Exposure to economic inequality at the age of 8 enhances prosocial behaviour in adult life

Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Caldentey, Pedro and Espín, Antonio M. and Garcia, Teresa and Hernández, Ana (2020): Exposure to economic inequality at the age of 8 enhances prosocial behaviour in adult life.

Abstract

Children as young as 3-4 years are already concerned about inequality and declare that equality is a norm that should be followed1. From 3 to 8 years they develop a strong preference for equality, which is typically reflected in both “envy” and “compassion”2,3, that is, aversion to disadvantageous and advantageous inequality, respectively4. Further studies suggest that inequality aversion does not continue increasing after that age, but rather exhibit an inverse-U shape relation with age in childhood and adolescence, with a peak at 8 years old3,5. Since children are particularly sensitive to inequality at the age of 8, it is an open question how exposure to real economic inequality at this age modulates prosocial behavior in adult life. Here we link generosity in dictator game experiments conducted among Spanish university students (n>400) with existing macro-level data on income inequality within their region when they were children. The data show that individuals who were exposed to higher levels of inequality at the age of 8 are more generous in adult life. Interestingly, exposure at older ages has no impact on generosity. Our results extend previous findings on the development of egalitarianism by showing long-lasting effects of childhood inequality experience into adult life. If prosocial behaviour is (partly) developed as a reaction to an unequal environment then, in the future, inequality might be counteracted.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Income inequality, prosocial behavior, dictator game experiments, early exposure.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

1. McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Steinbeis, N. & Warneken, F. The developmental foundations of human fairness. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 0042 (2017).

2. Fehr, E., Bernhard, H. & Rockenbach, B. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454, 1079–1083 (2008).

3. Fehr, E., Glätzle-Rützler, D. & Sutter, M. The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. European Economic Review 64, 369–383. (2013) 4. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M. A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 114(3), 817–868 (1999).

5. Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø. & Tungodden, B. Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science 328, 1176–1178 (2010).

6. Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R. & Harris, P. L. I should but I won’t: why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS ONE 8, e59510 (2013).

7. Geraci, A. & Surian, L. The developmental roots of fairness: infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Development Science 14, 1012–1020 (2011).

8. Schmidt, M. F. H. & Sommerville, J. A. Fairness expectations and altruistic sharing in 15-month-old human infants. PLoS ONE 6, 1–7 (2011).

9. Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R. & Premack, D. Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological Science 23, 196–204 (2012).

10. LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S. & Haidt, J. When getting something good is bad: even three-year-olds react to inequality. Social Development 20, 154–170 (2010).

11. Warneken, F. How children solve the two challenges of cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology 69, 205-229. (2018).

12. Blake, P. R. & McAuliffe, K. I had so much it didn’t seem fair: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition 120(2), 215-224 (2011).

13. House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., Hewlett, B. S., McElreath, R. & Laurence, S. Ontogeny of prosocial behaviour across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(36), 14586-14591 (2013).

14. Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., Corbit, J., Callaghan, T. C., Barry, O., Bowie, A., ... & Wrangham, R. The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies. Nature 528(7581), 258-261 (2015).

15. Martín, J., Branas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., Gamella, J. F. & Herrmann, B. The appropriate response of Spanish Gitanos: short-run orientation beyond current socio-economic status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 12-22 (2019).

16. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W. & Robertson, T. E. The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(6), 1015 (2011).

17. Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K. & Nettle, D. Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments. Current Opinion in Psychology 7, 76-80 (2016).

18. Van Lange, P. A. M., De Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W. & Joireman, J. A. Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(4), 733–746 (1999).

19. Pollak, S. D. Mechanisms linking early experience and the emergence of emotions: Illustrations from the study of maltreated children. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(6), 370-375 (2008)

20. McCullough, M. E., Pedersen, E. J., Schroder, J. M., Tabak, B. A. & Carver, C. S. Harsh childhood environmental characteristics predict exploitation and retaliation in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1750), 20122104 (2013).

21. Amir, D., Jordan, M. R. & Rand, D. G. An uncertainty management perspective on long-run impacts of adversity: The influence of childhood socioeconomic status on risk, time, and social preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79, 217-226 (2018).

22. Kajanus, A., McAuliffe, K., Warneken, F. & Blake, P. R. Children’s fairness in two Chinese schools: A combined ethnographic and experimental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 177, 282-296 (2019).

23. Hazelbaker, T., Griffin, K. M., Nenadal, L. & Mistry, R. S. Early elementary school children’s conceptions of neighborhood social stratification and fairness. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 4(2), 153–164 (2018).

24. Elenbaas, L. Perceptions of economic inequality are related to children’s judgments about access to opportunities. Developmental Psychology 55(3), 471–481 (2019).

25. Fiske, S. T. Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology 44(1), 155-194 (1993).

26. Glenn, A. L., Kurzban, R. & Raine, A. Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior 16(5): 371-380 (2011).

27. Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., McCullough, M. E., Forster, D. E. & Joormann, J. Adulthood personality correlates of childhood adversity. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1357 (2014).

28. Nettle, D., Colléony, A. & Cockerill, M. Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. PloS ONE 6 (10), (2011).

29. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. & Draper, P. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development 62(4), 647-670 (1991).

30. Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W. & Kaplan, H. S. Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (2nd edition), 88-114. New York, NY: Wiley. (2015).

31. Winterhalder, B. Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5(4), 369-392 (1986).

32. Harsanyi, J. C. Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. Journal of Political Economy 61(5), 434-435 (1953).

33. Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1971).

34. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E. & Sefton, M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6(3), 347-369 (1994).

35. Camerer, C. F. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Russell Sage Foundation (2003).

36. Engel, C. Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics 14(4), 583-610 (2011).

37. Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F. & Herrmann, B. Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game. Scientific Reports 4(1), 1-4 (2014).

38. Romano, J. P. & Wolf, M. Stepwise Multiple Testing as Formalized Data Snooping. Econometrica 73(4), 1237–1282 (2005).

39. Herrero Blanco, C., Soler Guillén, Á. & Villar Notario, A. Desarrollo y pobreza en España y sus comunidades autónomas: el impacto de la crisis, Papeles de Economía Española 138: 98-113. (2013).

40. Furnival, G. M. & Wilson, R.W. Regressions by leaps and bounds. Technometrics 16(4), 499-511 (1974).

41. Piketty, T. & Saez, E. Inequality in the long run. Science 344(6186), 838-843 (2014).

42. Milanovic, B. Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press (2016).