade flows and bilateral GDP comovement, leading to a significant evolution of the trade comovement slope over the last two decades.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Global Trade and GDP Co-Movement |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | International Trade, International Business Cycle Comovement, Networks, Input-Output Linkages. |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F44 - International Business Cycles F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F62 - Macroeconomic Impacts |
Item ID: | 100518 |
Depositing User: | Francois de Soyres |
Date Deposited: | 26 May 2020 08:58 |
Last Modified: | 26 May 2020 08:58 |
References: | Barrot, J.-N. and Sauvagnat, J. (2016). Input Specificity and the Propagation of Idiosyncratic Shocks in Production Networks *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3):1543–1592. Basu, S. and Fernald, J. G. (2002). Aggregate productivity and aggregate technology. European Economic Review, 46(6):963–991. Baxter, M. and Kouparitsas, M. A. (2005). Determinants of business cycle comovement: a robust analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(1):113–157. Bems, R., Johnson, R. C., and Yi, K.-M. (2011). Vertical linkages and the collapse of global trade. American Economic Review, 101(3):308–12. Burstein, A., Kurz, C., and Tesar, L. (2008). Trade, production sharing, and the international transmission of business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(4):775–795. Calderon, C., Chong, A., and Stein, E. (2007). Trade intensity and business cycle synchronization: Are developing countries any different? Journal of international Economics, 71(1):2–21. Clark, T. and van Wincoop, E. (2001). Borders and business cycles. Journal of International Economics, 55(1):59–85. Comin, D. and Gertler, M. (2006). Medium-term business cycles. American Economic Review, 96(3):523–551. De Loecker, J. and Eeckhout, J. (2018). Global market power. Working Paper 24768, National Bureau of Economic Research. de Soyres, F. and Gaillard, A. (2019). Value added and productivity linkages across countries. FRB International Finance Discussion Paper No. 1266. Di Giovanni, J. and Levchenko, A. A. (2010). Putting the parts together: Trade, vertical linkages, and business cycle comovement. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2):95– 124. di Giovanni, J., Levchenko, A. A., and Mejean, I. (2016). The Micro Origins of International Business Cycle Comovement. NBER Working Papers 21885, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Diez, M. F., Leigh, M. D., and Tambunlertchai, S. (2018). Global market power and its macroeconomic implications. International Monetary Fund. Duval, R., Li, N., Saraf, R., and Seneviratne, D. (2015). Value-added trade and business cycle synchronization. Journal of International Economics, pages 251–262. Fontagné, L. (1999). Foreign Direct Investment and International Trade: Complements or Substitutes? OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1999/3, OECD Publishing. Frankel, J. A. and Rose, A. K. (1998). The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria. Economic Journal, 108(449):1009–25. Huo, Z., Levchenko, A. A., and Pandalai-Nayar, N. (2019). The Global Business Cycle: Measurement and Transmission. Working Papers 669, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan. Imbs, J. (2004). Trade, finance, specialization, and synchronization. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3):723–734. Inklaar, R., Jong-A-Pin, R., and De Haan, J. (2008). Trade and business cycle synchronization in oecd countries: A re-examination. European Economic Review, 52(4):646–666. Johnson, R. C. (2014). Trade in intermediate inputs and business cycle comovement. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(4):39–83. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Papaioannou, E., and Peydro, J.-L. (2013). Financial regulation, financial globalization, and the synchronization of economic activity. The Journal of Finance, 68(3):1179–1228. Kehoe, T. J. and Ruhl, K. J. (2008). Are shocks to the terms of trade shocks to productivity? Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4):804 – 819. Kose, M. A. and Yi, K.-M. (2006). Can the standard international business cycle model explain the relation between trade and comovement? Journal of International Economics, 68(2):267– 295. Liao, W. and Santacreu, A. M. (2015). The trade comovement puzzle and the margins of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 96(2):266 – 288. Ng, E. C. (2010). Production fragmentation and business-cycle comovement. Journal of International Economics, 82(1):1–14. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100518 |